User Post (7 total)
LakeEffect Loukanika Since: 7.3.12 From: I-43 Corridor Since last post: 1827 days Last activity: 1827 days # 1 Posted on 12.4.12 1447.44 | Instant Rating: 2.25 Who should be looked upon more favorably? Who is more at fault for the TNA ratings being in the toilet? These two will be forever linked. This is going to sound far fetched, but I think you can honestly compare Eric Bischoff to Joe Namath. Both fought the established thought of one league (or fed) was superior to the other. Both seemingly had basically 2 or 3 good years. ( Namath had 1969, and 1972, Bischoff late 96-early 98). Both struggled to rekindle previous success (Namath with the Rams, Bischoff in TNA). Namath rode Super Bowl 3 into the Hall of Fame, despite throwing 47 more interceptions than TDs and barely completely 50% of his passes. Bischoff has lived off the success of the NWO and really hasn't done much successful since. Thoughts? Promote this thread!
Scottyflamingo Bratwurst Since: 23.6.10 From: Auburn, AL Since last post: 1466 days Last activity: 1194 days # 2 Posted on 13.4.12 1623.56 | Instant Rating: 2.43 Russo's stint for the two months before Hogan got there was better than anything they've done since, so he wins.
Brian Salami Since: 13.11.11 From: Virginia Beach Since last post: 736 days Last activity: 91 days # 3 Posted on 13.4.12 1642.57 | Instant Rating: 1.31 Yeah lethal jobbing to niedhart and tatanka was awesome so was the Eric Young monster push. (edited by Brian on 13.4.12 1743)
Papadoc Bauerwurst Since: 14.1.04 From: NY Since last post: 493 days Last activity: 6 days # 4 Posted on 14.4.12 1928.28 | Instant Rating: 9.31 I think with Russo, his heart was in the right place. He wanted to push younger stars, make the company succeed, etc.. He just had retarded means to get there sometimes. Bischoff, on the other hand, could care less.. just wants to make money and be able to suck off C-level celebrities..
graves9 Sujuk Since: 19.2.10 From: Brooklyn NY Since last post: 397 days Last activity: 3 days # 5 Posted on 14.4.12 2001.58 | Instant Rating: 4.42 Russo always pushed older stars after he left the WWE. He fubar'd so many promising young wrestlers careers. Ask Samoa Joe about that. Originally posted by Papadoc I think with Russo, his heart was in the right place. He wanted to push younger stars, make the company succeed, etc.. He just had retarded means to get there sometimes. Bischoff, on the other hand, could care less.. just wants to make money and be able to suck off C-level celebrities..
wannaberockstar Frankfurter Since: 7.3.02 Since last post: 296 days Last activity: 282 days # 6 Posted on 14.4.12 2132.16 | Instant Rating: 3.84 If I had to choose between Russo and Bischoff, I'd choose Dutch Mantell. Russo had somethings going for him, but the stupid overshadowed the good. Bischoff has nothing good going for him, at all.
CHAPLOW Morcilla Since: 14.5.04 From: right behind you Since last post: 1132 days Last activity: 370 days # 7 Posted on 14.4.12 2233.12 | Instant Rating: 9.33
You're all wrong, I think this thread has gone on for... THREE MINUTES too long. Please take a minute to follow my graphic design/animation team :] on Facebook www.facebook.com/teamrenegade on Twitter @teamrenegadehq
Let me give this one a try. In the year 2004 I think the following will happen: Nash and Hall will be gone, but Hogan will still be around in some form or fashion with the WWF.
The W message board ZimBoard ©2001-2017 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.466 seconds.