The W
Views: 98955028
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
17.9.07 0048
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - So who wants to annex Canada? Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(1996 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (23 total)
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 683/2104
EXP: 6571258
For next: 79432

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 28 days
Last activity: 1 day
#1 Posted on 16.10.02 1231.31
Reposted on: 16.10.09 1235.42
Click Here

What really surprised me is that 20% of Canadians WANT to be annexed by us. They must have underrepresented Quebec. Although I still can't figure out if they Cactually hate Canada more than us.
Promote this thread!
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 485/4700
EXP: 21496090
For next: 340572

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1233 days
Last activity: 1030 days
#2 Posted on 16.10.02 1259.54
Reposted on: 16.10.09 1300.43
You're damn right I want Canada. It's all about the oil!.

All kidding aside, there was one hairbrained scheme a few years back(when Quebec was prepping for a secession referendum) that the US would pick up the Maritime Provinces
(NF, PEI, NS and NB) since there would be an independent Quebec in between the two countries.

I'd still love to get that oil. Plus, BC, Alberta, and Manitoba would further tilt the country Republican.
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 684/2104
EXP: 6571258
For next: 79432

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 28 days
Last activity: 1 day
#3 Posted on 16.10.02 1511.52
Reposted on: 16.10.09 1517.10
You think annexing Canada would tilt the country Republican?

And you're thinking Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatawan (or however the hell you spell that). B.C. is more along your Latte-swilling Seattle/Portland kind of vibe.

I kind of liked the idea of getting the maritime provinces. They'd probably cost us money in the short-term, since they're poorer than average, but it might have worked in the long run. But I'm kind of an expansionist when it comes to more states (Puerto Rico, D.C., Pacific territories). I'm convinced that the reason there haven't been any states added is that 50 is just too nice a number to mess with. I mean "53, nifty, United States, from 13 original colonies" just doesn't work. Plus there would be the whole star design thing to think about.

Kidding aside, it's the worry of upsetting the partisan balance that probably is the main reason. but Canada might work. It would definitely make the House more Democratic, and voting for president would be 75% Dem, but but the Senate might be a split.

Ontario & B.C. can be counted on to go Dem. The Plains states (see above) can probably be counted on to go moderate G.O.P. Quebec will elect their nutty guys and probably go with whoever gives them the most Frenchy stuff, which could be either party. The maritimes would probably be swing states along the lines of Maine. So that's pretty even.

Any actual Canadians have an opinion on this one?

EDIT: Uh, make that "13 original colonies." Sorry.

(edited by MoeGates on 16.10.02 1614)
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 486/4700
EXP: 21496090
For next: 340572

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1233 days
Last activity: 1030 days
#4 Posted on 16.10.02 1519.50
Reposted on: 16.10.09 1526.16
I agree about the Maritimes. My understanding of the Maritime economy circa 1995 when I saw this article was that their economy was in a negative situation and that it would take a lot of work to get it on up to where it needed to be.

As far as adding states. Sure. If DC wants to be a state, let it be a state, but none of this "let's pass a law to get a voting rep" business like they've been trying for a while because that's grossly unconstitutional.

Puerto Rico too. Either become a state or become independent. They can handle it. I'm less sure regarding some of the Pacific Territories(I just don't see American Samoa making it as a full fledged state).

Of course it would be nice to get everything in between as a state too(especially Cuba) but I think my feelings of Manifest Desitny are being taken a tad too far.
Fuzzy Logic
Summer sausage
Level: 44

Posts: 341/430
EXP: 601633
For next: 9656

Since: 31.3.02
From: Happy Valley - Goose Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Since last post: 3181 days
Last activity: 2905 days
ICQ:  
#5 Posted on 16.10.02 1532.51
Reposted on: 16.10.09 1533.43
Here is a rough explanation of Canadian political loyalties, geographically speaking:

The Atlantic Provinces (New Brunswick, Newfoundland & Labrador, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. The Maritine Provinces doesn't include Newfoundland & Labrador) are basically communists. We're all so poor, we rely on each other and our governments for help.

