The W
Views: 118515307
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
9.12.09 1909
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Nicole Bass trial complete
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(8887 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (9 total)
El Nastio
Boudin blanc
Level: 96

Posts: 575/2426
EXP: 8816062
For next: 172757

Since: 14.1.02
From: Ottawa Ontario, by way of Walkerton

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
ICQ:  
#1 Posted on 8.10.02 1954.36
Reposted on: 8.10.09 1959.05

And the winner IS.....



From WWE.com

A U.S. Federal District Court jury in the Nicole Bass sexual harassment lawsuit unanimously exonerated WWE and defendant Steve Lombardi of any wrongdoing. The sexual harassment lawsuit brought by Ms. Bass had no factual foundation and the jury, in its decision, saw that clearly. This was nothing but an attempt to smear WWE's good name in an attempt to make an easy dollar. WWE views today's verdict as vindication of our corporate name and reputation.
Promote this thread!
El Pescado
Kolbasz
Level: 47

Posts: 158/463
EXP: 735766
For next: 30443

Since: 3.1.02
From: Toms River, NJ

Since last post: 1951 days
Last activity: 1774 days
AIM:  
#2 Posted on 8.10.02 1955.56
Reposted on: 8.10.09 1959.07
Did anyone think she'd actually win? Congrats WWE! Now can you dig that? SUCKAAAAA!!
Faust
Salami
Level: 33

Posts: 167/204
EXP: 211114
For next: 18068

Since: 27.7.02

Since last post: 5162 days
Last activity: 5107 days
#3 Posted on 9.10.02 0116.10
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0117.40
" . . . an attempt to smear WWE's good name . . . "

hee hee!


ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 137

Posts: 1148/5543
EXP: 30454046
For next: 418887

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 10 hours
#4 Posted on 9.10.02 0122.51
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0126.51
Do you mean that WWE actually is a good name for the fed?

Or do you mean that they actually have credibility in the media?

Either way, that's a pretty funny way of putting it.
AndrewGilkison
Linguica
Level: 21

Posts: 66/74
EXP: 46284
For next: 3660

Since: 20.6.02

Since last post: 4250 days
Last activity: 3525 days
#5 Posted on 9.10.02 0417.58
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0418.26
What was this woman thinking? She had no case from the start. Nice job WWE!

(edited by AndrewGilkison on 9.10.02 0219)
tomvejada
Andouille
Level: 93

Posts: 809/2247
EXP: 7867219
For next: 185621

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 4852 days
Last activity: 4852 days
#6 Posted on 9.10.02 0638.20
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0638.46
I hope I never have to look at her face again.
evilwaldo
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 715/1597
EXP: 4698260
For next: 84729

Since: 7.2.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 4186 days
Last activity: 3966 days
AIM:  
#7 Posted on 9.10.02 0830.58
Reposted on: 9.10.09 0837.22
I think you need to be a female before you sue for sexual harassment.

mountinman44
Sujuk
Level: 65

Posts: 280/974
EXP: 2218987
For next: 116653

Since: 8.5.02
From: San Diego, CA

Since last post: 2029 days
Last activity: 345 days
Y!:
#8 Posted on 9.10.02 1006.07
Reposted on: 9.10.09 1015.49
Now Mr. Bass can go back to making her S&M videos. There's a great career move.
humanmeal
Mettwurst
Level: 30

Posts: 130/160
EXP: 148462
For next: 17409

Since: 17.3.02
From: East Bay Area, California

Since last post: 4924 days
Last activity: 4201 days
#9 Posted on 9.10.02 1226.00
Reposted on: 9.10.09 1229.01
From Newsday's article on same (link via Slashwrestling):

"Juror Cliff Hasey, 44, of Nassau County, appeared to be the only wrestling fan on the jury and said it was tough not being able to ask all the wrestling stars for autographs after they testified. But a smiling Hasey said Lombardi, a former wrestler, autographed his juror pass when the case ended yesterday."

Bass doesn't have unlimited funds, so the case probably dies here.

But given that every other juror quoted (a hideous practice that has become far too common; there are protections in place in California if jurors want to use them) said credibility (lack thereof) was the entire basis for the decision, and there's one guy on the jury who is sitting there by his own admission hungering for the autographs of one side exclusively... . In other circumstances, all jurors would be interviewed for additional signs that the jury was NOT impartial or was possibly lead/unduly influenced by the fan Hasey and/or celebrity status of witnesses for one side. Results of those interviews might very well form the basis for appeal, given that in the Federal system you need just a 2-1 plurality to prevail in civil actions (that's from memory; the key point is that it doesn't have to be unanimous and the number needed is lower than in many state courts).
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Kane/Triple H's new angle
Next thread: Murderer?! COOL!
Previous thread: GBU for Raw
(8887 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - Nicole Bass trial completeRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.393 seconds.