The W
Views: 106191561
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
4.8.08 2334
The 7 - Random - Windows Register and log in to post!
(3872 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (15 total)
LeechOfTheNight
Head cheese
Level: 39

Posts: 20/317
EXP: 397015
For next: 7760

Since: 16.1.02
From: New Hampshire

Since last post: 4465 days
Last activity: 3607 days
#1 Posted on 27.1.02 1800.42
Reposted on: 27.1.09 1807.04
What's the difference between Windows XP, 2000, and NT? I currently have Windows ME on my computer, but I think its the reason for all these problems its having. For example, if its on for any more than maybe two hours, it starts getting really slow and I'm forced to restart it. it's incredibly annoying and I'm thinking that a new OS may be in order.



"Me: Oh, I never watched WCW.

Booker: Why not?

Me: Because WCW is 4 FAGZ!

Booker: Goodbye.

Me: GOODBYE YOU FAGGOT!

(interview ends)

whgat a homosexual booker tea si!"

--Hot Newz
Promote this thread!
Mike Sweetser
Boerewors
Level: 42

Posts: 39/379
EXP: 519765
For next: 1601

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, Washington

Since last post: 3369 days
Last activity: 3261 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on 27.1.02 2232.07
Reposted on: 27.1.09 2257.32
NT, 2000 and XP are different versions of the same basic OS.

NT = version 4.0. Hence, why it's called NT4.
2000 = NT5. The next version up.
XP = NT5.1.

Go with XP.

Mike



(image removed)

That's The Spirit, Thing, Lend A Hand!
(image removed)
Mike Sweetser: Putting The Ball In Pinball

MikeSweetser.com ~ WOWE.com
mikesweetser@mikesweetser.com


Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 108

Posts: 30/3273
EXP: 13162506
For next: 358037

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 484 days
Last activity: 285 days
#3 Posted on 29.1.02 1054.48
Reposted on: 29.1.09 1059.14
Isn't Windows 2000 still DOS based, thus making it not a remake of NT? Personally, knowing Microsoft, I'd go for 2000 until I was sure there weren't any huge bugs in XP.


-Jag
I used to fix computers for my school. Now I don't even bother to learn. They all crash anyway.
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator
Level: 141

Posts: 316/6086
EXP: 33526231
For next: 593867

Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 29.1.02 1515.44
Reposted on: 29.1.09 1520.13
Nope. It's NT based. No dos.

You are thinking of Windows Millenium, or ME



I love it when a plan comes together
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 108

Posts: 50/3273
EXP: 13162506
For next: 358037

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 484 days
Last activity: 285 days
#5 Posted on 29.1.02 1518.09
Reposted on: 29.1.09 1520.35
Ah. Well, now I know.

-Jaguar
cfgb
Bierwurst
Level: 85

Posts: 171/1907
EXP: 5866520
For next: 32044

Since: 2.1.02
From: Ottawa, Ontario

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 hour
#6 Posted on 29.1.02 1525.13
Reposted on: 29.1.09 1529.04
I currently have Windows ME on my computer, but I think its the reason for all these problems its having. For example, if its on for any more than maybe two hours, it starts getting really slow and I'm forced to restart it. it's incredibly annoying and I'm thinking that a new OS may be in order.

You know, I hear this from ALL KINDS of people who have ME. EVERYONE complains about it.

I have it. I have yet to experience any kind of problems like the ones I hear about so often. In fact, this has been the best version of windows I've ever used to be honest.

Bill Gates made ME a happy user, so I guess he can sleep easy at night or something.




Contact cfgb
Visit my homepage
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator
Level: 141

Posts: 317/6086
EXP: 33526231
For next: 593867

Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 29.1.02 2008.01
Reposted on: 29.1.09 2029.04
I have ME dual booting with Windows XP on my system. I'm not sure how that works legally since the XP is an upgrade copy on my ME license, but we'll ignore that for now and pretend it is all kosher (hell, it should be, I can't use them both at once).

Ok, so ME worked really well for 2 months. That's actually pretty good for a MS OS in my care. Now it blue screens sometimes randomly while burning CDs. Very annoying.

XP is rock solid. I have no stability complaints with it. I use 2000 at work, and I don't have any issues, but I do a lot less at work - I didn't really have problems with Win 95 at work either.

ME seems to do weird things if you upgrade IE. I never had problems until I did that.



I love it when a plan comes together
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 108

Posts: 71/3273
EXP: 13162506
For next: 358037

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 484 days
Last activity: 285 days
#8 Posted on 29.1.02 2035.09
Reposted on: 29.1.09 2059.09
Oooh, I think I remember hearing something about ME and the new IE not working together.... couldn't really tell you anything though. I basically hate computers right now. Maybe I'll learn to love them again in college. Probably not...


