The W
Views: 98459441
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
27.8.07 0422
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Susan Sarandon is stupid
This thread has 17 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 3 Next(1981 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (49 total)
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 64

Posts: 403/1008
EXP: 2133402
For next: 80707

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 3848 days
Last activity: 3817 days
#1 Posted on 27.10.02 0603.19
Reposted on: 27.10.09 0606.44
Did anyone see her little speech yesterday, jeez is this woman an idiot. Not one of her comments made any sense at all or were valid. Whoever thought of putting her up there is a dumbass, and whoever agreed with her is one too. That had to have been the worst speech I've ever heard in my entire life.
Promote this thread!
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 697/2104
EXP: 6556465
For next: 94225

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 7 days
#2 Posted on 27.10.02 0955.48
Reposted on: 27.10.09 0958.10
I myself can't stand celebrity junior politicians. I;ve got to say though, that includes Charlton Heston, Arnold Swartzenagger, and Tom Sellek as well as Rosie O'Donnell, Susan Sarandon, and Alec Baldwin.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 103

Posts: 614/3024
EXP: 11159900
For next: 311545

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 5 hours
AIM:  
#3 Posted on 27.10.02 1017.04
Reposted on: 27.10.09 1018.48
I include Reagan in that, too.

Okay, so I wasn't the only one who saw the anti-war demonstration on C-SPAN yesterday with the vastly huge crowd gathered in support. Did anyone happen to catch the pro-war rally later in the evening with, I'm estimating, about 75 people chanting "Saddam and Hitler are the same"?

To me, that kinda shows where the American mindset is on this, but I'm sure I'm horribly wrong and hate America.
PalpatineW
Lap cheong
Level: 77

Posts: 363/1528
EXP: 4059561
For next: 131587

Since: 2.1.02
From: Getting Rowdy

Since last post: 2773 days
Last activity: 2615 days
AIM:  
#4 Posted on 27.10.02 1122.00
Reposted on: 27.10.09 1122.32
Fuzzy, when you make a point about the validity of the "American mindset," you should probably introduce facts and principles not related to the popularity of said mindset with the "international communuity." If France and Sweden say something is bad, does that mean that I should think it's bad? Your posts lead me to believe that, yes, this is your position.

Also, Charlton Heston is my President.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 1100/3273
EXP: 12697727
For next: 393626

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 141 days
Last activity: 141 days
#5 Posted on 27.10.02 1222.05
Reposted on: 27.10.09 1229.01
Palp: That only makes sense if the protest OFB was watching was one being held in France or Sweden. I assumed from his post that it was an American protest, but maybe I assumed wrong and OFB is silly.

OFB: Don't make assumptions based on protest. I'm sure there are plenty of people who are for the war, but don't feel the need to go tell everyone about it. That'd be like holding a rally in support of Thanksgiving. You know Thanksgiving is coming no matter what, so why go make a fuss about it?

-Jag
Dahak
Frankfurter
Level: 57

Posts: 310/772
EXP: 1437252
For next: 48685

Since: 12.5.02
From: Junction City OR.

Since last post: 1969 days
Last activity: 1622 days
#6 Posted on 27.10.02 1232.03
Reposted on: 27.10.09 1235.22
God I am so fucking tired of this shit. Anyone correct me if I am wrong. If Sadam continues to violate the UN treaties he signed after he lost the Gulf War and continues to make ABC weapons then the US will attack. So what is the big deal? They are violating their treaty. If they do that it is an act of war. If they want the treaty changed then Iraq should go to the effort to try to change it. Or they could just quit making 1000's of tons of chemical weapons that wouldn't even be effective against soldiers. Only against civilain targets.
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 698/2104
EXP: 6556465
For next: 94225

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 7 days
#7 Posted on 27.10.02 1840.21
Reposted on: 27.10.09 1845.49
Well, by your rational we need to invade North Korea, not Iraq, as they have actually admitted that they've broken all those nice "we won't make nukes" resolutions that they signed. Oh wait, North Korea doesn't have any oil. My bad.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 103

Posts: 618/3024
EXP: 11159900
For next: 311545

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 5 hours
AIM:  
#8 Posted on 27.10.02 1949.38
Reposted on: 27.10.09 1958.59

    Originally posted by PalpatineW
    Fuzzy, when you make a point about the validity of the "American mindset," you should probably introduce facts and principles not related to the popularity of said mindset with the "international communuity." If France and Sweden say something is bad, does that mean that I should think it's bad? Your posts lead me to believe that, yes, this is your position.

