The W
Views: 116532915
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.9.09 1040
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Royal Rumble 2003 idea
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(8314 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (14 total)
Mystic Gohan 2003
Chipolata
Level: 25

Posts: 8/116
EXP: 89166
For next: 455

Since: 18.10.02
From: Tulsa Oklahoma

Since last post: 886 days
Last activity: 846 days
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 13.11.02 2348.22
Reposted on: 13.11.09 2348.24
Hey ok, if this idea has been thrown up before, then shoot me or something. Anyways, why not get rid of Brand Extension by having Royal Rumble as a start. Have Smackdown and Raw both in the match, and the winner faces the World and WWE Champion at WrestleMania in a triple threat match. The winner, is new undisputed champion, eliminating brand extension, or going back to Undisputed Champion wrestles on both shows, ok I'll shut up now...
Promote this thread!
ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 137

Posts: 1324/5525
EXP: 30103707
For next: 769226

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 21 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
#2 Posted on 13.11.02 2356.40
Reposted on: 13.11.09 2357.58
Actually, I had a similar thought, but not an exactly identical one. The Royal Rumble would feature 15 RAW and 15 SmackDown Superstars. The winner would get a shot at either the WCW World Title (if a RAW Superstar wins it) or the WWE World Title (if a SmackDown Superstar wins it). That way, the Royal Rumble would be important in establishing which title theoretically has more value.

I'm still liking the two champions, two promotions thing for the time being.
tomvejada
Andouille
Level: 93

Posts: 1076/2247
EXP: 7814844
For next: 237996

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 4780 days
Last activity: 4780 days
#3 Posted on 14.11.02 0642.57
Reposted on: 14.11.09 0643.05
That sounds good.

I wonder what would happen if Stone Cold Steve Austin wins since he announced that he will participate in the Royal Rumble.
Captain Ferret
Polska kielbasa
Level: 26

Posts: 14/125
EXP: 100075
For next: 2202

Since: 14.9.02
From: Manchester

Since last post: 93 days
Last activity: 11 days
#4 Posted on 14.11.02 0656.17
Reposted on: 14.11.09 0657.01
He'd face the champion from raw wouldn't he?
cfgb
Bierwurst
Level: 87

Posts: 657/1918
EXP: 6162934
For next: 229865

Since: 2.1.02
From: Ottawa, Ontario

Since last post: 1 hour
Last activity: 20 min.
#5 Posted on 14.11.02 1025.01
Reposted on: 14.11.09 1026.05
I wonder what would happen if Stone Cold Steve Austin wins since he announced that he will participate in the Royal Rumble.

I'd throw up, considering it'd be his fourth official rumble victory - though technically his 5th, since 1999 was overturned as soon as Vince gave up his spot in the Mania main event.

Time for a new winner!
asteroidboy
Andouille
Level: 93

Posts: 540/2241
EXP: 7768875
For next: 283965

Since: 22.1.02
From: Texas

Since last post: 2135 days
Last activity: 1043 days
#6 Posted on 14.11.02 1047.29
Reposted on: 14.11.09 1052.29
It's waaaaay to early, but I think it'd be a hoot if Matt Hardy (v1) won it. Just imagine how much that would get people talking. And he would never, ever shut up about it.
FurryHippie
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 61/788
EXP: 1577075
For next: 480

Since: 29.10.02
From: New York

Since last post: 3686 days
Last activity: 2373 days
AIM:  
#7 Posted on 14.11.02 1115.22
Reposted on: 14.11.09 1117.59
For some reason, maybe because I'm too old school for my own damn good, I cringe at the thought of anything but a 1 on 1 match in the main event for the WWF Title....I like triple threats/4 ways/etc., but not for the main event at WrestleMania.

Also, just because Austin entered himself in the Rumble almost 10 months ago, doesn't mean he's gonna be in it. That quote was obviously made with the thought he was gonna be, ya know, IN THE COMPANY for the 2003 Rumble. Unless talks get started again and old wounds are healed, we ain't gonna see Austin in the Rumble.
LeechOfTheNight
Head cheese
Level: 40

Posts: 205/317
EXP: 413539
For next: 27774

Since: 16.1.02
From: New Hampshire

Since last post: 4885 days
Last activity: 4027 days
#8 Posted on 14.11.02 1744.12
Reposted on: 14.11.09 1744.12

    Originally posted by FurryHippie
    Also, just because Austin entered himself in the Rumble almost 10 months ago, doesn't mean he's gonna be in it. That quote was obviously made with the thought he was gonna be, ya know, IN THE COMPANY for the 2003 Rumble. Unless talks get started again and old wounds are healed, we ain't gonna see Austin in the Rumble.


Uh, I don't think anyone seriously believes that just because Austin said he was gonna be in the Rumble next year, that he'll definately be in it. Of course, I wouldn't rule it out. Hell, it would be really cool if the night after the Rumble he came out and said he told us 12 months ago he'd be in it. Now taht'd be consistency for ya!

