The W
Views: 99065930
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
20.9.07 0859
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Meltzer's Friday Update Register and log in to post!
(7329 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (15 total)
joecollins
Chorizo
Level: 28

Posts: 111/146
EXP: 120221
For next: 11119

Since: 2.1.02
From: Lititz, PA

Since last post: 3643 days
Last activity: 3643 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 15.11.02 1322.21
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1324.14
I just read Meltzer Friday update where he wrote, "Let's just say that Sunday won't be Shawn's last match." If that isn't a veiled reference to Michaels winning the World Title, I don't know what is.

The last time the WWF was stupid enough to put the title on him, he walked around saying he wouldn't lay down for anyone in the promotion, and even after he had a back that was fucked up six ways from Sunday, he was still saying he wouldn't put Austin over and had to be convined to do it by threats from the Undertaker (who promised him a "very long night").

If Michaels wins it's just another step backwards in a long series of them. Booker T or Chris Jericho is the answer, Michaels isn't.
Promote this thread!
Scar
Goetta
Level: 39

Posts: 224/313
EXP: 377342
For next: 27433

Since: 2.1.02
From: NS, Canada

Since last post: 1459 days
Last activity: 1116 days
#2 Posted on 15.11.02 1341.30
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1344.15

    Originally posted by joecollins
    I just read Meltzer Friday update where he wrote, "Let's just say that Sunday won't be Shawn's last match." If that isn't a veiled reference to Michaels winning the World Title, I don't know what is.

    The last time the WWF was stupid enough to put the title on him, he walked around saying he wouldn't lay down for anyone in the promotion, and even after he had a back that was fucked up six ways from Sunday, he was still saying he wouldn't put Austin over and had to be convined to do it by threats from the Undertaker (who promised him a "very long night").

    If Michaels wins it's just another step backwards in a long series of them. Booker T or Chris Jericho is the answer, Michaels isn't.



Shawn is probably the most over guy in the match and chances are he won't be around all that much longer. So give him the belt now while they can. Besides he found God.
commie_050
Cotechino
Level: 21

Posts: 13/81
EXP: 48496
For next: 1448

Since: 8.8.02
From: San Antonio, TX

Since last post: 3713 days
Last activity: 3712 days
#3 Posted on 15.11.02 1344.02
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1347.53
You know, I'm not a fan of politics, but if HBK just happened to have a relapse into his back problems, and he just happened to not be able to job to HHH at the December PPV, I wouldn't hold it against him.
fuelinjected
Banger
Level: 97

Posts: 101/2679
EXP: 9157370
For next: 159988

Since: 12.10.02
From: Canada

Since last post: 3229 days
Last activity: 3229 days
#4 Posted on 15.11.02 1346.24
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1348.14
Why would they put the title on a guy who can't work a regular TV schedule let alone a house show schedule?

I'd love to see Shawn double cross Hunter and not job the title to him. How fitting would that be?
asteroidboy
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 549/2241
EXP: 7213708
For next: 255233

Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 1396 days
Last activity: 304 days
#5 Posted on 15.11.02 1351.14
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1352.34
Did Shawn really say that he wasn't gonna put Austin over? And Mark Calloway convinced him to do it? Probably by holding himself up as an example of unselfishness, no doubt.
SKLOKAZOID
Bratwurst
Level: 74

Posts: 184/1428
EXP: 3646716
For next: 6845

Since: 20.3.02
From: California

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 12 hours
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 15.11.02 1410.24
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1410.55
    Originally posted by asteroidboy
    Did Shawn really say that he wasn't gonna put Austin over? And Mark Calloway convinced him to do it? Probably by holding himself up as an example of unselfishness, no doubt.


This was the rumor at the time, although it's hard take it seriously when looking at what was going on around WM14.

HBK was pretty much done by that point. If anything, he probably wanted to just not have the match, but he used that excuse last year so he wanted to actually perform this time and go out with a bang.

Steve Austin was plowing through everyone in the WWF at the time and there was no doubt that he was "The Man." Even Shawn Michaels had to realize that.

So, with Shawn Michaels having one last match against the biggest star in the WWF at a high-profile event featuring Mike Tyson, it was kind of hard to not want to lose. It was the only way for him to go out, really, and gain the respect and admiration of everyone he ever worked with. Except Bret.

Taking all of that into consideration, it's hard for me to buy that Michaels didn't know that WM14 would be his last match as a regular performer and I don't think there was any way, logically, for Shawn to win that one except to out-perform his opponent yet still lose the match. I think that job solidified his status as a well-respected face going into his Commissionership and subsequent return this year.

Of course, Michaels pissed that all away by coming back this year. He did prove that he can still work a great match, but I really wish he just closed his legacy on a high note. I guess his family (and God) really needed the money.

(edited by SKLOKAZOID on 15.11.02 1210)
Simba
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 118/809
EXP: 1531001
For next: 46554

Since: 7.8.02
From: Boston, MA

Since last post: 2471 days
Last activity: 2079 days
#7 Posted on 15.11.02 1416.11
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1416.19
Ah speculation, I love it! Everyone assumes Shawn can't work a "regular schedule". What exactly defines a regular schedule? House shows? Rocky hardly ever worked house shows on his last run this summer. Anyone know how many TV tapings he actually wrestled on?
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 64

Posts: 456/1008
EXP: 2139201
For next: 74908

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 3872 days
Last activity: 3841 days
#8 Posted on 15.11.02 1437.30
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1437.46
If Shawn gets it and puts on matches like he used to and like he did this year, what's the problem (if he can of course)?
Lotty
Chourico
Level: 36

Posts: 161/268
EXP: 296387
For next: 11726

Since: 23.3.02
From: Bay Area

Since last post: 3332 days
Last activity: 2606 days
#9 Posted on 15.11.02 1439.26
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1441.04
Hell, they put the title back on Hogan.