    Also, Charlton Heston is my President.



The protest was in Washington DC. Most of the "liberal media" all but ignored it, but there were estimated to be over 100,000 people and it was carried live on C-SPAN, with the afore-mentioned pro-war rally covered that night on the same channel. What exactly is your point?

Oh, and Dahak, we have no proof Saddam is making said weapons. We just think he might. That's why we're calling it a preemptive strike. Just like there was no American war against Islam, but there could've been, so Bin Laden was able to convince some lunatic fringe cocksuckers to create a "preemptive strike" against us last September. The whole thing is miserably anti-American and fueled in little more than oil and personal petty revenge.

But, hey, Bush said it, so we've all got to be gung-ho, right?
Dahak
Frankfurter
Level: 57

Posts: 314/772
EXP: 1437252
For next: 48685

Since: 12.5.02
From: Junction City OR.

Since last post: 1969 days
Last activity: 1622 days
#9 Posted on 27.10.02 2001.45
Reposted on: 27.10.09 2002.21
Oh we have no proof huh? So what about the 8,000 tons of mustard gas found in 98? And North Korea is different. We did not beat North Korea in a war and they signed a treaty. They made an agreement. I don't understand why North Korea needs nukes since they are pretty much just a part of China anyway.
But doesn't some part of the responsibility for avoiding war belong to Iraq? If the US just attacked Iraq that would be different but if Iraq refuses to follow through on the treaty they signed that is an act of war. If that seems unfair they shouldn't have invaded, killed of 1000's of Quwaitis, refused to leave, and then got their ass kicked should they?
Fuzzy Logic
Summer sausage
Level: 44

Posts: 384/430
EXP: 600254
For next: 11035

Since: 31.3.02
From: Happy Valley - Goose Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Since last post: 3160 days
Last activity: 2884 days
ICQ:  
#10 Posted on 27.10.02 2026.41
Reposted on: 27.10.09 2029.02
Actually, I knew a guy from a li'l town in China, that was just across a river from North Korea... If'n you were to throw a rock towards North Korea from said town, they would open fire.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 103

Posts: 620/3024
EXP: 11159900
For next: 311545

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 5 hours
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 27.10.02 2152.43
Reposted on: 27.10.09 2153.00
Again, no one likes the source, I realize, but *this* is what I was talking about:
(image removed)

(edited by OlFuzzyBastard on 27.10.02 2253)
pieman
As young as
he feels
Level: 111

Posts: 689/3558
EXP: 14459022
For next: 409384

Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 18 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#12 Posted on 28.10.02 0715.19
Reposted on: 28.10.09 0715.40
Thanks, Fuzzy! That is an outstanding picture. Speaks 1000 words!
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 525/4700
EXP: 21445676
For next: 390986

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1212 days
Last activity: 1009 days
#13 Posted on 28.10.02 0816.26
Reposted on: 28.10.09 0816.58
You could substitute the words with "Rally in Support of Christmas Shopping." Something so widely supported doesn't draw a crowd.
pieman
As young as
he feels
Level: 111

Posts: 691/3558
EXP: 14459022
For next: 409384

Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 18 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#14 Posted on 28.10.02 1020.59
Reposted on: 28.10.09 1029.01
Yeah, like when the Yankees win the World Series (usually) and hundreds of thousands of people show up to cheer. Yeah, those are really badly attended rallies.
Fletch
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 66/89
EXP: 55845
For next: 2506

Since: 17.7.02
From: Columbus, Ohio

Since last post: 4309 days
Last activity: 4306 days
#15 Posted on 28.10.02 1318.40
Reposted on: 28.10.09 1329.03
    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    Again, no one likes the source, I realize, but *this* is what I was talking about...


Well, I like the source... Sure, BC's "BFEE" tripe makes about as much sense as Jack Chick's "The Pope = Satan" bullshit. But at the same time he can make a good point.

I liked him so much better, though, in his "Rush Limba: Lying Nazi Whore" days. Check it out.


    Originally posted by Moe Gates
    Well, by your rational we need to invade North Korea, not Iraq, as they have actually admitted that they've broken all those nice "we won't make nukes" resolutions that they signed. Oh wait, North Korea doesn't have any oil. My bad.


The logic of this makes so much sense that I don't understand how anyone can read it and still support our current course of action against Iraq.

