|User||Post (22 total)|
From: The Hague, Netherlands (Europe)
Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 2 hours
|#21 Posted on 5.8.05 0237.29 | Instant Rating: 5.58|
|I don't know what you are talking about.|
Brock's character was just fine and dandy.
The fact that he was a bad-ass ass kicker yet outside of the ring he could seem rather laid back (after all he only cared about the ass kicking) made him a great character.
In the end of his 2004 run, when he first went a bit nuts when dealing with Eddie and then Goldberg added a new dimension as well.
So there was nothing wrong with Brock Lesnar, the character.
I still hope we are being worked.
*sigh* Why bother?
From: right behind you
Since last post: 259 days
Last activity: 40 days
|#22 Posted on 5.8.05 1337.33 | Instant Rating: 1.85|
Originally posted by Matt Tracker
Originally posted by CRZ
Or...MAYBE it means exactly what it says. Occam's razor and all that.
This is a shocking lack of cynicism from The Chief. My perception of reality is all dizzied up.
Hm... maybe he's in on the work!
EDIT: Seriously though, Id take anything that would pump some life into Smackdown, I almost fell asleep watching the last half of it this week.
(edited by WhoTookMyHonor? on 5.8.05 1143)
Woot Toot Toot Woot Wooty Tooty Lemon Cookie
|Pages: Prev 1 2
Unfortunately, I really TRIED to be a supporter of TNA, but things have just gotten so nonsensical in terms of storylines that it's hard to keep supporting them.
The W message board
©2001-2013 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.627 seconds.