The W
Views: 97830156
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
31.7.14 0029
The W - Football - Cam eligible
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.86
Pages: 1
(374 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
wmatistic
Andouille








Since: 2.2.04
From: Austin, TX

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.08
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5870788

According to the full report on ncaa.org, they NCAA concluded that his dad did in fact ask schools for money. But since they couldn't show that Cam knew about it or that money was actually paid, he's clear.

Doesn't this pretty much give a green light to parents of recruits to go ask for whatever they want?
Promote this thread!
JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 10 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.60
    Originally posted by wmatistic
    Doesn't this pretty much give a green light to parents of recruits to go ask for whatever they want?


I guess it does until the NCAA changes the rule to say the kid and the school will get nicked in the future whether they knew what the parents/relatives/street agents were doing or not.



Holy fuck shit motherfucker shit. Read comics. Fuck shit shit fuck shit I sold out when I did my job. Fuck fuck fuck shit fuck. Sorry had to do it....

*snip*

Revenge of the Sith = one thumb up from me. Fuck shit. I want to tittie fuck your ass.
-- The Guinness. to Cerebus
wmatistic
Andouille








Since: 2.2.04
From: Austin, TX

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.08
    Originally posted by JayJayDean
      Originally posted by wmatistic
      Doesn't this pretty much give a green light to parents of recruits to go ask for whatever they want?


    I guess it does until the NCAA changes the rule to say the kid and the school will get nicked in the future whether they knew what the parents/relatives/street agents were doing or not.


I'm pretty sure the rule already says a parent can't ask for money on behalf of a kid. Does Cam not knowing mean it wasn't really on his behalf?

Sportswriters are saying the investigation is not done so this isn't final at all, just that at this point they didn't have enough to rule him out now. But again, them stating his dad asked for money seems like it should be enough to me.
wmatistic
Andouille








Since: 2.2.04
From: Austin, TX

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.08
Oh and the other funny note to me about all this is how Vegas knows all. Monday night they took off the line for the SEC championship game. Not many noticed but us college football message board junkies, but we figured it had something to do with Cam. Now we find out he was ruled ineligible by Auburn that day and it makes sense.

(edited by wmatistic on 1.12.10 1106)
JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 10 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.60
    Originally posted by wmatistic
    I'm pretty sure the rule already says a parent can't ask for money on behalf of a kid. Does Cam not knowing mean it wasn't really on his behalf?


I guess my logic is they are saying "Cam didn't know equals he CAN play", but in the future they will amend the policy to say whether he knew or not he can't play. That actually might be an effective deterrent, because you would think most parents wouldn't want to be the reason why their kid gets suspended and has a black mark on them.



Holy fuck shit motherfucker shit. Read comics. Fuck shit shit fuck shit I sold out when I did my job. Fuck fuck fuck shit fuck. Sorry had to do it....

*snip*

Revenge of the Sith = one thumb up from me. Fuck shit. I want to tittie fuck your ass.
-- The Guinness. to Cerebus
ekedolphin
Scrapple








Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 42 days
Last activity: 6 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 3.10
    Originally posted by JayJayDean
      Originally posted by wmatistic
      I'm pretty sure the rule already says a parent can't ask for money on behalf of a kid. Does Cam not knowing mean it wasn't really on his behalf?


    I guess my logic is they are saying "Cam didn't know equals he CAN play", but in the future they will amend the policy to say whether he knew or not he can't play. That actually might be an effective deterrent, because you would think most parents wouldn't want to be the reason why their kid gets suspended and has a black mark on them.


Yeah, and in the meantime, Auburn goes to the national championship game to play Oregon, and as a side note, TCU (a non-BCS squad) doesn't get in. They'll really go to any lengths, it seems, to keep those pesky non-BCS-affiliated teams from possibly winning the national championship.



"Justice has a name. And the name it has, besides 'justice', is Captain Hammer."
--The Mayor, Dr. Horrible's Sing-a-Long Blog

Fan of the Indianapolis Colts (Super Bowl XLI Champions), Indiana Pacers and Washington Nationals

Certified RFMC Member-- Ask To See My Credentials!

Co-Winner of Time's Person of the Year Award, 2006

For the best in e-wrestling, visit the World Wrestling Alliance.  New and experienced players always welcome!

StingArmy
Andouille








Since: 3.5.03
From: Georgia bred, you can tell by my Hawk jersey

Since last post: 124 days
Last activity: 2 hours
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.43
    Originally posted by ekedolphin
      Originally posted by JayJayDean
        Originally posted by wmatistic
        I'm pretty sure the rule already says a parent can't ask for money on behalf of a kid. Does Cam not knowing mean it wasn't really on his behalf?


      I guess my logic is they are saying "Cam didn't know equals he CAN play", but in the future they will amend the policy to say whether he knew or not he can't play. That actually might be an effective deterrent, because you would think most parents wouldn't want to be the reason why their kid gets suspended and has a black mark on them.


    Yeah, and in the meantime, Auburn goes to the national championship game to play Oregon, and as a side note, TCU (a non-BCS squad) doesn't get in. They'll really go to any lengths, it seems, to keep those pesky non-BCS-affiliated teams from possibly winning the national championship.

This statement is idiotic. You really think it's "go[ing] to any length" to have Auburn playing for a national championship instead of TCU? As if it was a toss-up between which of the two teams deserved it more and somewhere out there a cabal of secret small school-hating ninjas jumped through some hoops to give the title shot to Auburn? Be reasonable.

I seriously doubt one single person in the entire country agrees with you, not even TCU fans.

- StingArmy
Thread rated: 4.86
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: RIP Don Meredith (April 10, 1938 - December 5, 2010)
Next thread: FINAL 2010 BCS standings - Week 8 of 8
Previous thread: NCAA Week 14: The End?
(374 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
45-17? What the hell is that? 6 interceptions? I'm not a Pack fan, but I'm not stupid enough to think Favre isn't great. How does he come one short of tying the NFL record for INTs in a game? What a terrible game.
Related threads: Report: TCU to join the Big East - College Football Week #13 - College Football Week 12 - More...
The W - Football - Cam eligibleRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.106 seconds.