User Post (22 total)
dMp Banger Since: 4.1.02 From: The Hague, Netherlands (Europe) Since last post: 9 days Last activity: 3 hours # 21 Posted on 5.8.05 0237.29 | Instant Rating: 5.58 I don't know what you are talking about. Brock's character was just fine and dandy. The fact that he was a bad-ass ass kicker yet outside of the ring he could seem rather laid back (after all he only cared about the ass kicking) made him a great character. In the end of his 2004 run, when he first went a bit nuts when dealing with Eddie and then Goldberg added a new dimension as well. So there was nothing wrong with Brock Lesnar, the character. I still hope we are being worked. *sigh* Why bother?
CHAPLOW Morcilla Since: 14.5.04 From: right behind you Since last post: 441 days Last activity: 441 days # 22 Posted on 5.8.05 1337.33 | Instant Rating: 1.85 Originally posted by Matt Tracker Originally posted by CRZ Or...MAYBE it means exactly what it says. Occam's razor and all that. This is a shocking lack of cynicism from The Chief. My perception of reality is all dizzied up. Hm... maybe he's in on the work! EDIT: Seriously though, Id take anything that would pump some life into Smackdown, I almost fell asleep watching the last half of it this week. (edited by WhoTookMyHonor? on 5.8.05 1143) Woot Toot Toot Woot Wooty Tooty Lemon Cookie Pages: Prev 1 2
Edge losing the hair couldn't hurt. It did wonders for Jarrett and revived Taker. It would also take away from the 'fun loving' surfer look that seems to get him into gimmick ruts...but the heel always loses these matches.
The W message board ZimBoard ©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.381 seconds.