The W
Views: 101534080
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.12.07 0441
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Nicole Bass trial complete
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(7963 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (9 total)
El Nastio
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 575/2243
EXP: 7301958
For next: 166983

Since: 14.1.02
From: Ottawa Ontario, by way of Walkerton

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 6 hours
ICQ:  
#1 Posted on 8.10.02 1954.36
Reposted on: 8.10.09 1959.05

And the winner IS.....



From WWE.com

A U.S. Federal District Court jury in the Nicole Bass sexual harassment lawsuit unanimously exonerated WWE and defendant Steve Lombardi of any wrongdoing. The sexual harassment lawsuit brought by Ms. Bass had no factual foundation and the jury, in its decision, saw that clearly. This was nothing but an attempt to smear WWE's good name in an attempt to make an easy dollar. WWE views today's verdict as vindication of our corporate name and reputation.
Promote this thread!
El Pescado
Kolbasz
Level: 46

Posts: 158/463
EXP: 685586
For next: 26193

Since: 3.1.02
From: Toms River, NJ

Since last post: 1232 days
Last activity: 1055 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on 8.10.02 1955.56
Reposted on: 8.10.09 1959.07
Did anyone think she'd actually win? Congrats WWE! Now can you dig that? SUCKAAAAA!!
Faust
Salami
Level: 32

Posts: 167/204
EXP: 196133
For next: 10311

Since: 27.7.02

Since last post: 4444 days
Last activity: 4389 days
#3 Posted on 9.10.02 0116.10
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0117.40
" . . . an attempt to smear WWE's good name . . . "

hee hee!


ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 133

Posts: 1148/5387
EXP: 27184333
For next: 668407

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 186 days
Last activity: 24 days
#4 Posted on 9.10.02 0122.51
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0126.51
Do you mean that WWE actually is a good name for the fed?

Or do you mean that they actually have credibility in the media?

Either way, that's a pretty funny way of putting it.
AndrewGilkison
Linguica
Level: 21

Posts: 66/74
EXP: 43024
For next: 6920

Since: 20.6.02

Since last post: 3532 days
Last activity: 2807 days
#5 Posted on 9.10.02 0417.58
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0418.26
What was this woman thinking? She had no case from the start. Nice job WWE!

(edited by AndrewGilkison on 9.10.02 0219)
tomvejada
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 809/2247
EXP: 7330791
For next: 138150

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 4133 days
Last activity: 4133 days
#6 Posted on 9.10.02 0638.20
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0638.46
I hope I never have to look at her face again.
evilwaldo
Lap cheong
Level: 78

Posts: 715/1597
EXP: 4375702
For next: 6543

Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 3467 days
Last activity: 3248 days
AIM:  
#7 Posted on 9.10.02 0830.58
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0837.22
I think you need to be a female before you sue for sexual harassment.

mountinman44
Sujuk
Level: 63

Posts: 280/974
EXP: 2063955
For next: 33208

Since: 8.5.02
From: San Diego, CA

Since last post: 1311 days
Last activity: 1157 days
Y!:
#8 Posted on 9.10.02 1006.07
Reposted on: 9.10.09 1015.49
Now Mr. Bass can go back to making her S&M videos. There's a great career move.
humanmeal
Mettwurst
Level: 29

Posts: 130/160
EXP: 138194
For next: 9692

Since: 17.3.02
From: East Bay Area, California

Since last post: 4206 days
Last activity: 3482 days
#9 Posted on 9.10.02 1226.00
Reposted on: 9.10.09 1229.01
From Newsday's article on same (link via Slashwrestling):

"Juror Cliff Hasey, 44, of Nassau County, appeared to be the only wrestling fan on the jury and said it was tough not being able to ask all the wrestling stars for autographs after they testified. But a smiling Hasey said Lombardi, a former wrestler, autographed his juror pass when the case ended yesterday."

Bass doesn't have unlimited funds, so the case probably dies here.

But given that every other juror quoted (a hideous practice that has become far too common; there are protections in place in California if jurors want to use them) said credibility (lack thereof) was the entire basis for the decision, and there's one guy on the jury who is sitting there by his own admission hungering for the autographs of one side exclusively... . In other circumstances, all jurors would be interviewed for additional signs that the jury was NOT impartial or was possibly lead/unduly influenced by the fan Hasey and/or celebrity status of witnesses for one side. Results of those interviews might very well form the basis for appeal, given that in the Federal system you need just a 2-1 plurality to prevail in civil actions (that's from memory; the key point is that it doesn't have to be unanimous and the number needed is lower than in many state courts).
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Kane/Triple H's new angle
Next thread: Murderer?! COOL!
Previous thread: GBU for Raw
(7963 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Nicole Bass trial completeRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.319 seconds.