Central Canada (Ontario and Quebec) is a wierd spot. Ontario tends to be a "swing" province. They're government has varied over the years (from tree hugging hippies to evil capitalists), yet they are generally middle of the road types. Much of Southern Ontario is basically like The USA, so you don't see much difference. And Quebec, well, they're Quebec. I can't explain Quebec, but someone from Quebec could.

Western Canada (Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan) are basically capitalist pig dogs. They would fit in wonderfully with the USA. Saskatchewan is the poorest of the bunch, but still capitalist pigdogs. I believe capitalist pig dog-ishness develops from farming. There is lots of farming here (and oil in Alberta).

British Columbia is full of tree hugging hippies, and you know what they're like.

Northern Canada (consisting of the Yukon Territory, North West Territory, and Nunavut. Also, Labrador and Northern Quebec can be considered part of Northern Canada, but aren't) is another odd part. Not a lot of people, a shitload of resources and a shitload of infrastructure would need to be built to get said resources, and people to build infrastructure for to get said resources. Politically, they're out for what's best for them, over the long term (or at least what they percieve as the long term).

note: This post is basically in jest, and is an exageration of reality in canada, but is partially true.
Fletch
Cotechino
Level: 22

Posts: 42/89
EXP: 55976
For next: 2375

Since: 17.7.02
From: Columbus, Ohio

Since last post: 4330 days
Last activity: 4327 days
#6 Posted on 16.10.02 1552.09
Reposted on: 16.10.09 1559.01

    Originally posted by Fuzzy Logic
    Western Canada (Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan) are basically capitalist pig dogs. They would fit in wonderfully with the USA.


Ha ha ha h... hey!

Politics aside, just think how dangerous annexing Canada would be for the world of wrestling fandom. If we didn't have a Canada, how would smarks know which wrestlers to prefer?! There's nothing worse than a confused poseur.
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator
Level: 139

Posts: 1124/6009
EXP: 31812395
For next: 655132

Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
#7 Posted on 16.10.02 1658.52
Reposted on: 16.10.09 1659.01
You do realize that there are nearly as many people living in Mexico City (approx 25-30 million depending on estimates) as there are Canadians, right? (est. 33 million last time I looked it up).

It wouldn't make the shift 75% Democrat. At most, they could move the total by 30 million. Assuming an even balance give or take now, thats like 180 / 330 million... Just about a 10 % difference from 150 / 330 million. (54.5 Dem / 45.4 Rep) assuming that every single one of them was of voting age and would vote Democrat (again, it's probably not a 50/50 split at this point, but the change in votes is all I'm trying to illustrate

I am very much playing fast and loose with the numbers. Don't nitpick the math too much.
El Nastio
Andouille
Level: 90

Posts: 589/2226
EXP: 7145229
For next: 43407

Since: 14.1.02
From: Ottawa Ontario, by way of Walkerton

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 6 min.
ICQ:  
#8 Posted on 16.10.02 1759.37
Reposted on: 16.10.09 1800.03
Atlantic Canada: Would vote DC.
Ontario: Whatever works for us, we're selfish.
Quebec: They'd vote for PQ/BQ. You really think they'd drop that after they join the 'melting pot society'? Those who don't want to seperate WILL want to seperate if the USA takes us over.
West: Rightwing beliefs, so probably Republician.
North: What Fuzzy said.


When it comes to Canadian politics, two things are the key. Ontario and Quebec. The BQ has been able to be the number two party soley on Quebec (higher population means more ridings) while the Liberals have been able to gain a majority government twice now based on the obscene amount of ridings in Ontario. Of course, outside of Quebec, the treasonous punks of the BQ get nothing.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 580/7534
EXP: 43562499
For next: 739263

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 443 days
Last activity: 443 days
#9 Posted on 16.10.02 1852.21
Reposted on: 16.10.09 1855.55
Does this mean we'd have to listen to Anne Murray? On the plus side, could we incorporate the Canadian Holidays, thus giving us many more (especially those of us who celebrate VJ Day and consider Patriots Day Holidays already .)
MoeGates
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 685/2104
EXP: 6571258
For next: 79432

Since: 6.1.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 28 days
Last activity: 1 day
#10 Posted on 16.10.02 2002.26
Reposted on: 16.10.09 2025.51
That two Thanksgivings thing might be weird though.

