Since last post: 4727 days Last activity: 4669 days
#1 Posted on 11.7.02 0922.12 Reposted on: 11.7.09 0922.15
I can understand grading wrestlers for their performances and such so far this year, but surely when it comes to grading the bookers, it comes down to a lot of hearsay and speculation. It seems a little off to be judging people on this 'evidence'.
#2 Posted on 11.7.02 1054.18 Reposted on: 11.7.09 1059.03
411 have their own message board, by the way.
CajunMan Boudin blanc No longer registered Level: 97
Posts: 599/2483 EXP: 9200955 For next: 116403
Since: 2.1.02 From: Give me a Title shot!
Since last post: 1953 days Last activity: 1090 days
#3 Posted on 11.7.02 1339.19 Reposted on: 11.7.09 1340.30
Originally posted by A-MOLI can understand grading wrestlers for their performances and such so far this year, but surely when it comes to grading the bookers, it comes down to a lot of hearsay and speculation. It seems a little off to be judging people on this 'evidence'.
Actually I believe they were right on the mark. Are you happy with the quality booking you have seen in the WWE this year?
I agree with A-wol, he didn't give a link but 411. But they graded individual bookers not the booking as a whole. I am smarky in many ways (I'll admit it) but one thing I still can't do is act like I *know* who booked what.
Something as simple as the women division, who booked Trish/Jazz pretty good stuff, really helped both women. Molly/Trish fat ass angle pretty stupid and actually hurt both girls. I have no idea if it's the same person or differnt people all I know one I enjoyed the other I didn't.
I liked what was booked with IC title RVD/Eddie/Brock recently I don't like the tag with Rikishi/ Billy/ Chuck/ Rico.
All I do know is whoever booked the World title match at WRestleMania with HHH vs. STephanie errr Jericho. Should have his or her mouth glued shut and a typewriter dropped on his/her hands
(edited by Net Hack Slasher on 11.7.02 2157)
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE