CRZ
Big Brother Administrator
   
   


          
         
      
Since: 9.12.01 From: ミネアポリス
Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 39 min.
| #1 Posted on 3.4.05 2324.34 | Instant Rating: 8.44 | http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA514334.html?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP
I guess nobody told them WrestleMania was tonight. 
Anyway...
USA Ponders Tag-Teaming With WWE
By Staff -- Broadcasting & Cable, 4/3/2005 9:25:00 PM
Will the possibility of "Vince McMahon: The Ride" help USA Network land a TV deal with World Wrestling Entertainment? The network is laying out plenty of inducements -- including an affiliation with parent company NBC Universal's theme parks -- in its negotiations.
Unfortunately, the network is not laying out a lot of money.
USA Network lost WWE's main attraction, Monday night prime time matches, to Spike TV in 2000. But with WWE's ratings fading on Spike, which has found the off-network rights to CBS hit CSI a more reliable investment, new Spike President Doug Herzog is not pursuing a new deal with WWE Chairman McMahon, though he does have the right to match any USA offer. (USA Network would not comment on the negotiations, and a WWE spokesman could not be reached.)
SEC filings show that WWE was collecting $31 million annually from Spike TV, but WWE sold the ad time itself. Industry executives say that USA isn't offering any big hike in the fee, instead relying on deal sweeteners, such as matches carried on NBC U's Telemundo Spanish-language network; wrestling specials on NBC; and wrestling-based attractions and promotions at Universals theme parks.
When USA Network lost the rights five years ago, Spike offered its own enticements, including a plan to publish wrestling books and schedule a wrestling-based reality show on Viacom sibling MTV. But Spike also tripled WWE's license fee.
WWE isn't quite the treasure it was back then, when USA Network rushed to court to try to stop Spike (then called TNN). Ratings are down by almost half, from a peak Nielsen household rating of 6.0 to 3.4 today.
However, the Monday matches remain one of the biggest draws on cable and are a magnet for young male viewers, so rasslin's hardly on the ropes.
When it seems like the whole world is full of idiots, maybe your standards are a bit high. - Guru Zim |
| Promote this thread! | | The Thrill
Banger
   
   


         
       
     
Since: 16.4.02 From: Green Bay, WI
Since last post: 8 days Last activity: 2 days
| #2 Posted on 4.4.05 0538.28 | Instant Rating: 4.25 | Thanks for a great season, Pick of the Week fans...see you this fall at Planet Magic in Denmark, WI!

Originally posted by Broadcasting & Cable >Will the possibility of "Vince McMahon: The Ride" help USA Network land a TV deal with World Wrestling Entertainment?
Wasn't that the roller coaster they used to call "The Genetic Jackhammer?"
Originally posted by Broadcasting & Cable ...deal sweeteners, such as matches carried on NBC U's Telemundo Spanish-language network; wrestling specials on NBC...
Dare we hope for the return of Saturday Night's Main Event or CRZ's beloved Los Super Astros?
Star wipe, and...we're out. Thrillin' ain't easy.
 THE THRILL ACW-NWA Wisconsin Home Video Technical Director...& A2NWO 4 Life! (Click the big G to hear the Packers Fight Song in RealAudio...or try .MP3, .AU, or .WAV!)
| TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan
   
   


         
        
      
Since: 2.1.02
Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 18 hours
| #3 Posted on 4.4.05 1007.30 | Instant Rating: 4.42 | Why won't they refer to RAW by name, instead calling it "Monday night prime time matches" throughout the story? Is there some kind of legal reason or what?
Become Republican! | Evil Buddha
Pickled pork
   
   

        
      
    
Since: 10.1.02 From: Somerville, MA
Since last post: 2330 days Last activity: 1728 days
| #4 Posted on 4.4.05 1138.28 | Instant Rating: 2.89 | The thing that gets me is that nowhere in this article is Smackdown mentioned... would the greater Viacom group still keep that show on UPN (which I believe I read they weren't interested in)?
"Naughty by Nature, Evil by Choice!" Evil Buddha... Wrestling Fan, Bud Man | CRZ
Big Brother Administrator
   
   


          
         
      
Since: 9.12.01 From: ミネアポリス
Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 39 min.
| #5 Posted on 4.4.05 1156.49 | Instant Rating: 8.44 | Originally posted by Evil Buddha The thing that gets me is that nowhere in this article is Smackdown mentioned... would the greater Viacom group still keep that show on UPN (which I believe I read they weren't interested in)?
The Smackdown contract is still far from over...we won't get any stories on this front until 2006.
When it seems like the whole world is full of idiots, maybe your standards are a bit high. - Guru Zim |
| BigSteve
Pepperoni
   
   

         
       
     
Since: 23.7.04 From: Baltimore, MD
Since last post: 2350 days Last activity: 2079 days
| #6 Posted on 4.4.05 1518.27 | Instant Rating: 2.38 | Correct me if I'm wrong, but USA was not under the NBC umbrella in 2000, right? I gotta think that this package, though maybe not for $40 million, is much more enticing than whatever Viacom will/has/would have offered.
History of the WWE (angelfire.com) | PeterStork
Sujuk
   
   


         
       
     
Since: 25.1.02 From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"
Since last post: 212 days Last activity: 32 days
| #7 Posted on 4.4.05 1910.50 | Instant Rating: 7.37 | Originally posted by BigSteve Correct me if I'm wrong, but USA was not under the NBC umbrella in 2000, right? I gotta think that this package, though maybe not for $40 million, is much more enticing than whatever Viacom will/has/would have offered.
NBC took control of USA on Thursday, May 13, 2004. (Thursday before the upfront.)
NBC Uni doesn't bring as much potential to the table as Viacom did (radio, billboards, multiple cable outlets like MTV) but CBS never explored most of those opportunities (and the Fed's brief affair with CBS Radio/WW1 actually happened several years before the Viacom deal when they did a couple pre-PPV specials on Saturday nights.) The difference is that CBS just saw WWE as a hot property to try to exploit, while NBC has a deeper relationship: SNME, Warren Littlefield's 1998 obsession with Raw (while his counterparts were drooling over Felicity, he told Variety that wrestling was what he wanted to get his hands on before anything else.)
exit 670 dot comHierarchy of Deities: Bryan Fuller > Sarah Vowell > Roger Ebert > Albert Pujols > Dee Brown This week on 24: The Return of...MR. RAINES! oxygen tank optional | Dahak
Frankfurter
   
   

        
       
     
Since: 12.5.02 From: Junction City OR.
Since last post: 1535 days Last activity: 1188 days
| #8 Posted on 5.4.05 1845.53 | Instant Rating: 1.20 | The WWE should take this deal if for no other reason than to get away from Viacom. NBC has shown that it is willing to work to promote their show even between different cable channels. Viacom only seems to want to push CBS shows. Plus any group that came up with the brillaint plan the Spike TV had at roll out is someone you don't want to partner with.
Marge I am just trying to get into heaven not run for Jesus. |
| | | | | | | | |