The W
Views: 132046734
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
22.4.11 1720
The 7 - Random - IWC
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(3511 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (9 total)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 140

Posts: 906/5661
EXP: 32865707
For next: 420780

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 4 days
#1 Posted on 17.8.02 0000.05
Reposted on: 17.8.09 0003.51
What the fuck is this shit? IWC? Yeah, I know what it stands for, but who thought this one up? I now see it popping up in threads and columns. Now when someone busts out a great flame or a ***** star point in a thread or column are we suppossed to start chanting I-W-C-I-W-C...! Who pioneered this anyway? Can I jump to the IWF? Why did *we* have to start this. We really are gay aren't we?
Promote this thread!
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 145

Posts: 281/6159
EXP: 37368784
For next: 235388

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 1 day
#2 Posted on 17.8.02 0126.05
Reposted on: 17.8.09 0129.02
I dunno, man.
That's like asking who thought up the wheel!
That's not a question, but you should probably avoid chanting for anything you see on the internet.
You asked that already!
No.
WE didn't - only the people silly enough to lump everything into a group did blah blah blah blah
Sadly, yes.
FLRockAndLaw
Kishke
Level: 45

Posts: 146/404
EXP: 626596
For next: 33573

Since: 2.1.02
From: Central Florida, somewhere between Orlando and Tampa, U.S.A.

Since last post: 813 days
Last activity: 127 days
#3 Posted on 17.8.02 1127.31
Reposted on: 17.8.09 1129.01
To answer your questions further:
IWC - anagram for Internet Wrestling Community made up by marks and wrestling geeks and Net geeks.
Who thought it up? Scott Keith will probably lay claim to it, though John D. Williams may dispute that claim. No word from Jeff Amdur about any claim he might make for it...
Are we supposed to chant? Well, perhaps we should change it to Internet Community of Wrestling, so we could chant, "I-C-W!! I-C-W!!" It just rolls off the tongue better, you know? But for now, a "He's hardcore!" chant might be appropriate. But whatever you chant at the privacy of your own Net connection...
Who pioneered this? Asked and answered.
Can I jump to the IWF? Your contract with the IWC has a no-compete clause. So you're stuck for about another 14 months before you can make the jump.
Why did we have to start this? Ummmm... marks, wrestling geeks and Net geeks... what groups out there are more qualified to start it than us?
We really are gay? We're geeks, freaks, and some of us may be rednecks. I'll leave the guesswork on sexual orientation and homophobia to others, heh heh heh... ;)
BigDaddyLoco
Scrapple
Level: 140

Posts: 910/5661
EXP: 32865707
For next: 420780

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 4 days
#4 Posted on 17.8.02 1455.41
Reposted on: 17.8.09 1459.04
Ah, that clears things up a bit. Upon further review I probably should have posted this in the ole Site Bashing folder.
Jubuki
Kolbasz
Level: 48

Posts: 146/482
EXP: 803066
For next: 20482

Since: 16.7.02

Since last post: 5670 days
Last activity: 5653 days
#5 Posted on 19.8.02 1424.54
Reposted on: 19.8.09 1429.09
I'm all for taking whoever did come up with "IWC", much like "smark," and shooting them in the street like dogs.
DJ FrostyFreeze
Scrapple
Level: 113

Posts: 515/3464
EXP: 15731865
For next: 86744

Since: 2.1.02
From: Hawthorne, CA

Since last post: 98 days
Last activity: 12 min.
#6 Posted on 19.8.02 1928.16
Reposted on: 19.8.09 1929.07
I dont have a problem with either term. If those pretty widely-used terms hadnt been introduced, I think we would've made up our own names to call those things by now anyway.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 292/3063
EXP: 12952801
For next: 138552

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 342 days
Last activity: 318 days
AIM:  
#7 Posted on 19.8.02 1941.50
Reposted on: 19.8.09 1943.12
It's kind of a bulky pretentious term, but it's a hell of a lot easier to type than "people who enjoying reading about and discussing professional wrestling on the Internet".
SmooveK
Goetta
Level: 40

Posts: 292/308
EXP: 410891
For next: 30422

Since: 27.6.02
From: Fukushima, Japan

Since last post: 5031 days
Last activity: 4720 days
#8 Posted on 19.8.02 2314.02
Reposted on: 19.8.09 2329.09
Whatever happened to "smarts"?

Wouldn't "people of the IWC" and "smart fans" be synonymous in this day and age?

-K
Slestak
Salami
Level: 33

Posts: 192/201
EXP: 219892
For next: 9290

Since: 2.1.02
From: Oklahoma City

Since last post: 5707 days
Last activity: 5640 days
#9 Posted on 20.8.02 0841.16
Reposted on: 20.8.09 0844.19

    Originally posted by SmooveK
    Whatever happened to "smarts"?

    Wouldn't "people of the IWC" and "smart fans" be synonymous in this day and age?

    -K

I don't think that's necessarily so. "Smarts" know about the inner workings of the wrestling business. The "IWC" is more about the exchange of opinions and ideas. So, the "IWC" is made up of "smarts", but not all "smarts" are a part of the IWC.

As for the term itself, I don't have any problem with it. It's just net shorthand. As OlFuzzyBastard said:

    Originally posted by OlFuzzyBastard
    It's kind of a bulky pretentious term, but it's a hell of a lot easier to type than "people who enjoying reading about and discussing professional wrestling on the Internet".
However I don't think it's pretentious. It's not like anyone wears it as a badge of honor.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Paintball !!
Next thread: Starting a new business
Previous thread: Molly Holly on whatsbetter.com
(3511 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Random - IWCRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.841 seconds.