The W
Views: 95717063
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.4.07 1000
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - I have a dare for you... Register and log in to post!
(1931 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (16 total)
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 102

Posts: 696/3018
EXP: 10967742
For next: 122263

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 14 days
Last activity: 20 hours
AIM:  
#1 Posted on 9.11.02 1303.42
Reposted on: 9.11.09 1303.44
...And this directed moreso to our conservatives, although it applys to everyone. Go see "Bowling For Columbine". I'd love to discuss this film with you, but I have no interest in discuss your pre-concieved notions about the movie.

First of all, let me stress to you that this is *not* a movie about gun control, and would probably add a lot more fuel to your fire stating that gun control wouldn't solve anything. The movie attempts to determine *why* there is so much gun violence in the United States, when the rest of the world has just as many guns as we do, but drastically lower gun homicide rates.

If any of you take me up on this, I thank you in advance.

And, for those of you who *aren't* the conservatives among us, you have no excuse for not seeing this movie. It's easily Moore's best work since "Roger and Me".
Promote this thread!
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 398/1759
EXP: 4826744
For next: 166126

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1130 days
Last activity: 11 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 9.11.02 1537.05
Reposted on: 9.11.09 1537.25
Ask me again when it is on video... I already decided to wait to see that one. There is too much else coming out that I want to see....
cranlsn
Liverwurst
Level: 69

Posts: 172/1204
EXP: 2776643
For next: 93115

Since: 18.3.02
From: Sussex, WI

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 8 min.
#3 Posted on 9.11.02 1752.14
Reposted on: 9.11.09 1758.34

    Originally posted by Pool-Boy
    Ask me again when it is on video... I already decided to wait to see that one. There is too much else coming out that I want to see....


Actually, I'm with you on this one. I've an open enough mind to catch it on video...but...

On the other hand I despise Roger Moore enough that I don't want to spend $8 to see it in the theaters. So unless it's a "special effects extravaganza" that I absolutely need to see on the big screen...I'll be waiting for VHS.

I have a feeling that I'll want to discuss it, and in all fairness I'll need to watch it to do that properly.

StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 138

Posts: 203/6114
EXP: 31047505
For next: 615555

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 9.11.02 1833.18
Reposted on: 9.11.09 1834.25
See, its people like YOU that made them hire two new James Bonds in the past 20 years!
Nothing is wrong with Roger Moore!
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 102

Posts: 698/3018
EXP: 10967742
For next: 122263

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 14 days
Last activity: 20 hours
AIM:  
#5 Posted on 9.11.02 2032.36
Reposted on: 9.11.09 2032.46

    Originally posted by Pool-Boy
    Ask me again when it is on video... I already decided to wait to see that one. There is too much else coming out that I want to see....


Fair enough.
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator
Level: 129

Posts: 1168/5148
EXP: 24755198
For next: 294523

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 14 hours
Last activity: 4 hours
#6 Posted on 10.11.02 0908.49
Reposted on: 10.11.09 0909.05

    Originally posted by cranlsn

      Originally posted by Pool-Boy
      Ask me again when it is on video... I already decided to wait to see that one. There is too much else coming out that I want to see....


    Actually, I'm with you on this one. I've an open enough mind to catch it on video...but...

    On the other hand I despise Roger Moore enough that I don't want to spend $8 to see it in the theaters. So unless it's a "special effects extravaganza" that I absolutely need to see on the big screen...I'll be waiting for VHS.

    I have a feeling that I'll want to discuss it, and in all fairness I'll need to watch it to do that properly.




Roger Moore???

you mean MICHAEL Moore...

Roger Moore was James Bond...
cranlsn
Liverwurst
Level: 69

Posts: 173/1204
EXP: 2776643
For next: 93115

Since: 18.3.02
From: Sussex, WI

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 8 min.
#7 Posted on 10.11.02 1508.12
Reposted on: 10.11.09 1510.50
I know...I know...it was already caught before I came back to re-read this thread...

Not enough sleep + not enough caffeine = mixing up my Moore's.
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 399/1759
EXP: 4826744
For next: 166126

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1130 days
Last activity: 11 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#8 Posted on 11.11.02 0208.56
Reposted on: 11.11.09 0218.17
No big whoop- Roger Moore was ass as James Bond anyway...
Give me GEORGE LAZENBY!!!
anibanging
Italian
Level: 35

Posts: 57/246
EXP: 256803
For next: 23135

Since: 5.3.02

Since last post: 1832 days
Last activity: 1196 days
#9 Posted on 11.11.02 1543.49
Reposted on: 11.11.09 1551.00
Here are my most immediate thoughts on the film:

1) The gun-related death numbers Moore quotes are somewhat misleading. The US is still pretty far ahead of the pack but not to as big an extent as it seemed. Canada for example was said to have something like 250 gun related deaths a year. But if you factor in the population difference that would be 2500. I don't remeber the exact numbers for other countries listed, but - aside from Japan which would still have less than 100 gun related deaths a year - the gun deaths:population ratio is not as severe a difference as it was made to be.

2) I don't get why Chuck Heston reacted so badly. Moore was pretty much backing up the NRAs claims that guns don't kill people, people do. But he missed his opportunity and came off looking bad. I also am not sure whether this was done before he was diagnosed with Alzheimer's or not, but given the way Moore dominated it was a little uncomfortable to watch.

3) The only reference to other countries having as many guns as Americans was Canada and this is not a good compatison. Of the 7 mil guns in 10 mil homes (according to whatever facts Moore used) they are predominatly hunting rifles and what not. Handguns are not common. Neither are assault rifles. Not to mention the much more stringent regulations and teh gun registy. So the notion that other countries know how to not kill people with guns fell pretty flat for me.

