mountinman44
Sujuk
   
   
     
    
Since: 8.5.02
From: San Diego, CA
Since last post: 732 days
Last activity: 578 days
| | | Y!: |  |
|
|  #2 Posted on 25.4.05 1759.46 | Instant Rating: 2.96 | And he's right. Bettman and Goodenow should step aside if they are unwilling to do the deal. I think both of them will lose their jobs when or if a CBA gets done.
"You have to vote for one of us. It's a two party system. HAHAHAHAHA!" -- Kang and Kodos | BigVitoMark
Lap cheong
Since: 10.8.02
From: Queen's University, Canada
Since last post: 2859 days
Last activity: 2768 days
| | ICQ: |  |
| |
|  #3 Posted on 29.4.05 2333.20 | Instant Rating: 3.01 | Hard to argue with the man. The only time there seemed to be any progress in this mess was when it was Bill Daly, Ted Saskin, Trevor Linden, and basically anyone not named Gary Bettman or Bob Goodenow leading the charge. But screw it, we'll be having this same "get them outta there, we need a deal done now" argument in six months, so I'll save thoughts on that for then.
    |
| |
Thread rated: 3.20
