Originally posted by StaggerLeeI find it funny, that in the age of computers and world wide global information, some people can only forumulate opinions based on what other people write and what other people feel. Furthermore I find it strange that people who hate person A Cannot ever find a single thing that Person A ever did that was good. Person A must be evil all the time, or the hatred is not allowable.
I didnt care for Clinton as a president. But, he did do a lot of things that got the nation in a better place IE eliminating most of Welfare and getting the economy strong.
I dont like a lot of things that Bush does economy wise, but I respect him for being able to do the job he has had since 9/11.
If you are a brainwashed "Republicans are BAD" type, thats sad for you. If you are a brainwashed "Democrats are BAD" type, it is said as well.
Too bad people cant judge things on a case by case basis.
I do that as much as possible. I care little from President to President (they are all corrupt in my opinion).
It seems to boil down to: which one is lesser fo 2 evils?
But when it comes to Bush Jr., I have a hard time finding just about anything good. So far the only one I can think of was going into Afganistan looking for the parties directly responsible for 9/11.
Other than that, it seems to be a bunch of self serving crap.
But don't get me wrong, I think all the other Presidents suck too, just not *as much* as Bush Jr. does.
I would like to congatulate Al Snow on his contact with La-Z-Boy. Because we all know Al doesn't sell chairs. - Mick Foley
Back to the "bias" question. There is no unbiased reporting. 1. Editor/ reporter decide on assignment. 2. Reporter gathers information. 3. Reporter and/or editor decides what is pertinent to put in. 4.