The W
Views: 128168182
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.9.10 0926
The 7 - Movies & TV - Meet Your New Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man Register and log in to post!
(88 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (12 total)
John Orquiola
Scrapple
Level: 126

Posts: 1415/4479
EXP: 22603453
For next: 480714

Since: 28.2.02
From: Boston

Since last post: 1182 days
Last activity: 1182 days
#1 Posted on 1.7.10 1909.07
Reposted on: 1.7.17 1909.17
Sony Pictures' official Twitter:

@SonyPictures BREAKING NEWS: ANDREW GARFIELD CAST AS PETER PARKER IN NEXT SPIDER-MAN

http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/103264-its-official-andrew-garfield-to-play-spider-man

Who is Andrew Garfield? I'm not quite sure. IMDB:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1940449/

I've seen a couple of movies he's been in but I don't immedately recall him, not even from the most recent movie of his I've seen, The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus.

In a way, I envy him, but in an even more accurate way, I kind of don't. He's got Tobey Maguire's megapopular shoes to fill. He'll need all the help he can get to win audiences over. And so will Marc Webb's movie in general.
Promote this thread!
It's False
Scrapple
Level: 144

Posts: 3708/6153
EXP: 36033029
For next: 677365

Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 395 days
Last activity: 184 days
#2 Posted on 1.7.10 1921.30
Reposted on: 1.7.17 1921.30
He's an unknown and he looks the part, so he's got that going for him. It's going to take A LOT to overcome the inanity of rebooting a franchise that didn't need rebooting, so this kid's got a major uphill battle ahead of him.
lotjx
Scrapple
Level: 119

Posts: 820/4695
EXP: 18493164
For next: 436182

Since: 5.9.08

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 11 hours
#3 Posted on 1.7.10 1922.37
Reposted on: 1.7.17 1923.26
According to IMBD he was in a Doctor Who Dalek two parter back in 2007. I remember that episode and he was just ok in it. I could complain about a 27 year old playing a 16 year old Peter Parker, but thats rather pointless. I also agree its going to be hard to top Maquire since it was only a few years ago Spiderman 3 came out. I am sure it will make money, but the rumored scripts of either Moribus aka the Twilight script or rehashing Spidey 1 with the Osborns are not something I want to see. As much I love Spidey, the comics have made me lose a lot of love for it as well as defending Spidey 3. I'll see it as a matinee.

(edited by lotjx on 1.7.10 1924)
djp
Morcilla
Level: 52

Posts: 502/649
EXP: 1028747
For next: 55101

Since: 16.2.07
From: 3rd Floor, NW window

Since last post: 255 days
Last activity: 159 days
#4 Posted on 1.7.10 1956.51
Reposted on: 1.7.17 1957.02
Man it is way too soon for a rehash of Spiderman. It's like a remake of Avatar hitting theatres this fall. I don't have high hopes as I can see a lot of strange twists trying to keep it fresh and separate from the Maguire franchise. Unless they actually veer away from the special effects and try a more realisic approach, which would be welcomed.
John Orquiola
Scrapple
Level: 126

Posts: 1416/4479
EXP: 22603453
For next: 480714

Since: 28.2.02
From: Boston

Since last post: 1182 days
Last activity: 1182 days
#5 Posted on 1.7.10 2000.26
Reposted on: 1.7.17 2000.44
    Originally posted by djp
    Man it is way too soon for a rehash of Spiderman. It's like a remake of Avatar hitting theatres this fall.


Not really. Spider-Man 3 came out May, 2007. When Marc Webb's Spider-Man arrives in theaters it will have been a little over five years. Batman Begins rebooted 8 years after Batman and Robin.

Perhaps 5 years may be too soon for people to be ready for a new Spider-Man considering how popular the Sam Raimi/Maguire movies were from 2002-2007 (even 3, which was huge at the box office even if it creatively disappointed.) But we'll know that for sure two years from now.
djp
Morcilla
Level: 52

Posts: 503/649
EXP: 1028747
For next: 55101

Since: 16.2.07
From: 3rd Floor, NW window

Since last post: 255 days
Last activity: 159 days
#6 Posted on 1.7.10 2034.21
Reposted on: 1.7.17 2034.39
    Originally posted by John Orquiola
    Perhaps 5 years may be too soon for people to be ready for a new Spider-Man considering how popular the Sam Raimi/Maguire movies were from 2002-2007 (even 3, which was huge at the box office even if it creatively disappointed.) But we'll know that for sure two years from now.


