The W
Views: 88100629
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Calendar | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.5.13 2042
The W - Baseball - A's Down to "one Ace" (Page 2)
This thread has 10 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Thread rated: 6.03
Pages: Prev 1 2
(818 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (21 total)
SC
Potato korv








Since: 11.12.01
From: Valparaiso, IN

Since last post: 806 days
Last activity: 140 days
AIM:  
#21 Posted on 21.12.04 0739.17 | Instant Rating: 8.80
I think I see what he's saying, but I won't assume I do. I don't think he's disagreeing with the fact that they had pretty much the same year, but with the way I said it.

And since I'm posting, what I meant to say was in response to the idea (and fact) of Zito being a wild card every time out this year, and that Mulder really wasn't. He was a relative sure thing for most of the season, but collapsed in such dramatic fashion that despite his several good months, his overall worth on the season was the same as Zito, who was perceived as having a bad year while Mulder only had a bunch of bad starts at the end and prior to that was pretty good.

It was more a point to a statement of a previous post than it was something to be taken by itself. So sure, if you take it out of context, it's kind of daft.



| .com | oriole blue | tcf.com |
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread rated: 6.03
Pages: Prev 1 2
Thread ahead: Nationals: One and done?
Next thread: Hudson to Braves
Previous thread: The Mariners are making my head spin
(818 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
That's nice thinking and all, but c'mon man, you're talking about the Cubs here. He probably would've been the 60s version of Dwight Gooden with their luck. That's like putting a Jeff Bagwell Red Sox card up there.
Related threads: Jason Kendall traded to the A's - AL West race sputters down the stretch - Oakland Athletics logo - More...
The W - Baseball - A's Down to "one Ace" (Page 2)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board

ZimBoard
©2001-2013 Brothers Zim

This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.144 seconds.