The W
Views: 97870152
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
1.8.14 0512
The W - Pro Wrestling - Brock Lesnar Becoming Hardheaded Backstage
This thread has 18 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(9393 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (13 total)
skorpio17
Morcilla








Since: 11.7.02
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 2326 days
Last activity: 2326 days
#1 Posted on
Here I was thinking from the headline they’d give us an update on Brock’s condition and we get an ego update instead. (From 411, taken from 1popup)

I already know he has an ego. Except for the Rock every single major wrestling star has a major ego. (Goldberg and Triple H aren’t the only guys who ever refused to job.)

What I was looking for is confirmation that Brock isn’t seriously injured. I’d settle for baseless speculation as to what his injury is. (broken nose, concussion, sprained neck, broken neck, swelled head, etc.) Where are the sources from the hospital to name the injury?


“Could Lesnar be the latest talent to form an ego?

Recent reports indicate that Brock Lesnar could be getting somewhat of a big head backstage. Lesnar apparently did not want to listen to Kurt Angle's ideas for their WrestleMania match, and instead wanted to work the match his way. Angle was apparently very frustrated by Lesnar's unwillingness to work with him.

Brock also apparently made a fuss about having to job to the Rock at the 3/15 WWE house show in Miami, FL. Brock refused to do the job and WWE officials had to get Vince McMahon himself to speak with Brock and get him to do the job.”

Promote this thread!
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 396 days
Last activity: 396 days
#2 Posted on
How quickly they forget. Kurt Angle isn't even out for 2 days and he's left off the list of stars without egos.



Translated from Australian, Nathan Jones means El Gigante's less talented smaller brother.
Galidor
Boerewors








Since: 15.7.02

Since last post: 114 days
Last activity: 114 days
#3 Posted on
DOH

(edited by Galidor on 1.4.03 1134)
kazhayashi81
Potato korv








Since: 17.6.02
From: Buenos Aires, Argentina

Since last post: 2618 days
Last activity: 2569 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on
UNITED WE STAND

Galidor, re-read the post. He said Angle is one of the few WITHOUT one. And chill out, dude :)





"The time for debate is really beforehand. Obviously history will speak on whether this was the right thing or the wrong thing, but right now (the soldiers) are out there. Support 'em. There's plenty of time for commentary later."
-David Robinson
Galidor
Boerewors








Since: 15.7.02

Since last post: 114 days
Last activity: 114 days
#5 Posted on
BAH

Im used to negative posts from Redsox, so i guess i misread it out of expectations

My Apologies.
redsoxnation
Scrapple








Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 396 days
Last activity: 396 days
#6 Posted on

    Originally posted by Galidor
    BAH

    Im used to negative posts from Redsox, so i guess i misread it out of expectations

    My Apologies.







If I was in my usual negative mood, I would have mentioned that the person originally stated to having no ego and putting people over never put over Booker. Or Eddie Guerrero in a non-title match.



Translated from Australian, Nathan Jones means El Gigante's less talented smaller brother.
asteroidboy
Andouille








Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 1346 days
Last activity: 254 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.95

    Originally posted by redsoxnation

      Originally posted by Galidor
      BAH

      Im used to negative posts from Redsox, so i guess i misread it out of expectations

      My Apologies.







    If I was in my usual negative mood, I would have mentioned that the person originally stated to having no ego and putting people over never put over Booker. Or Eddie Guerrero in a non-title match.



Dude, he jobbed to the Hurricane. I know you don't like Rock, but he's the last person you can accuse of not putting people over.



-- Asteroid Boy


Wiener of the day: 23.7.02

"My brother saw the Undertaker walking through an airport."
"Was he no-selling?"
skorpio17
Morcilla








Since: 11.7.02
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 2326 days
Last activity: 2326 days
#8 Posted on
I must be a bad writer because you guys are missing my damn point.

I’m saying that since Brock damn near broke his neck at Mania, these newz sites should be trying to find out if he is ok.

Instead they run some negative article to make him look bad. So what if he has an ego? How is that different from everyone else? Just because he wouldn’t go along with Kurt’s ideas for the match doesn’t put him in the wrong.

