The W
Views: 100261705
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
31.10.14 0306
The W - Pro Wrestling - Briscoes Re-sign with ROH
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 3.52
Pages: 1
(2185 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (3 total)
Scottyflamingo
Bratwurst








Since: 23.6.10
From: Auburn, AL

Since last post: 469 days
Last activity: 198 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.77
Good or bad?

I don't see anything left for them to do there, but whatever.
Promote this thread!
Galidor
Boerewors








Since: 15.7.02

Since last post: 205 days
Last activity: 204 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.14
Indifferent.

From past experience, we know a contract with ROH means next to nothing when WWE and TNA come calling.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator








Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.23
Well, it *does* make all the authors of "sure thing/done deal" stories after their WWE/FCW tryout(s) look like idiots, so there's that.

I like the Briscoes but really can't see them in the WWE - or I guess I should say I CAN see them, but only if they're saddled with a completely dumbass gimmick, and I don't want to see that.

That they've gone back to ROH (along with the Young Bucks ending up in TNA) is probably yet another indicator of WWE's interest in decent tag teams AND how seriously they take their tag team division at the moment. But this is kinda obvious.



Thread rated: 3.52
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: RAW #900 8/23/10
Next thread: documentarian Werner Herzog on Wrestlemania
Previous thread: RAW #899 8/16/10
(2185 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I had closed captions on and there they edited it to WWE.
Related threads: Adam Pearce out, Delirious in as ROH booker - ROH PPV - WGTT to reunite in ROH - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - Briscoes Re-sign with ROHRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.34 seconds.