The W
Views: 128185032
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.9.10 1245
The 7 - Football - Trust to take Reggie Bush's Heisman Register and log in to post!
(9 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (12 total)
CajunMan
Boudin blanc
No longer registered
Level: 98

Posts: 2246/2483
EXP: 9376910
For next: 277477

Since: 2.1.02
From: Give me a Title shot!

Since last post: 2166 days
Last activity: 1303 days
#1 Posted on 7.9.10 1434.57
Reposted on: 7.9.17 1435.31
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/news?slug=ys-bushheisman090710

I think this kind of sucks that they are going to penalize him like this, What is next? Will they take away S.C.'s national championships too? Just pretend it never happened?
Promote this thread!
The Game
Boudin rouge
Level: 45

Posts: 368/501
EXP: 620748
For next: 39421

Since: 5.5.09

Since last post: 1448 days
Last activity: 1448 days
#2 Posted on 7.9.10 1439.57
Reposted on: 7.9.17 1440.18
I think if they are soon to take away Bush's Heisman and did put some really stiff penalties on USC's program, taking away their championships will probably be inevitable.

In relation to USC and what will probably happen to their championships, like Triple H said, "It never happened".

(edited by The Game on 7.9.10 1440)
It's False
Scrapple
Level: 144

Posts: 3862/6153
EXP: 36036708
For next: 673686

Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 396 days
Last activity: 185 days
#3 Posted on 7.9.10 1443.54
Reposted on: 7.9.17 1444.07
I understand penalizing USC because they turned a blind eye while Bush took illegal benefits. But what I don't understand is that the Heisman is supposed to be a performance-based award. Nothing Bush did enhanced his performance on the field, so how is taking this award away from him fair?

And this question is coming from an admitted USC-hater who would love to see Lane Kiffin sent out of town on a rail.
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 144

Posts: 3253/6088
EXP: 36072967
For next: 637427

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 48 min.
#4 Posted on 7.9.10 1506.45
Reposted on: 7.9.17 1514.10
This is how the Heisman Trust describes their award


    The outstanding college football player whose performance best exhibits the pursuit of excellence with integrity.


They didn't bold it, but they probably would when explaining why they're taking the award back.
spf
Scrapple
Level: 137

Posts: 4980/5410
EXP: 30157138
For next: 715795

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 693 days
Last activity: 112 days
AIM:  
#5 Posted on 7.9.10 1640.32
Reposted on: 7.9.17 1643.12
    Originally posted by It's False
    I understand penalizing USC because they turned a blind eye while Bush took illegal benefits. But what I don't understand is that the Heisman is supposed to be a performance-based award. Nothing Bush did enhanced his performance on the field, so how is taking this award away from him fair?

    And this question is coming from an admitted USC-hater who would love to see Lane Kiffin sent out of town on a rail.

If he was an ineligible player, then you have to say that he can't be awarded for anything he did would be my guess. Kind of like if Peyton Manning put on a fake mustache and went back to UT for a season and put up huge numbers, won the Heisman, then revealed his ruse.
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator
Level: 135

Posts: 4463/5283
EXP: 29102055
For next: 233026

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 129 days
Last activity: 71 days
#6 Posted on 7.9.10 1715.31
Reposted on: 7.9.17 1716.57
    Originally posted by spf
      Originally posted by It's False
      I understand penalizing USC because they turned a blind eye while Bush took illegal benefits. But what I don't understand is that the Heisman is supposed to be a performance-based award. Nothing Bush did enhanced his performance on the field, so how is taking this award away from him fair?

      And this question is coming from an admitted USC-hater who would love to see Lane Kiffin sent out of town on a rail.

    If he was an ineligible player, then you have to say that he can't be awarded for anything he did would be my guess. Kind of like if Peyton Manning put on a fake mustache and went back to UT for a season and put up huge numbers, won the Heisman, then revealed his ruse.


