Martin's a compiler. He was never the best back in football. Heck, in 11 seasons, he was only one of the top 6 backs (pro bowler) 5 times. He's 4th in rushing yards, but that's because he's 3rd in rushes.
Of the 48 players who are both in the top 50 in rushes and rushing yardage, Martin's y/c is 41st. Jerome Bettis, who ranks 5th all time in yardage, is 45th in y/c.
If it were me, I wouldn't vote for them in the HoF at all. As the cliche goes (feel free to post this in the One Question thread), it's the "Hall of Fame", not the "Hall of Very Good".
Thread ahead: Thurman reinstatement denied; suspension extended through 2007 Next thread: Priest Holmes ready to return Previous thread: Dwight Freeney: 6 years, $72m, highest paid def. player in history
I have to agree with the 210 logic. I wouldn't have chosen either of them for MVP. Player of the Year maybe, but MVP is supposed to mean something different. Of course, I would have chosen URLACHER~! but that's just me. There, I feel better now.