Rudoublesedoublel
Potato korv Level: 53
    Posts: 48/657 EXP: 1089504 For next: 67622
Since: 2.1.02 From: Kentucky - Home of the 8 time NCAA Champ Wildcats
Since last post: 8 days Last activity: 2 days
| #1 Posted on 30.8.02 1112.51 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1113.25 | http://espn.go.com/main.html
According to ESPN.com there will not be a strike. It is difficult to root for either side in this situation. But, how do you fairly carve up a $3.5 BILLION dollar pie?
Let's go Cardinals!!!!! | Promote this thread! |  | Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit Moderator Level: 127
    Posts: 843/5074 EXP: 23383400 For next: 343231
Since: 2.1.02 From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.
Since last post: 8 days Last activity: 8 hours
| #2 Posted on 30.8.02 1148.11 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1159.01 | | grrrr...i was actually pulling for a strike...oh well, maybe they'll have another in 4 years... | Big Bad
Scrapple Level: 141
    Posts: 415/6510 EXP: 33976604 For next: 143494
Since: 4.1.02 From: Dorchester, Ontario
Since last post: 4 days Last activity: 4 hours
| #3 Posted on 30.8.02 1150.17 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1159.03 | | This is great news. Now I can finally start paying attention to baseball again. Go Twins go! | Freeway
Scrapple Level: 108
    Posts: 621/3496 EXP: 13371265 For next: 149278
Since: 3.1.02 From: Calgary
Since last post: 245 days Last activity: 15 days
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #4 Posted on 30.8.02 1310.21 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1319.53 | | Now the hard part: winning the fans back. It'll take more than an apartment in Toronto and Blue Jays season tickets Mr. Selig... But I'm listening... | CajunMan
Boudin blanc No longer registered Level: 93
    Posts: 731/2483 EXP: 8004533 For next: 48307
Since: 2.1.02 From: Give me a Title shot!
Since last post: 608 days Last activity: 407 days
| #5 Posted on 30.8.02 1319.25 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1329.04 | | And the Expos Stay! | mountinman44
Sujuk Level: 62
    Posts: 192/974 EXP: 1936710 For next: 47987
Since: 8.5.02 From: San Diego, CA
Since last post: 760 days Last activity: 606 days
| | | Y!: |  |
|
| #6 Posted on 30.8.02 1326.24 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1329.07 |
Originally posted by CajunMan And the Expos Stay!
Not necessarily... it says MLB cannot contract teams until 2006. It says nothing about selling and relocating the Expos. | evilwaldo
Lap cheong Level: 77
    Posts: 561/1597 EXP: 4111307 For next: 79841
Since: 7.2.02 From: New York, NY
Since last post: 2916 days Last activity: 2697 days
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #7 Posted on 30.8.02 1330.36 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1330.47 | Question about the revenue sharing:
Is there a floor so that the small market teams are forced to spend the money they will be getting or can they just pocket it?
| Gugs
Bierwurst Level: 82
    Posts: 17/1857 EXP: 5060062 For next: 149187
Since: 9.7.02 From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)
Since last post: 27 days Last activity: 1 day
| AIM: | |
| | | Y!: |  |
|
| #8 Posted on 30.8.02 1436.40 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1440.51 | | Nope. There is absolutely nothing stopping the Kansas City Royals or the Detroit Tigers or the Tampa Bay Devil Rays from taking the money, putting it in their back pocket, siting back, and enjoying another 60-102 season. Of course, there's nothing stopping John Henry or George Steinbrenner from saying "Hey! It's been four years and your team still sucks! What the hell's going on?" | WyldeWolf1
Boerewors Level: 40
    Posts: 328/361 EXP: 434716 For next: 6597
Since: 20.6.02 From: Florida
Since last post: 3941 days Last activity: 3940 days
| #9 Posted on 30.8.02 1444.47 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1456.47 | Hallelujah! If baseball had gone away, I'd be forced to cry even more when watching Field of Dreams.
Then I'd have to torture Selig to death.
PS--I know it's not all his fault, so don't start that sub-thread, okay? | redsoxnation
Scrapple Level: 149
    Posts: 109/7530 EXP: 41237391 For next: 97844
Since: 24.7.02
Since last post: 9 days Last activity: 10 hours
| #10 Posted on 30.8.02 1529.24 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1548.11 |
Originally posted by evilwaldo Question about the revenue sharing:
Is there a floor so that the small market teams are forced to spend the money they will be getting or can they just pocket it?
Players don't want a floor because then theoretically it would allow a cap (logic from the Don Fehr school of thought). Today did make me wish Captain Carl Everett was still in Boston though, because him locked in the clubhouse for 4 hours with his teammates waiting for a plane could have provided much amusement. | JayJayDean
Scrapple Level: 122
    Posts: 227/4599 EXP: 20178578 For next: 459494
Since: 2.1.02 From: Seattle, WA
Since last post: 8 days Last activity: 10 hours
| AIM: | |
| | | Y!: |  |
|
| #11 Posted on 30.8.02 1649.36 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1657.49 |
Originally posted by gugs Nope. There is absolutely nothing stopping the Kansas City Royals or the Detroit Tigers or the Tampa Bay Devil Rays from taking the money, putting it in their back pocket, siting back, and enjoying another 60-102 season. Of course, there's nothing stopping John Henry or George Steinbrenner from saying "Hey! It's been four years and your team still sucks! What the hell's going on?"
