The W
Views: 144384880
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.7.12 0149
The 7 - Movies & TV - Titanic (in 3D)
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(127 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (6 total)
Oliver
Scrapple
Level: 134

Posts: 4391/5007
EXP: 27992961
For next: 594087

Since: 20.6.02

Since last post: 1605 days
Last activity: 1599 days
#1 Posted on 7.4.12 1713.32
Reposted on: 7.4.19 1714.06
A question my fiancée and I debated before catching the 3D rerelease of Titanic today: if this were George Lucas' movie, would the iceberg hit the ship first?

Anyhow, I can honestly say that the 3D adds very little to the experience. In fact, there were times I was convinced that the film was still in 2D.

I'm not afraid to admit that the movie still kicks my ass...I cried at the end of it. Still, ten or so years after seeing it for the first time.

I bet our friend JustinShapiro has a review on his site...but to be honest, its not worth the extra cost to see it in 3D.

(edited by Oliver on 7.4.12 2032)
Promote this thread!
Wpob
Bierwurst
Level: 88

Posts: 1429/1926
EXP: 6595432
For next: 55258

Since: 21.11.02
From: Williston Park, NY

Since last post: 12 days
Last activity: 1 day
#2 Posted on 8.4.12 0513.45
Reposted on: 8.4.19 0516.47
I saw Titanic with my wife when it came out and I enjoyed but for the big screen experience but always thought it was overrated. Outside of the chemistry between DiCaprio and Winslet, the movie was blah up until the ship sank. I have never seen it again and would certainly never spend money to see it in 3D.

Another film I feel the same way about - Avatar. A weak script and mediocre acting saved only by spectacular special effects. Saw it in the theater and would never watch it again.
spf
Scrapple
Level: 139

Posts: 5264/5410
EXP: 31861454
For next: 606073

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 1360 days
Last activity: 235 days
#3 Posted on 9.4.12 1058.46
Reposted on: 9.4.19 1059.01
Using the Cerebus method of scoring movie quality, this is the second best movie ever made.
Cerebus
Scrapple
Level: 115

Posts: 3168/3558
EXP: 16565171
For next: 246244

Since: 17.11.02

Since last post: 751 days
Last activity: 473 days
#4 Posted on 11.4.12 1058.46
Reposted on: 11.4.19 1059.03
    Originally posted by spf
    Using the Cerebus method of scoring movie quality, this is the second best movie ever made.


My point is that all these 'Best Of...' lists are highly subjective. I got more enjoyment from watching Raise The Titanic than this film. Titanic bored me up until it hit the iceberg. My favorite scene was watching people fall and hit the railings.

Anyways, everyone knows Citizen Kane was the second best movie ever made.

This is the first 3D release I'm skipping. I would only see this again if they used the MST3K audio track.
J. Kyle
Banger
Level: 100

Posts: 2316/2550
EXP: 10270402
For next: 84030

Since: 21.2.02
From: The Land of Aloha

Since last post: 374 days
Last activity: 357 days
Y!:
#5 Posted on 11.4.12 1248.38
Reposted on: 11.4.19 1249.07
    Originally posted by Cerebus
    Anyways, everyone knows Citizen Kane was the second best movie ever made.
After The Empire Strikes Back?
Cerebus
Scrapple
Level: 115

Posts: 3169/3558
EXP: 16565171
For next: 246244

Since: 17.11.02

Since last post: 751 days
Last activity: 473 days
#6 Posted on 11.4.12 1526.14
Reposted on: 11.4.19 1527.41
    Originally posted by J. Kyle
      Originally posted by Cerebus
      Anyways, everyone knows Citizen Kane was the second best movie ever made.
    After The Empire Strikes Back?


Personally, I'd say after Lawrence of Arabia, but ESB is in my top 20.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: New season thus far
Next thread: New DVDs coming out 4/10/12 (279)
Previous thread: Game of Thrones 2x2 - "The Night Lands"
(127 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Movies & TV - Titanic (in 3D)Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2019 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.122 seconds.