The W
Views: 100922264
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.11.14 1934
The W - Baseball - batting .400 and switching leagues
This thread has 12 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1(1211 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
ShotGunShep
Frankfurter








Since: 20.2.03

Since last post: 2573 days
Last activity: 2459 days
#1 Posted on
I got a question for all the baseball buffs out there. Let's say a player is batting well over .400 for most of hte season. He gets traded during the year for 4 other great players. His BA resets to zero, doesn't it? So if he bats over .400 in the other league, does he get credit for his average?
Promote this thread!
PeterStork
Sujuk








Since: 25.1.02
From: Chicagoland with Hoosiers, or "The Region"

Since last post: 76 days
Last activity: 3 days
#2 Posted on
Yes to both questions, that is if he has the required at-bats to win the batting title.

In 1990, Willie McGee won the National League batting title.

As a member of the Oakland Athletics. (Of the American League, for the uninitated. The rest of you may let out a loud, scorching "DUH.")

He was traded from the Cardinals in late August (for FELIX JOSE~!) and had already batted enough times to qualify. Obviously, if you're traded at the All-Star Break or just after you might not have enough plate appearances, but by mid-August most batters have qualified.

Willie also had a batting average with the Athletics, though not one large enough to compete for the AL batting crown.



exit 670 dot com

Fuck the Emmys.

Bullitt
Shot in the dark








Since: 11.1.02
From: Houston

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 13 days
#3 Posted on
I think with interleague play now, though, those stats SHOULD carry over.




You kids like the rock 'n roll music? Then here's Matthew Good.
odessasteps
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: MD, USA

Since last post: 163 days
Last activity: 130 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.41

I was under the impression that, with all the changes to MLB over the last four or five years, stats were merged together from both leagues. (This goes along with one set of umpires and the elimination of the AL/NL presidents.)




Odessa Steps Magazine
http://www.odessasteps.com
http://odessasteps.blogspot.com
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1305 days
Last activity: 1101 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
Nope. League stats are still seperate.

Incdientally, even if you don't have enough at-bats to qualify in the one league. You could still qualify. Exmaple: If Player A is leading the leauge and only has 475 PA, they will add 27 more PA to his total and recalcucalte the average. If the recalcualted average still leads the league, then the player wins the batting title with his real average.



"If this cruel, loudmouth extremist is the cream of the Democratic crop, next November's going to make the 1984 election look like a squeaker."
--House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) on Howard Dean
JayJayDean
Scrapple








Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 hour
AIM:  
Y!:
#6 Posted on
I think, though, that if Player X hit .410 from April - August, then hit .200 in September on his new team, he wouldn't (and shouldn't) get the love for hitting .400. A few guys like Brett and Gwynn have been at or near .400 on September 1 and fallen short, and I think this guy would fall under the same category as those guys.



Washington Huskies, 1-1. USC didn't look THAT great after the first quarter, so I'm more optimistic that they'll be the 2003 Pac-10 champs.
Grimis
Scrapple








Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1305 days
Last activity: 1101 days
#7 Posted on | Instant Rating: 7.29
Hey may not get the love, but he might get the batting title at .410. Those are the rules...



Pages: 1Thread ahead: So much for the all-Chicago World Series
Next thread: Cards done..... any good free agent pitchers gonna be available next season?
Previous thread: Somewhere, Brian Kingman cries.
(1211 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
I would have voted for Bautista. while Verlander was great this year he wasn’t historically great like Doc was in ’85 or Pedro was in ’99 and neither guy won the Mvp
- graves9, Verlander AL MVP (2011)
The W - Baseball - batting .400 and switching leaguesRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.092 seconds.