The W
Views: 95772643
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.4.14 2300
The W - Print - Batman: Earth One
This thread has 21 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 4.86
Pages: 1
(96 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
John Orquiola
Scrapple








Since: 28.2.02
From: Boston

Since last post: 132 days
Last activity: 96 days
#1 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.26
A slightly embellished version of what's below at Back of the Head, with pretty picture. (backofthehead.com)

I might as well just accept the conclusion I've come to that I just do not like Geoff Johns' comics. I just don't. I don't get why he's so celebrated. I don't find his writing anything special or extraordinary where he's one of the mega talents of the comic book industry and one of the Powers that Be in DC. I understand many people love the guy and his books $ell. Hell, I got Batman: Earth One because of the hype, and because of Gary Frank. Him, I do like. His artwork is fantastic.

Gary Frank's art aside, I don't know if I could have enjoyed Batman: Earth One less. For everyone who complained about The Amazing Spider-Man and "why do we need to see the origin again?", well, here's Batman's origin again. It's different for the sake of being different. Is it a better origin of The Batman? No. Not at all (pretty art aside). If anything, it makes Bruce Wayne less admirable and a hell of a lot less likable. Maybe it's a more 'realistic' spin, if that means anything to a story about a billionaire who dresses up as a bat to hunt criminals. I'll give Johns this: He used maybe ten cocktail napkins to write this story as opposed to the one he uses for each issue of Justice League.

So, what's different in Earth One?

Spoilers:


Thomas Wayne was running for Mayor and was on track to win when he was killed. His death was a hit by the man who is now Mayor of Gotham City, Oswald Cobblepot. (I did like this version of Penguin and the hints of Batman Returns in Oswald being mayor. Especially how disgustingly he eats.) The hit however failed when little 10 year old asshole Bruce Wayne caused his parents to go into an alley and get killed by a common criminal. Either way, Waynes are dead and Oswald got what he wanted.

Martha Wayne's maiden name is Arkham. She's Martha Arkham-Wayne, and she grew up in a condemned old house currently housing a serial killer that may or may not become Arkham Asylum in future Earth One installments.

Bruce Wayne is incompetent as Batman. This is, of course, "realistic". His Batgrapple gun and other gadgets don't work. His cape is just a cape (until it isn't). He's not the best trained or best detective in the world. He's really not very good at all. He's arrogant and foolish and stupid. Nor did he apparently travel the world to learn his skills. Alfred taught him how to fight.

Alfred is the biggest change, and this is because of Downton Abbey. Alfred was a war buddy of Thomas Wayne who saved his life in the desert and lost his leg. So in gratitude, Thomas brought Alfred on to be his butler. Johns swiped this wholesale right from Downton Abbey. Alfred is a bad ass in this story, and he thinks Bruce is an idiot and Batman is a stupid idea, and he saves Bruce's life more than once. Because Bruce is an idiot and Alfred is right.

Gordon is a weak cop who finds his mojo to become a better cop. His wife is dead and Barbara Gordon is in the story, who later is inspired by Batman to start wanting to be Batgirl. She is also kidnapped and nearly killed but isn't shot through the spine. (No Joker in the story.)

Harvey Dent is still DA but he has a twin sister Jessica, who's Cobblepot's main political rival. Neither Dent becomes Two-Face.

Harvey Bullock is a handsome, TV star cop shades of Kevin Spacey in LA Confidential who comes to Gotham to find out who really murdered Thomas and Martha Wayne, then gets embroiled in the seedy criminal world of Gotham. By the end, he starts drinking.

Finally, Lucius Fox is here, he's younger, and he works for Bruce Wayne as his Q, building him Bat gadgets that actually work.

By the end, knowing he barely survived his own incompetence several times, Bruce and Alfred decide that they need "to build a better Batman". What does that mean? Don't know. Suddenly Batman is back in action and we're meant to presume he's 'better'. If they were going to build a better Batman, I wish they'd started with this graphic novel.