That's probably what I meant. After people saw Batman & Robin , they were *ready* for a new direction. I think the vast majority of Spidey fans would rather see more of the Raimi/Maguire films as opposed to a new start. Not a lot more, but at least one more would have been good.
SchippeWreck
Banger
Level: 103

Posts: 1849/2861
EXP: 11135325
For next: 336120

Since: 26.3.03
From: Glendale, CA

Since last post: 122 days
Last activity: 42 days
#7 Posted on 1.7.10 2249.47
Reposted on: 1.7.17 2250.23
    Originally posted by djp
      Originally posted by John Orquiola
      Perhaps 5 years may be too soon for people to be ready for a new Spider-Man considering how popular the Sam Raimi/Maguire movies were from 2002-2007 (even 3, which was huge at the box office even if it creatively disappointed.) But we'll know that for sure two years from now.


    That's probably what I meant. After people saw Batman & Robin , they were *ready* for a new direction. I think the vast majority of Spidey fans would rather see more of the Raimi/Maguire films as opposed to a new start. Not a lot more, but at least one more would have been good.

Well, I'm the vocal minority, then. Spider-Man 3 made me retroactively hate the other two. I want the Raimi Spider-Man franchise killed with fire. Bring on the reboot.
Big Bad
Scrapple
Level: 153

Posts: 5505/7032
EXP: 44681162
For next: 642345

Since: 4.1.02
From: Dorchester, Ontario

Since last post: 33 days
Last activity: 1 day
#8 Posted on 2.7.10 0103.20
Reposted on: 2.7.17 0103.20
While I agree that SM3 wasn't too impressive, and even SM1 was no great shakes, Spider-Man 2 was pretty much as good a comic-book movie as you'll get. It was so great that I would've loved to have seen what Raimi and company could've done with another film, especially one without studio interference (coughcoughnoVenomcough). I liked 500 Days Of Summer, but I have more way confidence in Raimi than I do in Marc Webb.

Ironic that Morbius might be the next villain, given that Raimi apparently wanted to use him for SM3 at one point but the studio wanted Venom instead.
Amos Cochran
Lap cheong
Level: 73

Posts: 250/1568
EXP: 3371282
For next: 114603

Since: 28.8.09

Since last post: 997 days
Last activity: 997 days
#9 Posted on 2.7.10 0430.03
Reposted on: 2.7.17 0430.23
Rumoured guys for the villain are Clive Owen and JohN Turturro. I don't think it's Morbius.

Also, Garfield is a FANTASTIC actor. Better than Maguire, probably.
dMp
Knackwurst
Level: 105

Posts: 2031/2917
EXP: 11936992
For next: 325308

Since: 4.1.02
From: The Hague, Netherlands (Europe)

Since last post: 9 days
Last activity: 16 hours
#10 Posted on 2.7.10 0517.11
Reposted on: 2.7.17 0517.17
Are they still going with the Ultimate universe?
Than I wouldn't mind the Osborns/Goblin so much I think.

But obviously what they should do is just gloss over the first few stories there and find something new.
We do remember the spider-bite. No matter if it was radio-active, genetically altered or magical.

The actor is 27? Wouldn't have guessed.
He does look the part.
OlFuzzyBastard
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 2939/3063
EXP: 12716215
For next: 375138

Since: 28.4.02
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 130 days
Last activity: 107 days
AIM:  
#11 Posted on 2.7.10 0958.34
Reposted on: 2.7.17 0958.55
Any chance he can be funny? I liked the Raimi films - I also rank Spider-Man 2 as the best super hero comic book movie that doesn't have "dark" or "knight" in the title - but I never got why he made Spidey so morose and whiny. Spider-Man is supposed to have 8,000 quips a fight. (That's kinda why I was down with the twitter campaign for Donald Glover, even with the inevitable shitstorm casting a (*gasp*) black Peter Parker would have brought.)
Amos Cochran
Lap cheong
Level: 73

Posts: 254/1568
EXP: 3371282
For next: 114603

Since: 28.8.09

Since last post: 997 days
Last activity: 997 days
#12 Posted on 2.7.10 1024.19
Reposted on: 2.7.17 1024.45
I always thought Tobey's Parker was funny, just in a more goofy/slapstick way. Morose and whiny seems a bit harsh.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: NEW ON DVD 6/29/10: 369 releases coming out Tuesday
Next thread: Toy Story 3
Previous thread: Futurama 6x3: Attack of the Killer App
(88 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Space Battleship Yamato! - Best and Worst of the Summer - The Human Centipede - More...
The 7 - Movies & TV - Meet Your New Friendly Neighborhood Spider-ManRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.269 seconds.