The W
June 7, 2009 - birthdaybritney.jpg
Views: 178991155
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.3.24 0550
The W - Pro Wrestling - Daniel Bryan Released?! (Page 5)
This thread has 34 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.33
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 5
(3820 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (97 total)
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 947 days
Last activity: 327 days
#81 Posted on | Instant Rating: 10.00
If it's a work, then the only people they've worked so far are the people on the internet who pay close attention to this (and probably would've been watching anyway for the follow up for the NXT angle.) They would have to get the firing angle over on TV for it to be worth the effort.



thecubsfan.com - luchablog
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 327 days
Last activity: 327 days
#82 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.57
I'm kind of wondering if he is going to get the Matt Hardy 'not with the company' jumping from the crowd gig? I'm not sure how that fits with the angle, but maybe the angle got a lot bigger than the WWE was thinking.

geemoney
Scrapple








Since: 26.1.03
From: Naples, FL

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 9 hours
#83 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.19
Whenever I think, "Oh, maybe it's a work," I keep going back to what John Orquiola said on page one of this thread, which is something I also thought of at the outset: In the storyline, Bryan isn't under WWE contract because he didn't win NXT. So what would they be firing him from?
DJ FrostyFreeze
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Hawthorne, CA

Since last post: 137 days
Last activity: 137 days
#84 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.42
Read it and weep, fella


    Originally posted by thecubsfan
    They would have to get the firing angle over on TV for it to be worth the effort.
This is what I'm talking about.

If he doesnt show up on TV and there is no mention of his absence, it's real.

If he doesnt show up on TV and they play up how fired he is, it's a work.

I'm leaning towards the first one. Like someone already pointed out, the only "evidence" we have that this is a work is (A) the curious timing of his firing, (B) Cena's worked/shoot Twitter, and (C) all of this business (2nd/3rd hand and unconfirmed, mind you) about the alleged post-Benoit anti-choke policy that may or may not even be a thing. All of this seems like pretty weak evidence if you ask me. You did ask me, right?



CLICK OR DIE
Nothing to see here, move along.
Super Shane Spear
Bierwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Sector 7 Slums

Since last post: 5035 days
Last activity: 5035 days
#85 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.63
So now we've been through nearly an entire business day at Wall Street. Shouldn't shareholders be privy to exactly what's going on with the main roster by now? I understand in the grand scheme of things, Danielson isn't going to cause a major change in their stock price but shouldn't his real-life status have been reported by now on the corporate site?



You should listen to what I listen to
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 22.4.02
From: New Hampshire

Since last post: 766 days
Last activity: 350 days
ICQ:  
#86 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.71
    Originally posted by Super Shane Spear
    So now we've been through nearly an entire business day at Wall Street. Shouldn't shareholders be privy to exactly what's going on with the main roster by now? I understand in the grand scheme of things, Danielson isn't going to cause a major change in their stock price but shouldn't his real-life status have been reported by now on the corporate site?


Not the first person to have that thought. Then again, the corporate site only mentions one release since December: Carlito. So, uh, who knows.





You wanted the best, you got... the Out of Context Quote of the Week.

"...you are not a Meat Loaf mark; you're a member of the Meat Loaf Universe. (CRZ)

2P4E
Boerewors








Since: 4.1.05
From: SE12, London, UK.

Since last post: 3020 days
Last activity: 652 days
#87 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.32
His twitter hasn't been removed from the official WWE Twitter list of NXT Season 1 rookies, but that probably means even less than all the other speculative evidence/blind hoping going on. In fact if it was removed i'd probably think they were trying too hard to make him look fired for real and think it was more likely a work. I apologise for the additional mooting of all points relating to this issue.
odessasteps
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: MD, USA

Since last post: 3571 days
Last activity: 3538 days
#88 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.23

The amusing thing to me is the vast majority of WWE fans probably have no idea any of this happened.



Mark Coale
Odessa Steps Magazine
ISSUE FOUR - OCTOBER 2009
Super Shane Spear
Bierwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Sector 7 Slums

Since last post: 5035 days
Last activity: 5035 days
#89 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.63
    Originally posted by odessasteps

    The amusing thing to me is the vast majority of WWE fans probably have no idea any of this happened.


I disagree. The minority has now shifted to those that don't know how to utilize Facebook or Twitter by now. Plus, if you just type in Bryan Danielson (or Daniel Bryan) into google, the news is the first thing in your face (along with, amusingly enough, a picture of Wade Barrett.)

What's not being discussed too much is that the original posting may have been a botch in the first place. Maybe it was intended to be a test for future viral marketing, or maybe it was an elaborate in-joke from go. Either way, perhaps they completely underestimated the reach that they had. This would explain away the Michael Bay size plotholes the announcing made in the first place.

(edited by Super Shane Spear on 14.6.10 1301)


You should listen to what I listen to
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 3 days
ICQ:  
#90 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.41
    Originally posted by Super Shane Spear
    What's not being discussed too much is that the original posting may have been a botch in the first place. Maybe it was intended to be a test for future viral marketing, or maybe it was an elaborate in-joke from go.
It's not being discussed because it's a giant leap and totally incredible.

Please, people...stop the madness. There's speculation and then there's speculation. (And I'm not even that big a fan of speculation in the first place, because people WAY too quickly leap from "educated" to "just makin' shit up.")

RAW's only a few hours away - let's try to hold on for another seven hours (give or take) and then we may be able to make some more educated guesses.



Spank E
Bockwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: Plymouth, UK

Since last post: 1803 days
Last activity: 32 days
#91 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.83
And the winner of the "Complete-madeup-bullshit-but-to-the-point-of-hilarity-with-gaps-in-their-logic-so-large-you-could-drive-a-Hummer-through-them" award goes to no name website WrestlingInsider.org with their "exclusive" scoop on HHH being the reason for Danielson's firing.

http://www.wrestlinginsider.org/?p=112

Enjoy.



