The W
Views: 103922599
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.4.08 1924
The 7 - Random - IWC
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(3298 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (9 total)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 130

Posts: 906/5128
EXP: 25600154
For next: 130492

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 day
#1 Posted on 17.8.02 0000.05
Reposted on: 17.8.09 0003.51
What the fuck is this shit? IWC? Yeah, I know what it stands for, but who thought this one up? I now see it popping up in threads and columns. Now when someone busts out a great flame or a ***** star point in a thread or column are we suppossed to start chanting I-W-C-I-W-C...! Who pioneered this anyway? Can I jump to the IWF? Why did *we* have to start this. We really are gay aren't we?
Promote this thread!
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 134

Posts: 281/5455
EXP: 28154110
For next: 432938

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 4 hours
#2 Posted on 17.8.02 0126.05
Reposted on: 17.8.09 0129.02
I dunno, man.
That's like asking who thought up the wheel!
That's not a question, but you should probably avoid chanting for anything you see on the internet.
You asked that already!
No.
WE didn't - only the people silly enough to lump everything into a group did blah blah blah blah
Sadly, yes.
FLRockAndLaw
Kishke
Level: 43

Posts: 146/399
EXP: 555642
For next: 9409

Since: 2.1.02
From: Central Florida, somewhere between Orlando and Tampa, U.S.A.

Since last post: 24 days
Last activity: 17 hours
#3 Posted on 17.8.02 1127.31
Reposted on: 17.8.09 1129.01
To answer your questions further:
IWC - anagram for Internet Wrestling Community made up by marks and wrestling geeks and Net geeks.
Who thought it up? Scott Keith will probably lay claim to it, though John D. Williams may dispute that claim. No word from Jeff Amdur about any claim he might make for it...
Are we supposed to chant? Well, perhaps we should change it to Internet Community of Wrestling, so we could chant, "I-C-W!! I-C-W!!" It just rolls off the tongue better, you know? But for now, a "He's hardcore!" chant might be appropriate. But whatever you chant at the privacy of your own Net connection...
Who pioneered this? Asked and answered.
Can I jump to the IWF? Your contract with the IWC has a no-compete clause. So you're stuck for about another 14 months before you can make the jump.
Why did we have to start this? Ummmm... marks, wrestling geeks and Net geeks... what groups out there are more qualified to start it than us?
We really are gay? We're geeks, freaks, and some of us may be rednecks. I'll leave the guesswork on sexual orientation and homophobia to others, heh heh heh... ;)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 130

Posts: 910/5128
EXP: 25600154
For next: 130492

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 1 day
#4 Posted on 17.8.02 1455.41
Reposted on: 17.8.09 1459.04
Ah, that clears things up a bit. Upon further review I probably should have posted this in the ole Site Bashing folder.
Jubuki
Kolbasz
Level: 47

Posts: 146/482
EXP: 722786
For next: 43423

Since: 16.7.02

Since last post: 4576 days
Last activity: 4559 days
#5 Posted on 19.8.02 1424.54
Reposted on: 19.8.09 1429.09
I'm all for taking whoever did come up with "IWC", much like "smark," and shooting them in the street like dogs.
DJ FrostyFreeze
Knackwurst
Level: 109

Posts: 515/3417
EXP: 13925168
For next: 34522

Since: 2.1.02
From: Hawthorne, CA

Since last post: 3 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#6 Posted on 19.8.02 1928.16
Reposted on: 19.8.09 1929.07
I dont have a problem with either term. If those pretty widely-used terms hadnt been introduced, I think we would've made up our own names to call those things by now anyway.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 104

Posts: 292/3042
EXP: 11556567
For next: 305598

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 29 days
Last activity: 19 days
AIM:  
#7 Posted on 19.8.02 1941.50
Reposted on: 19.8.09 1943.12
It's kind of a bulky pretentious term, but it's a hell of a lot easier to type than "people who enjoying reading about and discussing professional wrestling on the Internet".
SmooveK
Goetta
Level: 38

Posts: 292/308
EXP: 369958
For next: 492

Since: 27.6.02
From: Fukushima, Japan

Since last post: 3937 days
Last activity: 3626 days
#8 Posted on 19.8.02 2314.02
Reposted on: 19.8.09 2329.09
Whatever happened to "smarts"?

Wouldn't "people of the IWC" and "smart fans" be synonymous in this day and age?

-K
Slestak
Salami
Level: 32

Posts: 192/201
EXP: 198668
For next: 7776

Since: 2.1.02
From: Oklahoma City

Since last post: 4613 days
Last activity: 4547 days
#9 Posted on 20.8.02 0841.16
Reposted on: 20.8.09 0844.19

    Originally posted by SmooveK
    Whatever happened to "smarts"?

    Wouldn't "people of the IWC" and "smart fans" be synonymous in this day and age?

    -K

I don't think that's necessarily so. "Smarts" know about the inner workings of the wrestling business. The "IWC" is more about the exchange of opinions and ideas. So, the "IWC" is made up of "smarts", but not all "smarts" are a part of the IWC.

As for the term itself, I don't have any problem with it. It's just net shorthand. As OlFuzzyBastard said:

    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    It's kind of a bulky pretentious term, but it's a hell of a lot easier to type than "people who enjoying reading about and discussing professional wrestling on the Internet".
However I don't think it's pretentious. It's not like anyone wears it as a badge of honor.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Paintball !!
Next thread: Starting a new business
Previous thread: Molly Holly on whatsbetter.com
(3298 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Random - IWCRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.29 seconds.