The W
Views: 133121701
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.5.18 0755
The W - Pro Wrestling - Can the gimmick be bigger than the man?
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(13781 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (4 total)

Since: 4.1.02

Since last post: 5690 days
Last activity: 5526 days
#1 Posted on
After reviewing and reviewing Lance Storm's new Team Canada/Hart Foundation gimmick, I've decided that I don't like it. I think this is the kind of gimmick that can bury a guy. Remember in WCW the last month when they tried to move Storm away from his whole Team Canada/hating American thing, and it was unsuccessful? The fans weren't buying it.

And, I like Storm, I really do, but it has become increasingly more noticable to me he's not a god on the mic like I initially thought he was. He's talented as hell in the ring, and he's just decent on the mic (at least his WWE work has been in my eyes), but is this gimmick digging him and Christian and Test a hole they won't be able to get out of? I mean this gimmick as it is right now obliterates any chance Storm has of being a face outside the northern borders (anyone else dreading the possible return of the "USA sucks" chant when we return to Canada?). I thin the possibility he's not good enough on the mic to get out of this hole is high.

Me, personally, I'm just glad they didn't have Storm or Benoit join the group, becasue I think this is the type of thing that can ruin a guy for a looong amount of time. Anyone else think of someone who was ruined by a gimmick or who overcame something like this?

I don't remember, did Bret ever overcome the Hart Foundation while in the WWE?

Anyone else agree, disagree?

Triumph: I kid, I kid. I think Triple H is a great Wrestler! For-Ah! (pause looks around for crowd reaction) Me-Ah! (pause looks around for crowd reaction) To-Ah! Poop-Ah! ON!
Promote this thread!
Jim LotFP

Since: 9.1.02
From: Atlanta

Since last post: 5052 days
Last activity: 5050 days
#2 Posted on
I strongly disagree this is a problem.

Storm has been consistently buried for a long time now.

He has a role, which he was very successful with in WCW until they killed it dead with stupid booking in Canada.

This role does not require him to be a clown.

He is lucky.

If he gets 'stuck' with it, who cares? One of the things I hate about wrestling is a lack of character consistency over the years. This makes Lance Storm consistent.

It's not like he's Doink or the Godfather, where it's all gimmick and no wrestler.

Good for Lance if he can get over strong... and better if he can headline as a face in Canada because of it.

Lamentations of the Flame Princess
Weekly Metal Newsletter

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 1378 days
Last activity: 1378 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.42

    Originally posted by WhoBettahThanDeion
    I don't remember, did Bret ever overcome the Hart Foundation while in the WWE?

He didn't have time. The end of the America vs Canada angle was also the end of Hart's WWF career.

Mean Gene: "You know, I don't think it's a question - Goldberg, I don't think it's a question of who's next, I think it's a question of who's left?"
Goldberg: "No, see, that's where you're wrong. It ain't who's left, it's - WHO'S NEXT?"

"Just how hardcore am I? Well this morning, I drank milk that was two days past the expiration!"
-Norman Smiley

"She is one of them! She's CANADIAN!"
-Stevie Ray

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 10 hours
Last activity: 10 hours
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.52

If the anti-American angle means Lance Storm gets more TV time, then I'm down with that.

The dude needs to be used more consistently anyway, and given longer matches than he's been getting. And those matches should be on the big shows, not just Velocity and such.

Besides, Lance Storm was one of the few bright spots in 2000 WCW, one of the few guys (besides Booker T, Scott Steiner and the cruiserweights of course) worth watching.

So I'm glad they've finally gone back to what worked for him during the most memorable part of his career. I can dig it.

“You want a war, you got one. Only... only, let's do it right. In the ring, where it matters. Not on no microphones. Not in no newspapers or dirt sheets. In the ring... where it matters.”

--Scott Hall

Randomly Selected Weiner of the Day, 5/27/02

Pages: 1Thread ahead: GTV was GDTV
Previous thread: Shades of Grey?
(13781 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
This is slightly off topic, but still relevent to Kane and Undertaker. Since Kane VS. 'Taker is now pretty much a deadlock for WMXX, is anyone else afraid that Kane might actually go over 'Taker, breaking his undefeated streak at WM?
- Nuclear Winter, Kane & the title..and Taker (2003)
The W - Pro Wrestling - Can the gimmick be bigger than the man?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2018 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.534 seconds.