The W
Views: 99342643
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
30.9.07 0917
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Coming Soon: To an America Near YOU! Register and log in to post!
(1872 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 907/4700
EXP: 21528313
For next: 308349

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1246 days
Last activity: 1043 days
#1 Posted on 5.2.03 0659.39
Reposted on: 5.2.10 0703.59
Click Here

The above link refers to conservative billionaire Taki Theodoracopoulos, who is being investgated and may be prosecuted in the UK for so-called "hate speech" for a controversial columni he wrote in a London newspaper.

This is the kind of nonsense certain pressure groups wish to bring to American shores and is consistent with the so-called "PC police" that attack certain American celebrities and politicians.

Nobody is saying what Taki said was right(or even acceptable). But I for one am glad that we still retain the protections of the 1st Amendment(at least for now...)
Promote this thread!
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 463/1528
EXP: 4074563
For next: 116585

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2807 days
Last activity: 2649 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on 5.2.03 0720.46
Reposted on: 5.2.10 0723.25
Can you believe Scotland Yard has a "Diveristy Directorate?" Yikes.
vsp
Andouille
Level: 87

Posts: 838/2042
EXP: 6294245
For next: 98554

Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 3010 days
Last activity: 224 days
#3 Posted on 5.2.03 0904.12
Reposted on: 5.2.10 0905.10
Taki's missing his calling. If he were to move to America, he'd have four nationally-syndicated radio show offers before he even got off the plane...
ScreamingHeadGuy
Frankfurter
Level: 56

Posts: 139/743
EXP: 1377137
For next: 21048

Since: 1.2.02
From: Appleton, WI

Since last post: 725 days
Last activity: 725 days
#4 Posted on 5.2.03 0913.53
Reposted on: 5.2.10 0923.30
I, for one, am wondering what this law that he's being prosecuted under, is. Is it common to use this law for instances like this? Could one of our British wieners please shed some light on the situation?

Also, if the editor of the paper was on vacation that week, shouldn't the guy in his place have, maybe, axed the column himself?
dMr
Andouille
Level: 89

Posts: 272/2212
EXP: 6861449
For next: 54479

Since: 2.11.02
From: Edinburgh, Scotland

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 7 hours
#5 Posted on 5.2.03 1233.40
Reposted on: 5.2.10 1237.38

    Originally posted by ScreamingHeadGuy
    I, for one, am wondering what this law that he's being prosecuted under, is. Is it common to use this law for instances like this? Could one of our British wieners please shed some light on the situation?


I'll do my best.

While obviously we pride ourselves over here on being pretty liberal with regards freedom of speech, there are laws governing the publication of literature that is judged to be written in a manner that could incite racial hatred.

It would be acceptable say for somebody to write a column saying that Britain needs to tighten border controls in order to prevent the flow of illegal immigrants into the country.

What would not be legal would be posting leaflets that say "Pakis and Blacks are stealng our jobs. Our government is doing nothing to stop this, so its up to you to fight back and rid our proud nation of this cancer."

I think the idea is basically its fine to hold strong beliefs and to state them, but if its done in a manner that is likely to lead to violence then thats pretty naughty and frowned upon.

The first time I became aware of it was when that loveable bunch of racists the BNP (or at least one of their members) was charged as a result of some leaflets he posted round his neighborhood which were basically full of lies about how x% of the Asians in the community were there illegaly and should be removed by 'any means necessary' (I'm paraphrasing but you get the idea).

If memory serves (and I'm getting old so it quite often doesn't) The Nation Of Islam were also in danger of being prosecuted under this law due to their actions during the Steven Lawrence case but I dont know if that ever came to anything.

In response to Grimis's original post, I agree with the principal of the law. We allowed a group of Islamic extremists to march near the anniversary of 9/11 over here because they did so in a peaceful manner. Theres no reason why anyone cant express there opinions without resorting to the sort of shit thats only purpose is to induce riots
ges7184
Lap cheong
Level: 76

Posts: 561/1494
EXP: 3937208
For next: 68871

Since: 7.1.02
From: Birmingham, AL

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#6 Posted on 6.2.03 2027.40
Reposted on: 6.2.10 2029.01
Words and opinions should never induce riots, PERIOD. That's just a lame excuse.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: What a difference a decade makes
Next thread: Question on flying the flag
Previous thread: In the spirit of bipartisanship
(1872 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Coming Soon: To an America Near YOU!Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.213 seconds.