Hokienautic
Lap cheong








Since: 2.1.02
From: Blacksburg VA

Since last post: 1467 days
Last activity: 1452 days
#92 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.74
    Originally posted by Spank E
    And the winner of the "Complete-madeup-bullshit-but-to-the-point-of-hilarity-with-gaps-in-their-logic-so-large-you-could-drive-a-Hummer-through-them" award goes to no name website WrestlingInsider.org with their "exclusive" scoop on HHH being the reason for Danielson's firing.

    http://www.wrestlinginsider.org/​?​p=112

    Enjoy.


And the biggest logic gap: "The next day, Triple H confronted Danielson during the Smackdown! tapings ..."

So he abandoned his fearful children to hop on a plane and confront Danielson in person? Riiiiight.
JimBob Skeeter
Bierwurst








Since: 2.1.02
From: MN

Since last post: 1678 days
Last activity: 1637 days
#93 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.62
    Originally posted by Super Shane Spear
    but shouldn't his real-life status have been reported by now on the corporate site?


The thing I got out of the vid on there is the main reason for all of the guest hosts was to have them videotape plugs for the corporate site.
;-)

Also, I find it funny that the second "WWE Superstar" you see on that vid is Jeff Hardy.
Tyler Durden
Landjager








Since: 22.2.04
From: Frankfurt, Germany

Since last post: 1281 days
Last activity: 1211 days
#94 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.13
    Originally posted by Spank E
    And the winner of the "Complete-madeup-bullshit-but-to-the-point-of-hilarity-with-gaps-in-their-logic-so-large-you-could-drive-a-Hummer-through-them" award goes to no name website WrestlingInsider.org with their "exclusive" scoop on HHH being the reason for Danielson's firing.

    http://www.wrestlinginsider.org/​?​p=112

    Enjoy.


Hahaha, that's exactly the joke I wanted to make earlier this day, but then forgot about.
Loosie
Boudin rouge








Since: 2.1.02
From: Kitchener, Ontario

Since last post: 4557 days
Last activity: 2141 days
#95 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.36
    Originally posted by Spank E
    And the winner of the "Complete-madeup-bullshit-but-to-the-point-of-hilarity-with-gaps-in-their-logic-so-large-you-could-drive-a-Hummer-through-them" award goes to no name website WrestlingInsider.org with their "exclusive" scoop on HHH being the reason for Danielson's firing.

    http://www.wrestlinginsider.org/​?​p=112

    Enjoy.


Umm...aren't his kids 4 and 2? (quickly checks Wikipedia)...yup one month away from being 4 and 2...would they really understand what they see on TV? And for that matter, would they really be up at that time watching WWE RAW! I mean my son (who is 16 months old) watches Baby Signing Time and can sign what he sees on TV, but really having that specific incident cause them to cry? That really is stretching the logic. And is totally laughable.

Oh that and we'd hear about his 'fit of rage spitting' on Eve Torres by now too.

Thanks for the laugh Spank E :)



Loosie.
Your friendly nieghbourhood Canadian.


---Under Construction---
This Is Not Spam
AWArulz
Scrapple








Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 99 days
Last activity: 99 days
#96 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.69
    Originally posted by drjayphd
      I understand in the grand scheme of things, Danielson isn't going to cause a major change in their stock price but shouldn't his real-life status have been reported by now on the corporate site?


    Not the first person to have that thought. Then again, the corporate site only mentions one release since December: Carlito. So, uh, who knows.


My company has hired and fired many employees since January and as far as I know, none of them have been reported on the company website. Including the release of a major exec and hiring from a competing company. Probably guys who move a lot more money than Brian Danielson.

(edited by AWArulz on 14.6.10 2103)


We'll be back right after order has been restored here in the Omni Center.

That the universe was formed by a fortuitous concourse of atoms, I will no more believe than that the accidental jumbling of the alphabet would fall into a most ingenious treatise of philosophy - Swift

AlbySure
Boerewors








Since: 10.12.01
From: LA

Since last post: 2506 days
Last activity: 2056 days
#97 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.02
    Originally posted by AWArulz
      Originally posted by drjayphd
        I understand in the grand scheme of things, Danielson isn't going to cause a major change in their stock price but shouldn't his real-life status have been reported by now on the corporate site?


      Not the first person to have that thought. Then again, the corporate site only mentions one release since December: Carlito. So, uh, who knows.


    My company has hired and fired many employees since January and as far as I know, none of them have been reported on the company website. Including the release of a major exec and hiring from a competing company. Probably guys who move a lot more money than Brian Danielson.

    (edited by AWArulz on 14.6.10 2103)


I believe only wellness-related releases are listed on the corporate website. And there wasn't even one listed in December, unless you count Umaga being released from life.
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 5
Thread rated: 5.33
Pages: Prev 1 2 3 4 5
Thread ahead: Aurelian "Grizzly" Smith
Next thread: Slammiversary 2010 results thread
Previous thread: TNAs "big surprise"
(3820 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Also, bck in 1999 the title changed hands twice (three times if you count the Rumble PPV too) between the Rumble and WM. And, as for the reason the title is untouchable, they want to give the champ some momentum heading into Wrestlemania.
- TheBucsFan, Who will win the Royal Rumble? (2002)
Related threads: Undertaker out for the summer; scratched from PPV - WWE 2011 HOF Class Speculation (WCW) - What a WWE tryout is like - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - Daniel Bryan Released?! (Page 5)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2024 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.334 seconds.