Yeah, but say you're the Marlins and you already have shitty attendance and a lousy team. I think for a couple of years there will be big time pressure on those teams, especially from the larger teams like the Yankees, to step up and try do to something about it. If it pretty much stays the same I guess they would either have to (1) go back to the way it is now since the large market teams would say giving all the luxury tax and local revenue didn't help or (2) blow it up and go NFL-style, which for baseball would seem completely impossible.
I heard the REAL thing that brought everyone to the bargaining table for so long was Guru's threat to close the baseball forum. I think Peter Gammons said that. | evilwaldo
Lap cheong Level: 77
    Posts: 562/1597 EXP: 4111307 For next: 79841
Since: 7.2.02 From: New York, NY
Since last post: 2916 days Last activity: 2697 days
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #12 Posted on 30.8.02 1807.46 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1811.30 | If the small market teams put money back into their farm systems and rebuild then we should start to see the effects after 4 years.
If they choose to resign players and keep their teams together then that is good also.
But if the money is put into teams pockets and not spent on the franchises then in 4 years then we may see an owners revolt which would be very interesting.
| It's False
Scrapple Level: 134
   Posts: 98/5781 EXP: 27856893 For next: 730155
Since: 20.6.02 From: I am the Tag Team Champions!
Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 6 hours
| #13 Posted on 30.8.02 1837.58 Reposted on: 30.8.09 1839.58 | "DAMN IT, IT SHOULD NEVER HAVE GONE THIS FAR IN THE FIRST PLACE" -CRZ (13.6.2 WWE Smackdown)
So baseball's not going on strike and they expect everything to be all better now. Well, here's a novel concept: FUCK BASEBALL ANYWAY! A strike never should have been threatened to begin with. It's a classic case of a baby threatening to throw a tantrum if he doesn't get what he wants. That analogy applies to BOTH players and owners! Who the hell are they to put themselves on such a high horse and assume that the world revolves around them?
Don't get me wrong, I'm happy they reached an agreement and I'm happy that my dreams for a Freeway World Series are still alive. But I'm just pissed off that it even had to reach that point at all, you know?
If they really want to make things better, they can issue the fans a public apology or something, because not all fans are as forgiving as me. | Confusatron
Braunschweiger Level: 9
    Posts: 1/13 EXP: 2944 For next: 218
Since: 30.8.02 From: Orlando, FL
Since last post: 3919 days Last activity: 3912 days
| #14 Posted on 30.8.02 2039.47 Reposted on: 30.8.09 2040.47 | | Surely we're not supposed to provide the players or owners any good will for taking the negotiations all the way up until the last minute before making a deal. You could make the arguement that it wasn't a strike itself but the wait over the strike that causes the most damage, because they wait until the last week(end) to cover more ground than in several months of earlier talks. Seeing Jayson Stark giving live updates at midnight on ESPNews as the negoations were being hammered out wasn't a scary sight. It was just tired and exasperating. This "whole will they or won't they" period has been. Now that the college football season and the NFL are ready to kick in, we'll see if anyone cares enough to give baseball more than just passing interest. | drjayphd
Scrapple Moderator Level: 113
    Posts: 400/3925 EXP: 15698502 For next: 120107
Since: 22.4.02 From: Connecticut
Since last post: 1 day Last activity: 1 day
| #15 Posted on 30.8.02 2129.06 Reposted on: 30.8.09 2136.42 |
Originally posted by evilwaldo If the small market teams put money back into their farm systems and rebuild then we should start to see the effects after 4 years.
If they choose to resign players and keep their teams together then that is good also.
But if the money is put into teams pockets and not spent on the franchises then in 4 years then we may see an owners revolt which would be very interesting.
So I guess this begs the question: what does baseball do in this event? How do you remove an owner who's content to let their teams rot and pocket the revenue-sharing money? Can they? | evilwaldo
Lap cheong Level: 77
    Posts: 563/1597 EXP: 4111307 For next: 79841
Since: 7.2.02 From: New York, NY
Since last post: 2916 days Last activity: 2697 days
| AIM: | |
| | |
| #16 Posted on 31.8.02 2001.17 Reposted on: 31.8.09 2010.12 |
Originally posted by drjayphd
Originally posted by evilwaldo If the small market teams put money back into their farm systems and rebuild then we should start to see the effects after 4 years.
If they choose to resign players and keep their teams together then that is good also.
But if the money is put into teams pockets and not spent on the franchises then in 4 years then we may see an owners revolt which would be very interesting.
So I guess this begs the question: what does baseball do in this event? How do you remove an owner who's content to let their teams rot and pocket the revenue-sharing money? Can they?
I know that at the end of Marge Schott's reign in Cincinnati there were talks about the commissioner invoking a rule that would remove her from the franchise but I am not clear on the rule.
My concern is that the 6 owners that are probably against this deal sway 3 or 4 owners to their side in 4 years forming a blocking minority that could overrule any deal that might be struck. | rlbehan
Chipolata Level: 25
    Posts: 25/118 EXP: 81074 For next: 8547
Since: 6.7.02 From: Albany
Since last post: 2773 days Last activity: 1556 days
| #17 Posted on 3.9.02 1751.20 Reposted on: 3.9.09 1756.13 | | I'd be a lot happier with the fact that the strike was averted if 1) I was a Braves fan rather than a Mets fan, and 2)Major league baseball found some way to include me in their revenue sharing plan. | | ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |