My aunt ran the marathon and all of my cousins where at the finish waiting for her. Fortunately she finished about a half hour before the bombs. Unfortunately I didn't know this until about an hour after the attack. An absolutely harrowing feeling thinking and knowing that your family might be in the middle of something like this. As upset and unsettled that I am at what happened I am incredibly grateful that my family came home today.
So I have read in multiple places that police are treating this "as a terrorist investigation" (or some variation on that phrase). Does this actually mean anything practical is different about the investigation, or is it just a ridiculous phrase the media has latched onto for whatever reason?
Legally it just means they believe this is politically motivated one way or another.
"Tattoos are the mullets of the aughts." - Mike Naimark
"Don't stop after beating the swords into ploughshares, don't stop! Go on beating and make musical instruments out of them. Whoever wants to make war again will have to turn them into ploughshares first" - Yehuda Amichai
Originally posted by TheBucsFanSo I have read in multiple places that police are treating this "as a terrorist investigation" (or some variation on that phrase). Does this actually mean anything practical is different about the investigation, or is it just a ridiculous phrase the media has latched onto for whatever reason?
Along those lines, what would this have been called before 9/11? Somebody was trying to instill fear, or cause death/destruction/injury. This isn't "new", it's just semantics, isn't it?
I mean, I get that they will call this a terrorist act, whether international or domestic. But drawing a comparison to the bombing of the Chemistry Building in Madison during the Vietnam war, THAT wasn't called terrorism (maybe there's my answer).
I wouldn't be surprised to learn that something in the PATRIOT Act or other post-2001 legislation meant that if an investigation is called a "terrorist investigation" it allows for some sort of behavior on the part of the FBI and/or local police that normally wouldn't fly, which is why I asked the question. And if that were the case, that would raise all kinds of questions. But the fact that I haven't read anything specific to that effect so far leads me to believe that it's just the media getting excited about a particular phrase it can adopt as a buzzword to [insert criticism or conspiracy here].
I live in Cambridge right near MIT and the 7-11 where this all started. Apparently only a few blocks away from where these guys lived. Whole area is on lockdown now, and we've had cops come by asking us to stay inside all day until further notice.
Only because I am so comfortable with all the conservatives on this board am I giving them this fodder for further derision of the New York Times. If you've commited conservative hari-kiri and registered, here's the link.