Steiner can fued with HBK and destroy him at the next PPV.

Then Hunter will beat Steiner a few months later, and then beat Brock at Wrestlemania!

(edited by Lotty on 15.11.02 1440)

(edited by Lotty on 15.11.02 1440)
Ringmistress
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 501/1597
EXP: 4342874
For next: 39371

Since: 15.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 2642 days
Last activity: 2641 days
#10 Posted on 15.11.02 1505.20
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1505.21
C'mooooon Booker....

Ringmistress
joecollins
Chorizo
Level: 28

Posts: 114/146
EXP: 120221
For next: 11119

Since: 2.1.02
From: Lititz, PA

Since last post: 3643 days
Last activity: 3643 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 15.11.02 1618.22
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1618.42
The story goes that Michaels was looking for a way out of "doing the honors" at WMXIV. It wasn't that Undertaker talked him into doing because he was such a great example (although I'd argue he was in 1998), but that he insisted Michaels would be in for a long night if he didn't. I'm assuming the meaning there is that Austin would give Michaels several stiff shots to the back during the match and generally make his life miserable the entire time they were out there.

I do believe this story (Michaels giving static about doing the J-O-B and Undertaker telling him he'd be in for a long night if he didn't) was CONFIRMED on Meltzer's show a few years back, I think by Jim Cornette who would have been backstage (but who, also, has lost no love for Micahels and the rest of the Clique).

As far as it being plausible, I can totally see Michaels not wanting to do the job and bitching about it even though he knew he was finished, but I would also think that if he did, he would know that such bitching on his part was going to be an empty, futile effort at best. EVERYONE knew that Austin was getting the World title on that night.


    Originally posted by Scott Summets
    If Shawn gets it and puts on matches like he used to and like he did this year, what's the problem (if he can of course)?


He put on ONE MATCH, a garbagy match at that. I just watched it a few nights ago and would also argue that he was carried by HHH. It was not Michaels from 1996 or even 1998 for that matter. It was a guy with a bad back who's limitations were being masked by the garbage brawling.

Further, if HHH would bump for RVD, Kane and Booker the way he did in that match, I'd have no problem with him holding the world title. But he ONLY CHOOSES TO SELL FOR HIS FRIENDS, which is why his last two matches have been crap.

(edited by joecollins on 15.11.02 1730)
DarrylTheHitman
Potato korv
Level: 54

Posts: 489/676
EXP: 1163509
For next: 70368

Since: 21.9.02
From: Kitimat, British Columbia, Canada

Since last post: 3247 days
Last activity: 2865 days
#12 Posted on 16.11.02 1542.33
Reposted on: 16.11.09 1543.34
Maybe there'll be a double screwjob on HBK and HHH? Probably not but as a Bret Hart fan, I'd certainly enjoy it.
fuelinjected
Banger
Level: 97

Posts: 108/2679
EXP: 9157370
For next: 159988

Since: 12.10.02
From: Canada

Since last post: 3229 days
Last activity: 3229 days
#13 Posted on 16.11.02 1545.28
Reposted on: 16.11.09 1545.47
Undertaker confirmed the story on Off The Record (TSN) before WrestleMania. He was waiting behind the curtain for Michaels if he did anything wrong.

HBK 2002
Linguica
Level: 20

Posts: 70/73
EXP: 42292
For next: 147

Since: 17.2.02

Since last post: 4295 days
Last activity: 4289 days
#14 Posted on 16.11.02 2351.40
Reposted on: 16.11.09 2352.44
Who knows, though, how serious Michaels was? A lot of people need a little extra hand-holding before 1) getting married; 2) a major business deal; or 3) doing the job in the biggest match in your career.

All that really matters is that HBK did the job. He did the job in the biggest, most high profile match of his entire career. And that job helped propel Austin to superstardom. How many legends of wrestling can say that they did the job in the biggest match of their careers? Andre. HBK. And the list pretty much stops there....

HBK passed the Torch. He wrestled a pretty damn good match when he shouldn't have wrestled at all.
The King of Keith
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 87/1572
EXP: 4104869
For next: 86279

Since: 4.11.02
From: Winchester, VA

Since last post: 281 days
Last activity: 240 days
AIM:  
#15 Posted on 17.11.02 0319.51
Reposted on: 17.11.09 0320.51
Where is the love for HBK? Apparently not here. Look, the guy was/is THE MAN. Nobody could work matches in their prime like HBK. His backstage rep is always brought up as a detraction, but unless it interfered in his matches, I'd say who cares? There was only 2 times I remember him throwing tantrums in public (at Summerslam v. Vader and at IYH: Beware of Dog), but as long as he kept those great matches a-coming, all was forgiven.

HBK does what he does for all of us. Remember Summerslam? Remember "I love each and every one of you"? I do. That moment made the match for me.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: The Blind Date Chronicles
Next thread: Brock vs. Big Show: Who wins in a shoot?
Previous thread: Can WWE give Big Slug the title and STILL make it a good move? YES!
(7329 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Meltzer's Friday UpdateRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.329 seconds.