The W
Views: 139243580
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
15.12.18 2004
The W - Pro Wrestling - Clash of Champions Results (Page 2)
This thread has 8 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.35
Pages: Prev 1 2
(478 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (21 total)
Torchslasher
Knackwurst








Since: 17.1.02
From: New F'n Jersey

Since last post: 83 days
Last activity: 24 days
#21 Posted on | Instant Rating: 5.29
    Originally posted by Tenken347
    I enjoyed Cesaro/Sheamus more than I thought would be possible, so of course it gets the shittiest finish possible. The crowd was screaming for Sheamus to throw off the refs and rush back to the ring to finish the match, but instead they just let the "final" match of seven - no, I'm sorry, of nine - between these guys peter out to a non-finish. I feel like they're going to wind up putting these guys into a Wacky Tag Team That Doesn't Get Along because they've knifed through every other possible contender for the New Day and now they don't know what else to do.


Stop booking Raw dude.



"Put on your helmets, we'll be reaching speeds of 3!"
"It was nice of you to give that dead woman another chance."
"All right, look alive everybody...oh sorry Susan."- MST3K: Space Mutiny

YOUR 2015 W NCAA March Madness tournament champion!
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 5.35
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: WWE RAW #1218 9/26/2016 (did anybody watch it?)
Next thread: SmackDown Live #893 9/27/2016
Previous thread: Clash of Champions Prediction Thread
(478 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Qubber, if you are willing to fork over alot of cash (and if they use it next time or for any other ppv..i know i got the offer for the Rumble) go for the deals wwf.com offers. I went for the golden package (hehe..hehe..)
Related threads: Clash of Champions Prediction Thread - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - Clash of Champions Results (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.14 seconds.