The W
February 23, 2017 - mayflower.jpg
Views: 178584124
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.3.24 0024
The W - Movies & TV - Broadcasting & Cable: USA Ponders Tag-Teaming with WWE
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 5.09
Pages: 1
(5254 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 17 days
Last activity: 8 days
ICQ:  
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.44
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA514334.html?display=Breaking+News&referral=SUPP

I guess nobody told them WrestleMania was tonight.

Anyway...


    USA Ponders Tag-Teaming With WWE

    By Staff -- Broadcasting & Cable, 4/3/2005 9:25:00 PM

    Will the possibility of "Vince McMahon: The Ride" help USA Network land a TV deal with World Wrestling Entertainment? The network is laying out plenty of inducements -- including an affiliation with parent company NBC Universal's theme parks -- in its negotiations.

    Unfortunately, the network is not laying out a lot of money.

    USA Network lost WWE's main attraction, Monday night prime time matches, to Spike TV in 2000. But with WWE's ratings fading on Spike, which has found the off-network rights to CBS hit CSI a more reliable investment, new Spike President Doug Herzog is not pursuing a new deal with WWE Chairman McMahon, though he does have the right to match any USA offer. (USA Network would not comment on the negotiations, and a WWE spokesman could not be reached.)

    SEC filings show that WWE was collecting $31 million annually from Spike TV, but WWE sold the ad time itself. Industry executives say that USA isn't offering any big hike in the fee, instead relying on deal sweeteners, such as matches carried on NBC U's Telemundo Spanish-language network; wrestling specials on NBC; and wrestling-based attractions and promotions at Universals theme parks.

    When USA Network lost the rights five years ago, Spike offered its own enticements, including a plan to publish wrestling books and schedule a wrestling-based reality show on Viacom sibling MTV. But Spike also tripled WWE's license fee.

    WWE isn't quite the treasure it was back then, when USA Network rushed to court to try to stop Spike (then called TNN). Ratings are down by almost half, from a peak Nielsen household rating of 6.0 to 3.4 today.

    However, the Monday matches remain one of the biggest draws on cable and are a magnet for young male viewers, so rasslin's hardly on the ropes.




When it seems like the whole world is full of idiots,
maybe your standards are a bit high.
- Guru Zim
CRZ
Promote this thread!
The Thrill
Banger








Since: 16.4.02
From: Green Bay, WI

Since last post: 3624 days
Last activity: 223 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.25
Thanks for a great season, Pick of the Week fans...see you this fall at Planet Magic in Denmark, WI!

    Originally posted by Broadcasting & Cable
    >Will the possibility of "Vince McMahon: The Ride" help USA Network land a TV deal with World Wrestling Entertainment?


Wasn't that the roller coaster they used to call "The Genetic Jackhammer?"


    Originally posted by Broadcasting & Cable
    ...deal sweeteners, such as matches carried on NBC U's Telemundo Spanish-language network; wrestling specials on NBC...


Dare we hope for the return of Saturday Night's Main Event or CRZ's beloved Los Super Astros?





Star wipe, and...we're out.
Thrillin' ain't easy.



THE THRILL
ACW-NWA Wisconsin
Home Video Technical Director...&
A2NWO 4 Life!
(Click the big G to hear the Packers Fight Song in RealAudio...or try .MP3, .AU, or .WAV!)
TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan








Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 3507 days
Last activity: 3507 days
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 4.42
Why won't they refer to RAW by name, instead calling it "Monday night prime time matches" throughout the story? Is there some kind of legal reason or what?





Become Republican!
Evil Buddha
Pickled pork








Since: 10.1.02
From: Somerville, MA

Since last post: 6255 days
Last activity: 5653 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.89
The thing that gets me is that nowhere in this article is Smackdown mentioned... would the greater Viacom group still keep that show on UPN (which I believe I read they weren't interested in)?



"Naughty by Nature, Evil by Choice!"
Evil Buddha... Wrestling Fan, Bud Man
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 17 days
Last activity: 8 days
ICQ:  
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.44
    Originally posted by Evil Buddha
    The thing that gets me is that nowhere in this article is Smackdown mentioned... would the greater Viacom group still keep that show on UPN (which I believe I read they weren't interested in)?
The Smackdown contract is still far from over...we won't get any stories on this front until 2006.



When it seems like the whole world is full of idiots,
maybe your standards are a bit high.
- Guru Zim
CRZ
BigSteve
Pepperoni








Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 6276 days
Last activity: 6004 days
#6 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.38
Correct me if I'm wrong, but USA was not under the NBC umbrella in 2000, right? I gotta think that this package, though maybe not for $40 million, is much more enticing than whatever Viacom will/has/would have offered.






History of the WWE (angelfire.com)
PeterStork
Sujuk








Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 3281 days
Last activity: 3044 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.37
    Originally posted by BigSteve
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but USA was not under the NBC umbrella in 2000, right? I gotta think that this package, though maybe not for $40 million, is much more enticing than whatever Viacom will/has/would have offered.





NBC took control of USA on Thursday, May 13, 2004. (Thursday before the upfront.)

NBC Uni doesn't bring as much potential to the table as Viacom did (radio, billboards, multiple cable outlets like MTV) but CBS never explored most of those opportunities (and the Fed's brief affair with CBS Radio/WW1 actually happened several years before the Viacom deal when they did a couple pre-PPV specials on Saturday nights.) The difference is that CBS just saw WWE as a hot property to try to exploit, while NBC has a deeper relationship: SNME, Warren Littlefield's 1998 obsession with Raw (while his counterparts were drooling over Felicity, he told Variety that wrestling was what he wanted to get his hands on before anything else.)





exit 670 dot com

Hierarchy of Deities: Bryan Fuller > Sarah Vowell > Roger Ebert > Albert Pujols > Dee Brown

This week on 24: The Return of...MR. RAINES!
oxygen tank optional

Dahak
Frankfurter








Since: 12.5.02
From: Junction City OR.

Since last post: 5461 days
Last activity: 5113 days
#8 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.20
The WWE should take this deal if for no other reason than to get away from Viacom.
NBC has shown that it is willing to work to promote their show even between different cable channels. Viacom only seems to want to push CBS shows.
Plus any group that came up with the brillaint plan the Spike TV had at roll out is someone you don't want to partner with.



Marge I am just trying to get into heaven not run for Jesus.
Thread rated: 5.09
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: Nashville Star-halfway through
Next thread: A little quick - "Doctor Who" role will be recast next season
Previous thread: 24 - 10pm to 11pm
(5254 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Hilarious. I and everyone else I know who saw Les Mis share this viewpoint.
- John Orquiola, Les Misérables (2013)
The W - Movies & TV - Broadcasting & Cable: USA Ponders Tag-Teaming with WWERegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2024 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.21 seconds.