I agree w/ Mystic, the Rumble should be a catalyst for the end of Brand Extension. Only, I'd do it differently. Recombine the titles at the Rumble and have the the Undisputed champion face the Rumble winner. If they don't do this, the Rumble is gonna lose some its appeal. Any other way of doing it would be kinda stupid. Even if Brand Extension doesn't end, then at least we'd be back to having one champion on two shows. I liked that a lot better than the crap they've been doing now (although, I don't think I'd personally be able to take having to see Brock Lesnar twice a week, once is more than enough for me).
rockdotcom_2.0
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 299/763
EXP: 1545335
For next: 32220

Since: 9.1.02
From: Virginia Beach Va

Since last post: 1287 days
Last activity: 217 days
AIM:  
#9 Posted on 14.11.02 1858.17
Reposted on: 14.11.09 1859.01
I just dont understand why everyone is such in a hurry to kill the brand extension. Why is that we scream and scream for the WWE to do something diffrent, to make a change to better the product, then when they do and actually stick with it we scream to go back to the old way? Do you really want to have deal with HHH on both shows? Dont you like Rey Mysterio? And Edge as a main eventer? And Benoit as a main eventer? These things dont happen without the split into two shows. Embrace change people... Smackdown right now is a great show. Why change that? Eventually Raw will get its act together. And then well have two great shows, with seperate storylines and great wrestlers.
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 112

Posts: 763/3504
EXP: 15215921
For next: 122332

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 1011 days
Last activity: 698 days
#10 Posted on 14.11.02 2040.24
Reposted on: 14.11.09 2040.52

    Originally posted by rockdotcom_2.0
    I just dont understand why everyone is such in a hurry to kill the brand extension. Why is that we scream and scream for the WWE to do something diffrent, to make a change to better the product, then when they do and actually stick with it we scream to go back to the old way? Do you really want to have deal with HHH on both shows? Dont you like Rey Mysterio? And Edge as a main eventer? And Benoit as a main eventer? These things dont happen without the split into two shows. Embrace change people... Smackdown right now is a great show. Why change that? Eventually Raw will get its act together. And then well have two great shows, with seperate storylines and great wrestlers.


The idea is Benoit, Edge, Mysterio, etc ON BOTH SHOWS, then they can afford to shitcan HHH and bring back Austin.
Mattitude
Chorizo
Level: 28

Posts: 25/150
EXP: 131256
For next: 84

Since: 7.10.02
From: the last house on the left

Since last post: 16 days
Last activity: 5 days
#11 Posted on 15.11.02 0012.17
Reposted on: 15.11.09 0059.31
I've got an idea for the Rumble...

Okay, there's be 15 Raw guys and 15 Smackdown guys. The last guy from each show in the ring gets a shot at his show's title, with the final winner getting to be in the main event of Wrestlemania.

For example, let's say Kane and Kurt Angle are the last two guys in the ring, and Angle eliminates Kane. Kane would get a shot at the Raw title and Angle would get a shot at the Smackdown title, but Angle would be in the main event at Wrestlemania.
ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 137

Posts: 1334/5525
EXP: 30103707
For next: 769226

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 21 hours
Last activity: 2 hours
#12 Posted on 15.11.02 0115.05
Reposted on: 15.11.09 0122.23
Freeway,

While I wouldn't mind seeing Benoit, Mysterio and Angle (not Edge) on both shows, Triple H would be on both shows as well... making each of them his bitch.

Brand extension? Keep it!
BX
Cotto
Level: 16

Posts: 32/39
EXP: 17371
For next: 2886

Since: 25.10.02
From: Pinebluff, NC

Since last post: 4997 days
Last activity: 4964 days
AIM:  
#13 Posted on 15.11.02 0144.45
Reposted on: 15.11.09 0145.29
I have an idea. I will be hated though.

Like has been said, 15 RAW guys, 15 Smackdown guys (or alternately, a couple of debuting wildcarders). The last person from each Roster wins.

At Wrestlemania, the main event would be a 4 way Iron Man Match. You'd have 4 men, 2 from each show. After the hour ends, whoever has the most pins/submissions from each show wins their respective title.

Come on, who can resist a 4 way Iron man match?

Say, we have Angle and Brock from Smackdown, and Jericho and HHH from RAW.

Everytime Jericho pinned someone, he would get a point. RAW, Smackdown, it doesnt matter. If he were pinned by a Smackdown guy, the Smackdown guy would gain a pinfall, however, Jericho wouldn't lose a point, because a Smackdown guy beating him is irrelevant. if HHH pins Jericho, Jericho loses a "point". At the end of the match, Angle has more points then Brock, and Jericho has more points then HHH. Two new champs..

(edited by BX on 14.11.02 2348)
commie_050
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 15/81
EXP: 52389
For next: 5962

Since: 8.8.02
From: San Antonio, TX

Since last post: 4452 days
Last activity: 4451 days
#14 Posted on 15.11.02 1401.04
Reposted on: 15.11.09 1403.02
Props to bringing up Austin entering himself in the 2003 Royal Rumble. If the Rattlesnake shows up stating he is simply fulfilling his commitement, I will award him undying devotion and eternal divine status, wife-beating be damned.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Tough Enough 11/14
Next thread: Can any amount of new big name stars turn things around?
Previous thread: your WWE SMACKDOWN WORKRATE REPORT- 11/14/2002!
(8314 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Royal Rumble 2003 ideaRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.62 seconds.