I'm down for getting July 1st and July 4th off though. That'd make a heck of a long weekend in the right circumstances.

It wouldn't make the shift 75% Democrat.

No no, I meant 75% of Canadians would vote Democrat if they were part of the U.S., not that it would make ALL the U.S. 75% Dem. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

The thing that strikes me about Canadian politics is how regional it seems. The Liberals seem to be the only party that can compete in the whole country. The Canadian Alliance, Bloq Quebec, and N.D.P. seem only to be competitive in a few Provinces at most.

I mean, the South and West are more GOP and the Coasts more Dem here, but it's a rare state where one of the two major parties isn't even competitive (maybe Idaho and West Virginia). I mean, Massachusettes has a GOP governor, and Alaska has a Dem governor. You don't see that kind of stuff in Canada.

(edited by MoeGates on 16.10.02 2104)
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 585/7534
EXP: 43562499
For next: 739263

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 443 days
Last activity: 443 days
#11 Posted on 16.10.02 2004.53
Reposted on: 16.10.09 2028.25

    Originally posted by MoeGates
    That two Thanksgivings thing might be weird though.

    I'm down for getting July 1st and July 4th off though. That'd make a heck of a long weekend iooin the right circumstances.

    It wouldn't make the shift 75% Democrat. as

    No no, I meant 75% of Canadians would vote Democrat if they were part of the U.S., not that it would make ALL the U.S. 75% Dem. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

    The thing that strikes me about Canadian politics is how regional it seems. The Liberals seem to be the only party that can compete in the whole country. The Canadian Alliance, Bloq Quebec, and N.D.P. seem only to be competitive in a few provices at most.

    I mean, the South and West are more GOP and the Coasts more Dem here, but it's a rare state where one of the two major parties isn't even competitive. I mean, Massachusettes has a GOP governor, and Alaska has a Dem governor. You don't see that kind of stuff in Canada.






That's why you use sick days and claim to your boss your Canadian to pull the very long weekend. Mass. might have had Republican governors for the past 12 years, but they were liberal republicans and the Democratic hacks in the state legislature maintained control of their kickbacks.
Socks
Landjager
Level: 60

Posts: 258/888
EXP: 1768434
For next: 4354

Since: 25.6.02
From: Ottawa

Since last post: 785 days
Last activity: 398 days
#12 Posted on 16.10.02 2011.05
Reposted on: 16.10.09 2029.01
We will take you on. There is no way you can get through our strong STRONG defense.

We have the most complex defense system in the world.

Canoe's and Sling Shots!

HaHa suckers......come and get us...


Err.......opps
Pool-Boy
Lap cheong
Level: 81

Posts: 176/1759
EXP: 4909817
For next: 83053

Since: 1.8.02
From: Huntington Beach, CA

Since last post: 1279 days
Last activity: 45 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#13 Posted on 17.10.02 1333.38
Reposted on: 17.10.09 1336.22
I think one mistake you are making is ASSUMING that new citizens in Canadian providences would become either Republican or Democrat. Canada is NOT a 2 party nation, and I would assume that the former Canadians would not embrace our ridiculous notion that "If you do not vote Democrat or Republican, you are wasting your vote." In all honesty, they will probably remain in whatever party they are in now, and it would just splinter off from the Canadian version and become its own entity. The only problem I would have with absorbing some of Canada is their socialistic tendancies... all you have to do it look at their failing health-care system (new citizens do not get state-sponsored health care? Wassupwithdat?), and outrageously high taxes to see how it does not work... though you can get a kick ass 2 topping large pizza in Windsor for about $7 American!
The shake-up would be great. Bring it on!!!
Oh, and DEFINITLY add Puerto Rico, Samoans, Virgin Islands, etc as states. Our flag is getting boring! Hell, we will take Japan too!
The Goon
Boudin blanc
Moderator
Level: 94

Posts: 312/2425
EXP: 8134918
For next: 221770

Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 42 days
Last activity: 1 day
#14 Posted on 18.10.02 1454.24
Reposted on: 18.10.09 1454.24
This thread is scaring me...time to hole up in the basement with my hockey sticks and beer. Where's the poll on Canada annexing the US?

