The W
Views: 95694393
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.4.14 1612
The W - the-w.com Site Feedback - Closed vs Banished Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 9.08
Pages: 1
(849 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
SomeRandomFag IV
Cotechino








Since: 12.8.03

Since last post: 3448 days
Last activity: 3448 days
#1 Posted on
What is the difference between a closed thread and a banished thread? Does it depend on a mod's mood? Does one have more honor/shame than another? Are banished threads extreme bad examples to all, like a head on a stake?
Promote this thread!
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 6 hours
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 10.00
I'm guessing:

Closed are threads that had some value at some point (if only to prevent that same thread from being repeated a day later) and Banished are those who never had any value to begin with.
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 9.41
Banished threads are the heads on poles outside of the city - they serve as a warning to all who enter that *this* was considered stupid, pointless, offensive, etc.

Only one example really needs to live. The rest can just be deleted.



Willful ignorance of science is not commendable. Refusing to learn the difference between a credible source and a shill is criminally stupid.
Thread rated: 9.08
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Where's the Ladies' Board?!
Next thread: Difference between General and Unrelated
Previous thread: Satire
(849 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
It seems that it wont accept anyone born before 1901. I never thought that slashwrestling would be biased against seniors.
- eviljonhunt81, How did my birthdate get changed? (2002)
The W - the-w.com Site Feedback - Closed vs BanishedRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.067 seconds.