-jag
rte66usa
Polska kielbasa
Level: 27

Posts: 65/134
EXP: 109267
For next: 6893

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 4908 days
Last activity: 4904 days
#9 Posted on 29.1.02 2100.22
Reposted on: 29.1.09 2108.26
I didn't have any issues with ME that I wasn't already having with 98...but I also got ME as the result of a new desktop purchase, not an upgrade, so maybe that had something to do with it.

XP is, as Guru noted, rock solid. Scanning images used to mean all applications were frozen while the scan was in progress. But with XP, I can scan in the background and perform other important tasks (like overposting in Wienerville.)

(NOTE to Jaguar - I meant "XP". Thanks for the catch.)

(edited by rte66usa on 31.1.02 1834)
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 108

Posts: 80/3273
EXP: 13162506
For next: 358037

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 484 days
Last activity: 285 days
#10 Posted on 30.1.02 1051.33
Reposted on: 30.1.09 1059.04
Did you mean, ME or XP in that last sentence?
LeechOfTheNight
Head cheese
Level: 39

Posts: 45/317
EXP: 397015
For next: 7760

Since: 16.1.02
From: New Hampshire

Since last post: 4465 days
Last activity: 3607 days
#11 Posted on 4.2.02 1559.35
Reposted on: 4.2.09 1559.43
OK, thanks for all your help and I think I'm going to purchase Windows XP. I have just one question, what's up with all these different versions? I know that there's Home and professional which is all well and good, but then there's all these different versions within versions. For example, I keep seeing phrases like full version, OEM version, full OEM version, upgrade version and DSP version being tossed around and I don't know which is which. Actually, I'm looking to buy this copy, http://www.z-buy.com/cgi-bin/pickup.cgi?ITEM=DC-MSWXPHEMSUSB&SELECT=other&cust_id=1964879, so if anyoen sees any reason why not to, please tell me. I don't want to waste my money on something I may not be able to use.

(edited by LeechOfTheNight on 4.2.02 1700)

(edited by CRZ on 4.2.02 1814)
ironcladlou
Potato korv
Level: 55

Posts: 167/701
EXP: 1307401
For next: 6797

Since: 2.1.02
From: Quincy, MA

Since last post: 2550 days
Last activity: 2402 days
#12 Posted on 4.2.02 2256.49
Reposted on: 4.2.09 2259.07
As far as I know, the only difference is that Professional has more features. Some of the features (I forget what they are) are actually useful, so just go with Professional. I think the rest is pretty inconsequential, except I recall hearing that the corporate edition of XP doesn't have the product registration bullshit.

BTW, I've been running ME for several months now and haven't had problem one. It actually fixed some lingering Win95 problems on my box, and it boots faster. I'm running a Pentium 233MHz HP Pavilion with 64Mb RAM and two 2gig HDDs.
xizor81
Tocino
Level: 19

Posts: 28/61
EXP: 33530
For next: 2247

Since: 11.1.02
From: Montreal, Quebec

Since last post: 4659 days
Last activity: 4064 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
#13 Posted on 5.2.02 0036.01
Reposted on: 5.2.09 0050.04
XP is really the way to go. I've been using it for a few months now and I'll never go back to a previous version! They made all kinds of little, useful tweaks to the UI, not to mention the rock solid NT core. XP is really the best OS that came out of Microsoft since DOS 5!

As for Home vs Pro, visit http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/whichxp.asp to check what version you need. Personally, I run Pro because the Home version doesn't have Remote Desktop. Good luck!
Qubber
Boerewors
Level: 42

Posts: 68/375
EXP: 511312
For next: 10054

Since: 7.1.02
From: Sheffield, UK

Since last post: 3036 days
Last activity: 2298 days
AIM:  
#14 Posted on 5.2.02 0431.38
Reposted on: 5.2.09 0445.29
Just adding another voice to say that XP rules. Does anyone know whether it's worth converting to NTFS? I upgraded from ME and stayed with FAT32, but it still seems rock solid, so I was wondering whether its worth converting or not....
LeechOfTheNight
Head cheese
Level: 39

Posts: 53/317
EXP: 397015
For next: 7760

Since: 16.1.02
From: New Hampshire

Since last post: 4465 days
Last activity: 3607 days
#15 Posted on 5.2.02 2003.50
Reposted on: 5.2.09 2011.15
OK, well, I understood the differences between Home and Professional, it was all that other stuff that was giving me headaches. Either way, I bought it last night and it should probably be in within the week. Thanks for your help.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: U2 at the Superbowl
Next thread: Super Bowl Ads
Previous thread: Frozen Pizza
(3872 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Random - WindowsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.47 seconds.