Emphasis mine in your quote. He was ineligible, which is why USC has to vacate every game he played and since he was ineligible, he couldn't even be in the running for the Heisman.
StingArmy
Andouille
Level: 90

Posts: 1726/2118
EXP: 7068113
For next: 120523

Since: 3.5.03
From: Georgia bred, you can tell by my Hawk jersey

Since last post: 580 days
Last activity: 48 days
#7 Posted on 7.9.10 2041.31
Reposted on: 7.9.17 2056.30
Today on Around the Horn Woody Paige quoted (or maybe just paraphrased?) the Heisman guidelines that stated the Heisman winner had to be a college-eligible athlete.

- StingArmy
supersalvadoran
Sujuk
Level: 61

Posts: 651/996
EXP: 1871645
For next: 4962

Since: 10.1.08
From: westbury, new york

Since last post: 373 days
Last activity: 78 days
#8 Posted on 8.9.10 0022.08
Reposted on: 8.9.17 0023.22
    Originally posted by thecubsfan
    This is how the Heisman Trust describes their award


      The outstanding college football player whose performance best exhibits the pursuit of excellence with integrity.


    They didn't bold it, but they probably would when explaining why they're taking the award back.


And that's the problem I have with this. I'm not defending Reggie Bush; he does deserve to be punished in some way for his actions. But does he deserve a stiffer punishment than say, one OJ Simpson? Simpson (who let's forget if he did murder Nicole Brown and Robert Goldman, still was involved in numberous legal problems afterward and was convicted of robbery and kidnapping, gets to keep his while Bush has his taken away? If the trust has worries with Bush threatening the integrity of the trophy, shouldn't they had even bigger worries with OJ? What makes them act so harsh towards Bush that he's likely to be the 1st one to lose his trophy instead of Simpson?
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator
Level: 135

Posts: 4465/5283
EXP: 29102055
For next: 233026

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 129 days
Last activity: 71 days
#9 Posted on 8.9.10 0024.37
Reposted on: 8.9.17 0029.01
    Originally posted by supersalvadoran


    And that's the problem I have with this. I'm not defending Reggie Bush; he does deserve to be punished in some way for his actions. But does he deserve a stiffer punishment than say, one OJ Simpson? Simpson (who let's forget if he did murder Nicole Brown and Robert Goldman, still was involved in numberous legal problems afterward and was convicted of robbery and kidnapping, gets to keep his while Bush has his taken away? If the trust has worries with Bush threatening the integrity of the trophy, shouldn't they had even bigger worries with OJ? What makes them act so harsh towards Bush that he's likely to be the 1st one to lose his trophy instead of Simpson?


OJ never lost his eligibility. I get what you're saying, about his off the field stuff, but he was still eligible to play the year he got his trophy.
ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 139

Posts: 4093/5597
EXP: 31708625
For next: 758902

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 1 day
#10 Posted on 9.9.10 1906.36
Reposted on: 9.9.17 1909.42
I'm sure Reggie Bush will cry about this all the way to his next (massive) payday.
RyanAnderson's3PtMagic
Tocino
Banned
Level: 17

Posts: 4/62
EXP: 24740
For next: 3

Since: 13.9.10
From: DC

Since last post: 1873 days
Last activity: 1860 days
#11 Posted on 13.9.10 0838.37
Reposted on: 13.9.17 0842.52
    Originally posted by ekedolphin
    I'm sure Reggie Bush will cry about this all the way to his next (massive) payday.


hee hee I rea this as next massive playboy, like the girls he dates, anyways as a big USC fan I think it is unfair kinda; yes we cheated but who doesn't
Ryan72182
Tocino
Level: 18

Posts: 40/61
EXP: 25250
For next: 4648

Since: 15.1.10

Since last post: 2521 days
Last activity: 2507 days
#12 Posted on 13.9.10 1515.16
Reposted on: 13.9.17 1516.31
You got caught. That's the difference. It's like the old saying: "Win if you can, lose if you must but always cheat"



.....especially against Alabama. Fuck them.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: 2010 Week 2
Next thread: The W Survival League: version 2010.0 (Week 1)
Previous thread: 2010 NFL point spread league
(9 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: SAINTS ARE SUPERBOWL CHAMPS!! - Who Dat! - Jeremy Shockey rushed to hospital - More...
The 7 - Football - Trust to take Reggie Bush's HeismanRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.303 seconds.