They are trying to get the IWC smarks to turn against Brock just like they turned against Goldberg, Hogan, HBK, and everyone else judged to have an ego problem.

Chico Santana
Boudin rouge








Since: 2.7.02
From: Jaaaaamacia Mon, No Problem.

Since last post: 3971 days
Last activity: 3969 days
#9 Posted on
Skorpio17, It only makes him look bad if we choose to believe unnamed sources.



"SAL BANDINI, WANNA WRESTLE?"
CruelAngel777
Frankfurter








Since: 7.4.02

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 day
#10 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.70
How is it ok for this rookie trying to run the match? If this was your first day at a big meeting wouldn't you try to listen to someone who's been in a few first? That's why his neck is fucked up cause he wanted to try things his way.

commie_050
Cotechino








Since: 8.8.02
From: San Antonio, TX

Since last post: 3663 days
Last activity: 3662 days
#11 Posted on
I'll believe it when Brock petitions the writers to give him the World Title without a match for it.



If you don't mark for Sid, something is wrong with you.




What
lesser-known Simpsons character are you?


Brought to you by the good folks at sacwriters.com.
Davros
Blutwurst








Since: 22.8.02
From: Between thought and Reality, TZ

Since last post: 2575 days
Last activity: 2570 days
#12 Posted on
"Dear Idiot,

....nah, never mind.

Love,
CRZ"

>thinks to self< "Just like I thought, no balls, no brains, all talk."

Dear PATHETIC Idiot,

.......not gonna waste my time anymore.

Love,
Davros

P.S.-Ban me you conservative twit. And fuck all your ass kissers. You'll make a smart comment, but I win, because I won't read your reply-- BIATCH!!!

Word Lif3.

P.P.S.-Grut, you're absolutely right.

P.P.P.S.-CRZ, don't be mad, just continue being the king of your worl...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!




"Don't hate the Playa, hate the Game!"
A Fan
Liverwurst








Since: 3.1.02

Since last post: 3474 days
Last activity: 3474 days
#13 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.59
Ok, minus the weird Devors' post, I'd like to chim in with a wait in see approach. Graned, it maybe hypocritical to bash HHH for this stuff while I let Brock slide, but I give him the benefit of the doubt. He is young, pushed to the moon and now the future of this company of course he is probably going to have an ego.

However, he is a rookie and he was a rookie working in a match with a guy who had a fucked up back. I would hope that someone would slap him on the head eventually and say "Snap out of it". Of course, Angle walked out alive and thats all I really care about.

If it is true, then I am pissed that he fought against letting Rock get his job back at a house show in Rock's hometown. I do remember reading stuff where Rock praised Brock afterwards and embraced him, so I don't know if that is evidence or not.

It doesn't shock me too much since almost everything has revolved around him after Wrestlemania of last year, King of the Ring, beating the legends, his title win, Royal Rumble and even headlining Wrestlemania. If anything I wish the WWE would stop pushing rookies to the moon, they did with Angle and no one really take him seriously until Invasion and that was almost six months after his six month title run. Did that sentence make sense? Anyway, they should really try to find a way to reach a middle ground with the young guys. If they are speical then they should wait a year, get into the groove of things and then carry the ball. That way you can see if they have develop an ego or if the crowd really responses to them. I think a good year on the road with the WWE is a good indicatator if you can pull it off. Lesnar has pulled off really well, but that maybe due to the WWE just using the marketing machine in high gear and having Flair, Hogan, Rock, Angle and taker jobb to him.

A Fan- I don't know if I believe or not, but I'll wait and see if he starts doing anything really stupid.
Pages: 1Thread ahead: Smackdown Spoiler (maybe)
Next thread: Well, I certainly like Edge's new column so far.
Previous thread: HEAT Spoilers 6-Apr-2003
(9393 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Those are directly lifted from the XPW website. If anyone wants to put in the time to make an impartial review of the show, they are usually available for download starting around 11PM Eastern time at XPWTV.com.
- SmooveK, Shane Douglas (2002)
The W - Pro Wrestling - Brock Lesnar Becoming Hardheaded Backstage Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.404 seconds.