The W
Views: 132057108
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.4.11 0307
The 7 - Ladies Only - Sara's Pregnancy Register and log in to post!
(141 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Post (5 total)
Miss Behaving
Level: 11

Posts: 6/16
EXP: 4863
For next: 1123

Since: 30.6.02
From: UK

Since last post: 4998 days
Last activity: 3944 days
#1 Posted on 9.9.02 0319.04
Reposted on: 9.9.09 0320.31
It really disturbs me when real life is brought into wrestling. I know why they did it, instant heel heat for Heyman but surely there must be another way than involving family. Is the Undertaker that desperate for a pop that he must involve his pregnant wife? I understand the divide between a work and real life but there are people who don't.

Then there is Heyman's suggestion about 'looking after' Sara but not the unborn child. Of course its supposed to make my skin crawl, but not look at the tv and think why are they even going there.

I just hope WWE doesn't take this any further, there really are some things that should be kept out of programming, unborn children are way up there.
Promote this thread!
Madame Manga
Boudin rouge
Level: 49

Posts: 96/495
EXP: 848861
For next: 35028

Since: 16.1.02
From: Silicon Valley

Since last post: 638 days
Last activity: 353 days
#2 Posted on 9.9.02 0403.58
Reposted on: 9.9.09 0406.03
That whole interview sounded a lot more like Paul Heyman's idea (or at least his writing) than anyone else's. Didn't Heyman take over the stalker angle near the end, when it really went off the rails? The creepier the better in his way of thinking, I'd imagine. He's written some things for Taker that worked very well, such as the shower scene with David Flair before WM, but it's always got that icky edge to it.

That mock crucifixion stuff Undertaker did a few years back was worse than involving genuine wives and their pregnancies, in my opinion. Now that's something that *should* have stayed off TV.

(Please, Paul E., don't get any ideas...)

Ana Ng
Level: 36

Posts: 25/253
EXP: 304840
For next: 3273

Since: 6.8.02
From: Naples, FL, USA

Since last post: 5115 days
Last activity: 4688 days
#3 Posted on 9.9.02 1107.16
Reposted on: 9.9.09 1127.36
Eh, well, as I've said before, none of what you've mentioned above offends me.

Sara, however, bores me to TEARS. I don't think I can describe how uninterested I am in the Undertaker's wife! The Undertaker, fine, I like him, and I always have. But his wife is incredibly dull on tv, no more, please!
Level: 11

Posts: 5/17
EXP: 5319
For next: 667

Since: 16.7.02
From: Brooklyn, NY

Since last post: 5688 days
Last activity: 5274 days
#4 Posted on 9.9.02 1556.32
Reposted on: 9.9.09 1559.02
I have to agree with Ana. It would be more interesting to me if Sara had any charisma in the ring whatsoever. The whole stalker angle & her appearences on TV are flat.
Cherries > Peaches
Level: 91

Posts: 49/2114
EXP: 7366167
For next: 102774

Since: 1.8.02
From: Phoenix-ish

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 16 hours
#5 Posted on 10.9.02 1812.57
Reposted on: 10.9.09 1829.05
Have we seen Sara other than the stalker storyline? Is she trained as a wrestler?
Do we know whether they have kids already?
Thread ahead: I LOVE CRZ
Next thread: OK, now I'm offended
Previous thread: Soap opera storylines vs. In-ring action
(141 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Ladies Only - Sara's PregnancyRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

©2001-2018 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.187 seconds.