The W
Views: 110004369
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
5.2.09 2112
The 7 - Hockey - Hockey Standings Register and log in to post!
(521 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (7 total)
Mr. Boffo
Scrapple
Level: 116

Posts: 232/3844
EXP: 16963315
For next: 360830

Since: 24.3.02
From: Oshkosh, WI

Since last post: 922 days
Last activity: 882 days
#1 Posted on 14.9.02 2010.23
Reposted on: 14.9.09 2015.20
Ok, I'm really not a fan of hockey, I'm just here to ask a question on something that has always bothered me. Not enough for me to find out, mind you, but still has bothered me.

When they show a hockey team's standing, they show 4 numbers, as in 1-2-3-1. Now, I know that three of those have to be wins, losses, and ties, but what is the other one? And what order are they in?
Promote this thread!
Jubuki
Kolbasz
Level: 47

Posts: 355/482
EXP: 744695
For next: 21514

Since: 16.7.02

Since last post: 4863 days
Last activity: 4846 days
#2 Posted on 14.9.02 2226.21
Reposted on: 14.9.09 2229.01
The last one is for overtime losses. Teams now get 1 point for those while the winning team gets its two, which COMPLETELY RUINS THE FUCKING GAME worse than the DH ever could for baseball. You shouldn't be rewarded for LOSING. Doesn't matter how freaking tough you play your opponent - if you lose, you lose and get precisely dick for it. I don't see them giving teams in the SCPlayoffs .5 games for losing in overtime - why do it in the regular season? Fuck Bettman and his bunches of stooges.
chazerizer
Italian
Level: 35

Posts: 211/242
EXP: 265068
For next: 14870

Since: 11.7.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 4861 days
Last activity: 1317 days
AIM:  
#3 Posted on 16.9.02 0035.36
Reposted on: 16.9.09 0035.36
yeah, but here's the thing. When you only have 5 minutes (and not unlimited overtime) you really wanna see someone win. If a team really needs the 1 point, they have it and they can take risks and try to win the game. This (theoretically, anyway) makes for less actual ties and more actual excitement. I know I'd much ratehr see a winner than a tie game.
canucklover
Pickled pork
Level: 31

Posts: 32/184
EXP: 175643
For next: 9722

Since: 16.7.02
From: Vancouver, BC

Since last post: 3928 days
Last activity: 3546 days
#4 Posted on 16.9.02 1115.30
Reposted on: 16.9.09 1117.42
Its true: giving each team a point at the end of a tied regulation game and putting another point up for grabs has really enlivened OT (as has moving to 4 on 4 in the 5 minute extra period). Before the change teams were so afraid of losing the single point for a tie that OT was a defensive struggle with no one trying to pot a winner for fear of being exposed at the back. Now with a guaranteed single point, teams are free to go on the offensive.

On the other hand, as Jubuki says, it does seem stupid to reward a team for losing.

Overall, though, I think that the excitement created by the wide-open overtimes is worth the price. Far more games are now won in overtime that under the old rules and so fans get what they want--a winner.
dunkndollaz
Banger
Back to Back Survivor
Level: 98

Posts: 497/2608
EXP: 9554614
For next: 99773

Since: 3.1.02
From: Northern NJ

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#5 Posted on 16.9.02 1155.21
Reposted on: 16.9.09 1155.21
I hate the 4 on 4 aspect of regular season OT - it is only a matter of time before Bettman trys to bring in Shootouts
chazerizer
Italian
Level: 35

Posts: 216/242
EXP: 265068
For next: 14870

Since: 11.7.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 4861 days
Last activity: 1317 days
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 16.9.02 1407.05
Reposted on: 16.9.09 1408.52

    Originally posted by dunkndollaz
    I hate the 4 on 4 aspect of regular season OT - it is only a matter of time before Bettman trys to bring in Shootouts


Dear God, I hope not. That's a terrible way to end any game.
The Goon
Boudin blanc
Moderator
Level: 96

Posts: 289/2464
EXP: 8775211
For next: 213608

Since: 2.1.02
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#7 Posted on 16.9.02 1446.52
Reposted on: 16.9.09 1447.25
What was it that Fleury said...something like "shootouts are about as valid a way of deciding a hockey game as laying a Scrabble board out at centre ice."

With the OT and the extra point, as I understand it, the teams try harder for that extra point when it's an East team vs. a West team, as it doesn't affect playoff standings. But if it's intra-division, they'll play more conservatively.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Predictions
Next thread: Saku Koivu...
Previous thread: Friendly Reminder
(521 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: NHL Free Agent Thread - Free Agency Begins! Yay? - Random bitching about the NHL - More...
The 7 - Hockey - Hockey StandingsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.196 seconds.