Putting that aside, it was an excellent film.
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 414/1759
EXP: 4826744
For next: 166126

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1130 days
Last activity: 11 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#10 Posted on 11.11.02 1614.32
Reposted on: 11.11.09 1629.08
I, of course, have not seen the film, but does it address the percentage of violent crimes committed with registered handguns and rifles vs. black-market weapons? Last I checked, the vast majority of crimes involving guns involved guns purchased "outside" the system...
anibanging
Italian
Level: 35

Posts: 59/246
EXP: 256803
For next: 23135

Since: 5.3.02

Since last post: 1832 days
Last activity: 1196 days
#11 Posted on 11.11.02 1720.00
Reposted on: 11.11.09 1720.25

    Originally posted by Pool-Boy
    I, of course, have not seen the film, but does it address the percentage of violent crimes committed with registered handguns and rifles vs. black-market weapons? Last I checked, the vast majority of crimes involving guns involved guns purchased "outside" the system...


It doesn't give actual figures, although it does point out that some noteworthy gun violence (i.e columbine and a first grader shooting another first grader) was commited with legal guns.

It also incinuates, and briefly tells the story of a guy who got a hold of legal guns then sold them to Detroit gangs, that merely having such an abundance of guns in the country legally makes it easier for the criminals to get a hold of them through theft or illegal sales.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 102

Posts: 708/3018
EXP: 10967742
For next: 122263

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 14 days
Last activity: 20 hours
AIM:  
#12 Posted on 11.11.02 1818.45
Reposted on: 11.11.09 1818.45

    Originally posted by anibanging
    Here are my most immediate thoughts on the film:

    1) The gun-related death numbers Moore quotes are somewhat misleading. The US is still pretty far ahead of the pack but not to as big an extent as it seemed. Canada for example was said to have something like 250 gun related deaths a year. But if you factor in the population difference that would be 2500. I don't remeber the exact numbers for other countries listed, but - aside from Japan which would still have less than 100 gun related deaths a year - the gun deaths:population ratio is not as severe a difference as it was made to be.

    2) I don't get why Chuck Heston reacted so badly. Moore was pretty much backing up the NRAs claims that guns don't kill people, people do. But he missed his opportunity and came off looking bad. I also am not sure whether this was done before he was diagnosed with Alzheimer's or not, but given the way Moore dominated it was a little uncomfortable to watch.

    3) The only reference to other countries having as many guns as Americans was Canada and this is not a good compatison. Of the 7 mil guns in 10 mil homes (according to whatever facts Moore used) they are predominatly hunting rifles and what not. Handguns are not common. Neither are assault rifles. Not to mention the much more stringent regulations and teh gun registy. So the notion that other countries know how to not kill people with guns fell pretty flat for me.

    Putting that aside, it was an excellent film.



Heston obviously had Altzheimer's at the time of the shooting (no pun intended), but no one was aware yet. This film's been finished for close to a year, seeking a distributor.
Leroy
Andouille
Level: 90

Posts: 72/2216
EXP: 6963443
For next: 225193

Since: 7.2.02
From: Huntington, NY

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#13 Posted on 11.11.02 1930.30
Reposted on: 11.11.09 1930.31
I think some of you are missing the point. The film was not really about gun control. It was about the "culture of fear" with in the United States. The NRA and Heston were focal points not because the are gun advocates, but because they are fanatical gun advocates, even beyond the sense of good taste (like having a NRA rally days after a school shooting - in the same town).

Guns are merely a way of addressing the issue. Moore, in my view, did not come across very anti-gun at all during the film.
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 64

Posts: 444/1008
EXP: 2102509
For next: 111600

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 3720 days
Last activity: 3689 days
#14 Posted on 12.11.02 0723.42
Reposted on: 12.11.09 0726.24

    Originally posted by Leroy
    I think some of you are missing the point. The film was not really about gun control. It was about the "culture of fear" with in the United States. The NRA and Heston were focal points not because the are gun advocates, but because they are fanatical gun advocates, even beyond the sense of good taste (like having a NRA rally days after a school shooting - in the same town).

    Guns are merely a way of addressing the issue. Moore, in my view, did not come across very anti-gun at all during the film.



Isn't Moore in the NRA?
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 115

Posts: 706/3934
EXP: 16333375
For next: 478040

Since: 22.4.02
From: Connecticut

Since last post: 24 days
Last activity: 3 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#15 Posted on 13.11.02 0017.05
Reposted on: 13.11.09 0018.31

    Originally posted by Scott Summets

      Originally posted by Leroy
      I think some of you are missing the point. The film was not really about gun control. It was about the "culture of fear" with in the United States. The NRA and Heston were focal points not because the are gun advocates, but because they are fanatical gun advocates, even beyond the sense of good taste (like having a NRA rally days after a school shooting - in the same town).

      Guns are merely a way of addressing the issue. Moore, in my view, did not come across very anti-gun at all during the film.



    Isn't Moore in the NRA?



Lifetime member, no less.
StaggerLee
Scrapple
Level: 138

Posts: 232/6114
EXP: 31047505
For next: 615555

Since: 3.10.02
From: Right side of the tracks

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#16 Posted on 13.11.02 0024.01
Reposted on: 13.11.09 0026.05
I want to see this film, but, got no spare cash. I know Moore is very intellegent, so it should come off well.

As far as the columbine shooting, and the other first grader shooting, I am sure that the people that did the shooting themselves, were not the registered owners of those weapons.

I am all for people being able to own as many guns as they want, but, with that comes an enormous responsibility that they are used correctly, and not for criminal purposes.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: We are going into Iraq for OIL!
Next thread: Our Tax Dollars are paying for this crap.....
Previous thread: For Fuzzy
(1931 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - I have a dare for you...Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.196 seconds.