(edited by John Orquiola on 6.7.12 2032)

@CMPunk
“@ZackRyder: @CMPunk She played me bro” I got your back.
Promote this thread!
Matt Tracker
Scrapple








Since: 8.5.03
From: North Carolina

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
#2 Posted on | Instant Rating: 8.12
    Originally posted by John Orquiola
    Bruce Wayne is incompetent as Batman. This is, of course, "realistic". His Batgrapple gun and other gadgets don't work. His cape is just a cape (until it isn't). He's not the best trained or best detective in the world. He's really not very good at all. Nor did he apparently travel the world to learn his skills. Alfred taught him how to fight.



I realized last night reading Ultimate Spider-Man that I don't like the latest crop of young heroes because I'm not interesting in seeing heroes learn on the job. It was fine in Miller/Mazzuchelli's Batman Year One because we hadn't seen Batman go through that before. Now, it's a trope.



"To be the man, you gotta beat demands." -- The Lovely Mrs. Tracker
lotjx
Scrapple








Since: 5.9.08

Since last post: 15 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
#3 Posted on | Instant Rating: 1.24
    Originally posted by Matt Tracker
      Originally posted by John Orquiola
      Bruce Wayne is incompetent as Batman. This is, of course, "realistic". His Batgrapple gun and other gadgets don't work. His cape is just a cape (until it isn't). He's not the best trained or best detective in the world. He's really not very good at all. Nor did he apparently travel the world to learn his skills. Alfred taught him how to fight.



    I realized last night reading Ultimate Spider-Man that I don't like the latest crop of young heroes because I'm not interesting in seeing heroes learn on the job. It was fine in Miller/Mazzuchelli's Batman Year One because we hadn't seen Batman go through that before. Now, it's a trope.


Pretty much the reason, I have opted out of New 52. I like Johns, but I can see where this could and is a mess. Too many good ideas, Penguin as Mayor, Bad Ass Alfred and not so ugly Bullock going into the Wayne murders. Its just seems like too much stuff going on while still dealing with the Gordons. I get the feeling "realistic" Bruce being a dick is to modernize him, because every dark hero is now a massive dick. Bruce can be a dick, but not right away. Year One did a great job humbling him and making him human while learning from his mistakes. You take the learning out of the equation then its Kick Ass.



The Wee Baby Sheamus.Twitter: @realjoecarfley its a bit more toned down there. A bit.
John Orquiola
Scrapple








Since: 28.2.02
From: Boston

Since last post: 132 days
Last activity: 96 days
#4 Posted on | Instant Rating: 6.26
    Originally posted by lotjx

    I realized last night reading Ultimate Spider-Man that I don't like the latest crop of young heroes because I'm not interesting in seeing heroes learn on the job. It was fine in Miller/Mazzuchelli's Batman Year One because we hadn't seen Batman go through that before. Now, it's a trope.


Pretty much the reason, I have opted out of New 52.


Well, in defense of The New 52, the young heroes learning on the job trope only really applies to Action Comics, still set 5 years ago, and the first 6 issues of Justice League, also set 5 years ago. Most New 52 books now, with a few exceptions like Earth 2, have most of the heroes within 5 years of active duty, especially the Bat and Green Lantern books, which never actually rebooted. So almost every DC hero knows what they're doing more or less.



@CMPunk
“@ZackRyder: @CMPunk She played me bro” I got your back.
Scottyflamingo
Bratwurst








Since: 23.6.10
From: Auburn, AL

Since last post: 279 days
Last activity: 8 days
#5 Posted on | Instant Rating: 2.41
My hold pile was huge from months of not going to the comic shop and this was in it. Instead of rehashing others thoughts:

-I like how they used a completely new villain in the story.

-NO JOKER! Loved this. Glad he's been gone awhile.

-The next villain. A character that doesn't get near the hype he deserves.

Thread rated: 4.86
Pages: 1
Thread ahead: DC 1yr subscriptions for $12/$13 1 day only.
Next thread: Harry Harrison 1925-2012
Previous thread: RIP Gore Vidal (1925-2012)
(96 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
in no particular order Bandette Hawkeye Chew Fatale Saga Hickman's Avengers Daredevil Journey into Mystery Usagi Yojimbo Did Casanova come out in 2012? Don't remember at the moment.
- odessasteps, Favorite Comics of 2012. (2013)
Related threads: Before Watchmen: Ozymandias #1 - Death of the Family (The Return of The Joker) - Before Watchmen: The Comedian #1 - More...
The W - Print - Batman: Earth OneRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.068 seconds.