Greetings, fellow Wieners. I'm a wrestling fan, but the recent wane in interesting and entertaining storylines has gradually led me away from ordering pay-per-views every month, instead I just stick to the weekly shows and the occation big-time PPV (SummerSlam was the last I saw, and I'm going to watch Royal Rumble & WrestleMania). Tomorrow night, an arguably weak-looking Armageddon PPV event will be taking place...coincidentally the same night (and in some timeslots, the same time) as the much-anticipated Survivor: Pearl Islands finale. With Survivor's seventh edition pulling in high ratings and the RAW brand (and WWE in general) pulling down lower than usual ratings, does anybody else foresee low buyrates for the show?
FLAMES: 13-8-1-3; 30pts SURVIVOR: PEARL ISLANDS: 5 Remain [Darrah, Jon, Sandra, Burton & Lillian] TOP 10 FILMS OF 2003 [So Far]: Mystic River, Lost In Translation, Finding Nemo, Seabiscuit, Kill Bill V1, X2: X-Men United, Open Range, Pirates of the Caribbean, Matchstick Men & The Last Samurai
I think it gets a low buyrate due to it being a brand exclusive show, and it being a December PPV that historically hasn't been viewed as much more than a throw-away show between Survivor Series and Rumble. Survivor might take a marginal piece of the audience, but its doubtful as that show goes head to head against weekly WWF/E programming, so the cross-over audience in all likelihood isn't as great as if they weren't competing shows on Thursday.
I don't think you can credit a low buyrate - which I agree is coming - to the Survivor finale. December PPVs are traditionally one of the weaker ones of the year, both in terms of quality and importance to storylines. Like redsoxnation said, it's filler, and nothing on the card tomorrow is all that remarkable. I'm the type who orders whatever they throw out there, mostly because I've got a bunch of people to split the cost with me, but if I were a more discriminating buyer I'd probably take a pass on the strength of the show, regardless of whether Survivor is on or not.
The Toronto Maple Leafs are built for the playoffs. Of course they are. What Leafs fans don't realize, though, is "built for the playoffs" is just GM-speak for "short on skill, kinda slow, and can't score over an 80 game season".
Thread ahead: 12.13.03 Confidential - Trish+Chris Cutest Canadian Couple since um um ? Eeeever Next thread: Armageddon officially not on UK TV Previous thread: The Great Thomas SmackDown Report 12/11/03
Is this a shill? Because I believe we'd rather not have those in Wrestling, and since this is the same exact shill that's posted on a billion newsboards every Monday, I'm not sure the world needs yet another copy. Is this a repost?