(edited by Fletch on 28.10.02 1419)

(edited by Fletch on 28.10.02 1419)
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 244/1759
EXP: 4898246
For next: 94624

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1258 days
Last activity: 24 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#16 Posted on 28.10.02 1325.30
Reposted on: 28.10.09 1329.08
The reason why pro-war demonstrators are not showing up is because THEY ARE GETTING THEIR WAY... why waste time showing up for something like that?
Besides... a certain kind of person shows up to rallies like that... and thay type tends to be more Pro-war...
and as far as North Korea goes... yup, we are not attacking them now... one step at a time. They are going to be the hardest of the "Axis of Evil" to invade, so we are saving them for last. Imagine how easy Iran is going to be to take out once they are surrounded after we take out Iraq!
Fletch
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 67/89
EXP: 55845
For next: 2506

Since: 17.7.02
From: Columbus, Ohio

Since last post: 4309 days
Last activity: 4306 days
#17 Posted on 28.10.02 1338.28
Reposted on: 28.10.09 1346.48

    Originally posted by Pool-Boy
    ...and as far as North Korea goes... yup, we are not attacking them now... one step at a time. They are going to be the hardest of the "Axis of Evil" to invade, so we are saving them for last. Imagine how easy Iran is going to be to take out once they are surrounded after we take out Iraq!


Oh really?

Click Here

Excerpt:
"Earlier, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said Pyongyang's nuclear programme was a 'serious violation' of the 1994 deal under which North Korea agreed to halt its nuclear weapons programme in return for light water reactors.

However, he went on, Washington viewed the problem in a different light from Iraq - which President Bush has threatened with military action over its weapons programme.

'These are different regions, different problems,' Mr McClellan said.

'We are seeking a peaceful solution,' he added. 'This is best addressed through diplomatic channels at this point.'".


Unless the Bush administration is chock full of liars, it looks like we will not be invading North Korea. So, you tell me, what makes this member of the "Axis of Evil" different?
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 246/1759
EXP: 4898246
For next: 94624

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1258 days
Last activity: 24 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#18 Posted on 28.10.02 1404.52
Reposted on: 28.10.09 1405.33
What idiot would come out and say "We plan to attack you, but our forces are dedicated elsewhere right now, so you will have to wait?" If any of our politicians had said something like that, They should be shot...
I WANT them out there negotiating with North Korea right now. Iraq had ten years of chances... they blew their chance at a peaceful solution. But North Korea has time simply because we do not have the strategic position or the available forces to attack them right now. We tell them we are interested in peace (and we are) because we want them to take negotiations seriously.
Mark my words- if North Korea does not back down in these negotiations... you will see some war-talk somewhere down the line... just not while we are mobilizing for Iraq... one at a time!
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 702/2104
EXP: 6556465
For next: 94225

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 7 days
#19 Posted on 28.10.02 1411.19
Reposted on: 28.10.09 1415.37
So let me get this straight. All available intelligence says that North Korea is a lot closer to getting nukes than Iraq. So let's invade Iraq first THEN invade North Korea. Makes a lot of sense.
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 248/1759
EXP: 4898246
For next: 94624

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1258 days
Last activity: 24 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#20 Posted on 28.10.02 1418.12
Reposted on: 28.10.09 1421.36
1) Nukes is not the primary reason we are attacking Iraq. It has stronger ties with terrorism than North Korea does, and this is, after all, a war on TERROR.
2)Iraq with a nuke, is a much more dangerous thing than North Korea. North Korea has China, a nuclear superpower, at its back door holding it in check. Iraq has no such thing stopping it from lobbing a nuke in any number of directions.
3)North Korea is a much harder target to hit than Iraq right now. And for the overall War on Terror, a strategic position in Iraq is prefereble right now, since the majority of our targets are in that general area.
4)Our forces are already being committed to Iraq. If you are going to use troops, you do not waste them.
It should be obvious that all of our moves in the war on terror are carfully calculated. We are not just attcking Iraq "for the hell of it." There is a bigger picture here... and it makes no sense at this point to toss troops into North Korea at this point. The time for that stage of the campaign is later.
Pages: 1 2 3 NextThread ahead: Wellstone Memorial Decried as Political Rally
Next thread: A Nightmare in the Senate
Previous thread: This forum
(1981 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Susan Sarandon is stupidRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.258 seconds.