If I can be serious for a minute... I can see us(Canada and the USA) moving to a common currency before not too long(say, within ten years).
Grimis
Scrapple
Level: 124

Posts: 505/4700
EXP: 21496090
For next: 340572

Since: 11.7.02
From: MD

Since last post: 1233 days
Last activity: 1030 days
#15 Posted on 18.10.02 1535.55
Reposted on: 18.10.09 1549.02
All of this will give the US one hell of a hockey team...
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 110

Posts: 736/3504
EXP: 14127425
For next: 281507

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 268 days
Last activity: 9 days
#16 Posted on 18.10.02 1605.15
Reposted on: 18.10.09 1616.38
Actually, there's a small movement growing in Western Canada to see if we can get outta Canada. Y'see...

The Liberal Party is in power. They always get the Parliment seats in Ontario & Quebec, and that's all the have to get (because you need half to get majority, and PQ & ONT ARE half). So, the Liberals spent all the tax money from the rich provinces (Alberta, BC, Ontario) on Ontario and the East (where their supporters are). This makes Western Canada angry.

My idea is for BC, Alberta, Yukon & NW Territories to cecede from Canada and join the US, that way we'd get more money outta the deal. Because as long as Canada is billions of dollars in debt, and/or run by the Liberals, we're screwed. And don't get me started on Kyoto...
Fuzzy Logic
Summer sausage
Level: 44

Posts: 346/430
EXP: 601633
For next: 9656

Since: 31.3.02
From: Happy Valley - Goose Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Since last post: 3181 days
Last activity: 2905 days
ICQ:  
#17 Posted on 18.10.02 1817.46
Reposted on: 18.10.09 1819.04
There's grumblings over Newfoundland cecession too... But that's just silly crazy talk.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 152

Posts: 622/7534
EXP: 43562499
For next: 739263

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 443 days
Last activity: 443 days
#18 Posted on 18.10.02 2002.12
Reposted on: 18.10.09 2006.44

    Originally posted by The Goon
    This thread is scaring me...time to hole up in the basement with my hockey sticks and beer. Where's the poll on Canada annexing the US?

    If I can be serious for a minute... I can see us(Canada and the USA) moving to a common currency before not too long(say, within ten years).






Why would the US devalue its currency by joining with Canada?
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator
Level: 139

Posts: 1129/6009
EXP: 31812395
For next: 655132

Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 15 hours
AIM:  
#19 Posted on 18.10.02 2125.06
Reposted on: 18.10.09 2129.01

    Originally posted by redsoxnation

      Originally posted by The Goon
      This thread is scaring me...time to hole up in the basement with my hockey sticks and beer. Where's the poll on Canada annexing the US?

      If I can be serious for a minute... I can see us(Canada and the USA) moving to a common currency before not too long(say, within ten years).






    Why would the US devalue its currency by joining with Canada?



Poutine.
Socks
Landjager
Level: 60

Posts: 264/888
EXP: 1768434
For next: 4354

Since: 25.6.02
From: Ottawa

Since last post: 785 days
Last activity: 398 days
#20 Posted on 18.10.02 2229.40
Reposted on: 18.10.09 2230.10

    Originally posted by Guru Zim

      Originally posted by redsoxnation

        Originally posted by The Goon
        This thread is scaring me...time to hole up in the basement with my hockey sticks and beer. Where's the poll on Canada annexing the US?

        If I can be serious for a minute... I can see us(Canada and the USA) moving to a common currency before not too long(say, within ten years).






      Why would the US devalue its currency by joining with Canada?



    Poutine.




Not just Poutine, but Italian Poutine with Mayo! YUM
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: What the Iraqi civilians can teach the Americans
Next thread: CNN semi-stupidity
Previous thread: Falwell's comments on Islam
(1996 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - So who wants to annex Canada?Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.312 seconds.