The W
Views: 98992091
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
18.9.14 0252
The W - Football - Big Ben takes a licking, but....
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.91
Pages: 1
(1358 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
JoshMann
Andouille








Since: 17.11.03
From: Tallahassee, FL

Since last post: 2257 days
Last activity: 2254 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.12
For the Steeler Fan W's:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9662832/

According to initial diagnosis, Rothelisberger's knee injury is merely a bone bruise/hyperextension and isn't anything more serious than that and could possibly play next week versus Jacksonville.

I know that my Steeler-fan girlfriend was having a fit at the possibility of anything worse, and watching the play that it happened, this was definitely the best-case scenario.

(edited by Blanket Jackson on 11.10.05 1313)


"He's too much of gentleman to assume that the lady he is with would have a disease and he's man enough to raise any offspring that should arise. HE IS AL WILSON."[-DEAN~, 7/22/05]
Promote this thread!
HitTheSnoozeButton
Boudin rouge








Since: 2.1.02
From: Pittsburgh PA

Since last post: 2054 days
Last activity: 404 days
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.55
First off, the game itself nearly gave me a coronary, and that was before Ben got hit. I believe at that point my life flashed before my eyes (as did Shapiro's, I'm sure). Honestly, all I could think of when I saw the replays was the Willis McGahee injury in the National Title game against OSU. Luckily for Big Ben and the Steelers, he wasn't really moving when he got hit and he wasn't jarred as hard as McGahee was during his play. I won't be surprised to see him play against the Jags.



Steelers: 2-0
Pens: Run to the Cup starts soon
JustinShapiro
Scrapple
Moderator








Since: 12.12.01
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 5 hours
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.46
BEN LIVES clap clap

I'll tell you what made me want to puke all over their heads, sir, was that fair catch interference call on a ball that dude volleyball-set 3 feet ahead of him. If the rule is you get to have a perpetual fair catch of the ball until you actually get it, then I would just continuously juggle it forward for a touchdown.
HitTheSnoozeButton
Boudin rouge








Since: 2.1.02
From: Pittsburgh PA

Since last post: 2054 days
Last activity: 404 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.55
The worst part is that Cowher played it off in the postgame press conference with the whole, "Oh, no, they were absolutely correct on that call," routine. Some vicious cussing would have been nice, and at least consistent with his in-game reaction.

For once I would have to agree with Al Michaels and John Madden, both of whom correctly stated that it was a "stupid rule." The ball was clearly going to hit the ground if ol' Chidi hadn't been barging in to snatch it. It was Darren freaking Sproles for Chrissakes--he's 5 foot nothing, he isn't going to go Stretch Armstrong and grab a ball three feet in front of and moving away from him.

That said...they won, so who cares.

(edited by HitTheSnoozeButton on 12.10.05 0029)


Steelers: 2-0
Pens: Run to the Cup starts soon
JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 15 days
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.56
    Originally posted by HitTheSnoozeButton
    The worst part is that Cowher played it off in the postgame press conference with the whole, "Oh, no, they were absolutely correct on that call," routine. Some vicious cussing would have been nice, and at least consistent with his in-game reaction.

    For once I would have to agree with Al Michaels and John Madden, both of whom correctly stated that it was a "stupid rule." The ball was clearly going to hit the ground if ol' Chidi hadn't been barging in to snatch it. It was Darren freaking Sproles for Chrissakes--he's 5 foot nothing, he isn't going to go Stretch Armstrong and grab a ball three feet in front of and moving away from him.


Obviously, I'm biased because the "Tuck Rule"-game turned out in my team's favor, but I didn't have a problem with the call or the rule because I'm all in favor of taking away judgment calls, and making it not offically a muffed punt until it hits the ground makes it a black-or-white deal.

That said, I think they should revisit the severity of the penalty, maybe not making it a "penalty" at all but still awarding the receiving team the ball at that spot, because there clearly wasn't intent to interfere with a fair catch on the part of the defender, he was just making a great play. I thought adding a fifteen-yard penalty was too severe.



"You know what you need?
Some new quotes in your sig.
Yeah, I said it."
-- DJFrostyFreeze

Thread rated: 6.91
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 5
Next thread: Let's play two!
Previous thread: Strategic Question
(1358 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
You would need to reverse that because Arkansas already lost to Alabama, but do play LSU. That is the Texas/Texas Tech/Oklahoma situation from a few years ago.
- redsoxnation, 2011 BCS Standings: Week 2 of 8 (2011)
Related threads: Big Ben - Offensive Rookie of the Year - Pete Weber - Agh! No Steelers' game, make Fan angry - More...
The W - Football - Big Ben takes a licking, but....Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.107 seconds.