Next time CRZ is really bored, there are a couple of little, obscure features that I'd been thinking about (but that I didn't get into the end-of-year thread (The W)).
1) Have we considered an expiration date on the [ spoiler ] tag? it's only a spoiler til SmackDown airs on Friday night -- no real need to continue to show it as a fully obscured spoiler after that point.
2. You also broke your post with your anchor, I think (maybe it needs an </a> immediately following it?) but if you REALLY know what you're doing, I think you could just insert your anchor - or some equivalent raw markup, even - using the CKEditor. And you could do that already.
Speaking of the CKEditor, ...actually, let me go find the CKEditor thread and tack a reply onto there.
Originally posted by CRZ2. You also broke your post with your anchor, I think (maybe it needs an < /a> immediately following it?)
Damn! Sorry if I broke that. (Looked/looks OK in my browser.) I thought I put the < /a > after the rest of the "spoilers" block -- sorry if you had to tidy up after me.
Originally posted by CRZ... but if you REALLY know what you're doing,
(... Well, maybe on a good day ... :-) )
Originally posted by CRZI think you could just insert your anchor - or some equivalent raw markup, even - using the CKEditor. And you could do that already.
I'm thinking that the first scenario that falls to the ground is if the anchor isn't in a post that happens to be on the first displayed page of the thread. If it's worthwhile, after I get home ("Live from Las Vegas!"), I'll play with it some.
Well, I'm not ready to apologise to his family just yet, but I stand by my seeming editorial inconsistency. So, for no reason, HERE! A picture of ME and Public Enemy (with all the background people overly quickly and poorly edited out! EXPLOITATION!