The W
Views: 123845158
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
26.5.10 1753
The 7 - Random - IWC
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(3457 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (9 total)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 138

Posts: 906/5576
EXP: 31222512
For next: 440548

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#1 Posted on 17.8.02 0000.05
Reposted on: 17.8.09 0003.51
What the fuck is this shit? IWC? Yeah, I know what it stands for, but who thought this one up? I now see it popping up in threads and columns. Now when someone busts out a great flame or a ***** star point in a thread or column are we suppossed to start chanting I-W-C-I-W-C...! Who pioneered this anyway? Can I jump to the IWF? Why did *we* have to start this. We really are gay aren't we?
Promote this thread!
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 143

Posts: 281/6040
EXP: 35271902
For next: 559993

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 4 hours
#2 Posted on 17.8.02 0126.05
Reposted on: 17.8.09 0129.02
I dunno, man.
That's like asking who thought up the wheel!
That's not a question, but you should probably avoid chanting for anything you see on the internet.
You asked that already!
No.
WE didn't - only the people silly enough to lump everything into a group did blah blah blah blah
Sadly, yes.
FLRockAndLaw
Kishke
Level: 44

Posts: 146/404
EXP: 608932
For next: 2357

Since: 2.1.02
From: Central Florida, somewhere between Orlando and Tampa, U.S.A.

Since last post: 482 days
Last activity: 2 days
#3 Posted on 17.8.02 1127.31
Reposted on: 17.8.09 1129.01
To answer your questions further:
IWC - anagram for Internet Wrestling Community made up by marks and wrestling geeks and Net geeks.
Who thought it up? Scott Keith will probably lay claim to it, though John D. Williams may dispute that claim. No word from Jeff Amdur about any claim he might make for it...
Are we supposed to chant? Well, perhaps we should change it to Internet Community of Wrestling, so we could chant, "I-C-W!! I-C-W!!" It just rolls off the tongue better, you know? But for now, a "He's hardcore!" chant might be appropriate. But whatever you chant at the privacy of your own Net connection...
Who pioneered this? Asked and answered.
Can I jump to the IWF? Your contract with the IWC has a no-compete clause. So you're stuck for about another 14 months before you can make the jump.
Why did we have to start this? Ummmm... marks, wrestling geeks and Net geeks... what groups out there are more qualified to start it than us?
We really are gay? We're geeks, freaks, and some of us may be rednecks. I'll leave the guesswork on sexual orientation and homophobia to others, heh heh heh... ;)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 138

Posts: 910/5576
EXP: 31222512
For next: 440548

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 1 hour
#4 Posted on 17.8.02 1455.41
Reposted on: 17.8.09 1459.04
Ah, that clears things up a bit. Upon further review I probably should have posted this in the ole Site Bashing folder.
Jubuki
Kolbasz
Level: 48

Posts: 146/482
EXP: 779649
For next: 43899

Since: 16.7.02

Since last post: 5339 days
Last activity: 5322 days
#5 Posted on 19.8.02 1424.54
Reposted on: 19.8.09 1429.09
I'm all for taking whoever did come up with "IWC", much like "smark," and shooting them in the street like dogs.
DJ FrostyFreeze
Knackwurst
Level: 112

Posts: 515/3462
EXP: 15275134
For next: 63119

Since: 2.1.02
From: Hawthorne, CA

Since last post: 68 days
Last activity: 1 day
#6 Posted on 19.8.02 1928.16
Reposted on: 19.8.09 1929.07
I dont have a problem with either term. If those pretty widely-used terms hadnt been introduced, I think we would've made up our own names to call those things by now anyway.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 106

Posts: 292/3063
EXP: 12580294
For next: 91690

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 11 days
Last activity: 10 days
AIM:  
#7 Posted on 19.8.02 1941.50
Reposted on: 19.8.09 1943.12
It's kind of a bulky pretentious term, but it's a hell of a lot easier to type than "people who enjoying reading about and discussing professional wrestling on the Internet".
SmooveK
Goetta
Level: 39

Posts: 292/308
EXP: 398949
For next: 5826

Since: 27.6.02
From: Fukushima, Japan

Since last post: 4700 days
Last activity: 4389 days
#8 Posted on 19.8.02 2314.02
Reposted on: 19.8.09 2329.09
Whatever happened to "smarts"?

Wouldn't "people of the IWC" and "smart fans" be synonymous in this day and age?

-K
Slestak
Salami
Level: 33

Posts: 192/201
EXP: 213693
For next: 15489

Since: 2.1.02
From: Oklahoma City

Since last post: 5376 days
Last activity: 5309 days
#9 Posted on 20.8.02 0841.16
Reposted on: 20.8.09 0844.19

    Originally posted by SmooveK
    Whatever happened to "smarts"?

    Wouldn't "people of the IWC" and "smart fans" be synonymous in this day and age?

    -K

I don't think that's necessarily so. "Smarts" know about the inner workings of the wrestling business. The "IWC" is more about the exchange of opinions and ideas. So, the "IWC" is made up of "smarts", but not all "smarts" are a part of the IWC.

As for the term itself, I don't have any problem with it. It's just net shorthand. As OlFuzzyBastard said:

    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    It's kind of a bulky pretentious term, but it's a hell of a lot easier to type than "people who enjoying reading about and discussing professional wrestling on the Internet".
However I don't think it's pretentious. It's not like anyone wears it as a badge of honor.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Paintball !!
Next thread: Starting a new business
Previous thread: Molly Holly on whatsbetter.com
(3457 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Random - IWCRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.489 seconds.