The W
WrestleMania 33 begins in 680,958 seconds
Views: 121903665
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
25.3.17 2050
The W - Pro Wrestling - Austin (Page 2)
This thread has 8 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: Prev 1 2(14366 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (23 total)

Since: 15.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 4724 days
Last activity: 4724 days
#21 Posted on
It's gotta be an angle. I'm sure he has been in situations before where he may not have liked the direction his character was going. It's part of the bizness right.

Besides, He wouldn't be mentioned on T.V or on the website. If there was really a problem. Vince don't play that shit, Stone Cold would essentially disappear.

"NOW YOU GET YOUR WHININ ASS OUTTA HERE!!" Sid Vicious after slapping Bret Hart

Since: 4.1.02
From: Chicago

Since last post: 726 days
Last activity: 2 days
#22 Posted on
Well, none of us will really know for sure what to make of this until all is said and done (I'm starting to lean towards shoot turned into a work, though based on what we saw on TV last night). But what I do know is that the internet is REALLY trying to make this out to be a HUGE thing for thier own purposes.

For instance, on the Torch instead of reporting what they know, Keller is trying to tell us that Austin was barely mentioned on Raw, and that this is cause for concern. Uh, did he think we didn't watch the f'n show? They made a BIG deal out of Austin's free agent status. It was mentioned at the top of the show along with the announcement for the rules for champions, Lawler and JR talked about it several times, and Flair and Vince made it seem like it was vital to their group to sign Austin. So how can Keller go and claim that not much was made of Austin? To me it made Austin seem even MORE important than he was before.

As much heat as the WWF had for the "meadia ban" announcement last week, I am in agreement with them when they say some peopel are trying to further their own agendas.
Lap cheong

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 717 days
Last activity: 641 days
#23 Posted on
I think even if there were problems, they are taken care of now. I figure if the problems still existed (if they ever did), then, outside of mentioning that Austin wouldn't be drafted, we wouldn't have heard his name the rest of the night. As it was, they were pushing the signing of Austin as a big deal. In other words, they were pushing it as a major plot point for future shows. I don't think they would do that if there was some doubt whether or not he was going to show up.

(Edit: Er, I guess I could have saved time by posting "Yeah, what Eradicator said!". I need to start actually reading all the posts!)

(edited by ges7184 on 26.3.02 1225)
Pages: Prev 1 2
Pages: Prev 1 2Thread ahead: YES!
Next thread: Rey in WWF and Eddy coming back
Previous thread: Is HHH losing the fire, promowise?
(14366 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Why confrontation? Nash and HBK were on the same side before he went on his injury last summer. I think a Nash-HHH confrontation might be more inevitable. Can't wait for Big Daddy to prove everyone wrong!
- darkmatcher, Kevin Nash WWE Return! (2003)
Related threads: Brock Lesnar - HOLY CRAP! - Was anyone else impressed with Y2J on RAW? - More...
The W - Pro Wrestling - Austin (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

©2001-2017 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.707 seconds.