The W
Views: 100025246
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
25.10.14 0400
The W - Site Feedback - Column rejection?
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(1244 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (3 total)
Lap cheong

Since: 2.1.02
From: Ottawa, Ontario

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 4 hours
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.87
Someone posted this in an earlier thread:

you know, if I was an inspired genius like some of you, I'd probably just write a column or something. But I'm not, so CRZ will never have the joy of rejecting my trash

So I'll ask CRZ here. How much content do you get that you simply don't put up, and how bad does it have to be in order to be ignored?

Contact cfgb
Visit my homepage
Promote this thread!
As young as
he feels

Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 16 hours
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.21
I always thought he put everything up. Maybe he does screen some stuff out.

[red]He's Rolie Polie Olie - and in his world of curves and curls, he's the swellest kid around.[red]
Big Brother

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
#3 Posted on
I only reject about 3-5% of the stuff I get, I'd say, for reasons known to no one but myself. Of course, despite my pretty much open door policy I don't actually get a lot of submissions. I think it's probably that front I appear to put up. ;-)

Visit [slash] wrestling
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Rank stuff
Next thread: Slashwrestling where art thou?
Previous thread: Coming Soon: Heart
(1244 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
So close, but the megaclick was claimed by the Spinn3r robot. Closest on either side were thecubsfan (-1) and Spaceman Spiff (+5). Recent millions (and how long it took to get there) 77M 20 Feb 2012 22:44:20 (34:06:12:50) 76M 17 Jan 2012 16:31:30 (34:
The W - Site Feedback - Column rejection?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.13 seconds.