The W
Views: 110240672
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
13.2.09 1130
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Wellstone Memorial Decried as Political Rally Register and log in to post!
(2163 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (10 total)
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 126

Posts: 531/4700
EXP: 22704570
For next: 379597

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1747 days
Last activity: 202 days
#1 Posted on 30.10.02 0750.49
Reposted on: 30.10.09 0751.04
Click Here

I think that the Democrats really dropped the ball on this way. The DFL blew a chance to seal the deal and instead wound up with something that was indeed more rally than memorial.
Promote this thread!
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 709/2164
EXP: 7224661
For next: 244280

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 18 days
Last activity: 2 days
#2 Posted on 30.10.02 0905.50
Reposted on: 30.10.09 0906.15
This will be an interesting excercise in who times it right. The Dems overplayed this and it backfired on them, but now the GOP risks overplaying the backlash, and having it backfire on them. It's now all a game of who's got the public sympathy on election day.
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 82

Posts: 266/1759
EXP: 5187137
For next: 22112

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1793 days
Last activity: 560 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#3 Posted on 30.10.02 1200.51
Reposted on: 30.10.09 1201.01
I still have not heard much GOP backlash on this (I have been a bit out of the loop in the last day, admittedly), but I did just hear parts of the memorial service... and talk about utterly disgusting.
Who's idea was that? I mean, after all that talk about "Wellstone not being in the ground yet" by the Democrats... to pull something like that was very wrong...
How are the GOP responding to this?
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 117

Posts: 643/3973
EXP: 17786999
For next: 60949

Since: 22.4.02
From: Outside of Boston

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 30.10.02 1319.22
Reposted on: 30.10.09 1325.01
Besides, all that crap about the best way to pay tribute to him being electing a Democrat to his seat? That's not gonna help at all. Try electing an actual liberal.
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 82

Posts: 273/1759
EXP: 5187137
For next: 22112

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1793 days
Last activity: 560 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#5 Posted on 30.10.02 1330.56
Reposted on: 30.10.09 1332.10
HELP WHAT? Why should there be a call to elect a Democrat to serve "his memory?"
I feel SORRY for Wellstone. There was no remorse at his memorial... the only thing Wellstone is good for now to the Democratic Party is a campaign point. It is pretty sad... How about talking about his accomplishments? His family? Instead, it was all about "Paul would have wanted us to WIN!" Like Wellstones entire life was one huge push for a Democratic victory in one campaign. Sad...
Ubermonkeys
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 411/784
EXP: 1576158
For next: 1397

Since: 2.1.02
From: Michigan

Since last post: 3996 days
Last activity: 3870 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 30.10.02 1509.53
Reposted on: 30.10.09 1513.56
Contains a polite expression of grief over Wellstone's death and zero pointless, ill-produced cartoons.

I guess being a Democrat for me just isn't what it used to be. I don't really care for their hemp or being anti-death penalty, but it's shit like this that makes me feel alright about being with the hippies.
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 714/2164
EXP: 7224661
For next: 244280

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 18 days
Last activity: 2 days
#7 Posted on 30.10.02 1630.42
Reposted on: 30.10.09 1631.00
Um, if Senator Wellstone was such the hero to Greens that this press release suggests, why the hell did they run someone against him?

See, this is the shit that makes me hate the Green party. I can understand running against a centrist candidate (say, Al Gore) in a tight race, risking throwing the election to the Republican to make a point or "advance democracy" or whatever. But running someone against the most liberal member of the Senate in a razon-thin race? That alone has cost the Greens my vote for anything for at least the next couple of election cycles (get back to me once Zell Miller is considered a "Liberal." Should be about 6 years, the way thing are going now).



Net Hack Slasher
Banger
Level: 101

Posts: 606/2805
EXP: 10661937
For next: 55775

Since: 6.1.02
From: Outer reaches of your mind

Since last post: 4067 days
Last activity: 2487 days
#8 Posted on 31.10.02 2130.37
Reposted on: 31.10.09 2131.17
It truly is pathetic that during a memorial service they can't leave their political beliefs at the door. But then again most people in politics has such a messed up perception on life itself it's not surprising.

Jessy Ventura walked out in the middle of it. Jessy rules. Too bad he's not running for re-election. But I guess he saw that politics has less credibility then wrestling.

vsp
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 643/2042
EXP: 6624538
For next: 26152

Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 3511 days
Last activity: 725 days
#9 Posted on 31.10.02 2228.20
Reposted on: 31.10.09 2229.02

    Originally posted by MoeGates
    Um, if Senator Wellstone was such the hero to Greens that this press release suggests, why the hell did they run someone against him?

    See, this is the shit that makes me hate the Green party. I can understand running against a centrist candidate (say, Al Gore) in a tight race, risking throwing the election to the Republican to make a point or "advance democracy" or whatever. But running someone against the most liberal member of the Senate in a razon-thin race? That alone has cost the Greens my vote for anything for at least the next couple of election cycles (get back to me once Zell Miller is considered a "Liberal." Should be about 6 years, the way thing are going now).



Well, when the Minnesota Green Party announced their intention to run someone against Wellstone, Nader's running mate (Winona LaDuke) said WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING? and led an unsuccessful effort to stop it in its tracks. Then Nader himself endorsed Wellstone and (justifiably) backhanded the Minnesota Greens for nominating McGaa in the first place.

The Minnesota contingent had their reasons, I suppose, but they certainly didn't speak for the party on a national level, and they took a LOT of flak from damn near everyone on the left for their actions.
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 65

Posts: 425/1008
EXP: 2258250
For next: 77390

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 4383 days
Last activity: 4352 days
#10 Posted on 1.11.02 0724.49
Reposted on: 1.11.09 0725.52

    Originally posted by MoeGates
    Um, if Senator Wellstone was such the hero to Greens that this press release suggests, why the hell did they run someone against him?

    See, this is the shit that makes me hate the Green party. I can understand running against a centrist candidate (say, Al Gore) in a tight race, risking throwing the election to the Republican to make a point or "advance democracy" or whatever. But running someone against the most liberal member of the Senate in a razon-thin race? That alone has cost the Greens my vote for anything for at least the next couple of election cycles (get back to me once Zell Miller is considered a "Liberal." Should be about 6 years, the way thing are going now).






Heh, funny you should mention Zell Miller, in Georgia, everyone loves him, Democrats and Republicans.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: That's our Jesse
Next thread: Massachusetts Governor's race
Previous thread: A Nightmare in the Senate
(2163 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Wellstone Memorial Decried as Political RallyRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.571 seconds.