The W
Views: 132016156
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
21.4.11 1622
The 7 - Site Bashing - A gem from Mallory Mahling
This thread has 3 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(472 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (8 total)
vsp
Andouille
Level: 90

Posts: 319/2042
EXP: 7119030
For next: 69606

Since: 3.1.02
From: Philly

Since last post: 4310 days
Last activity: 565 days
#1 Posted on 25.6.02 0929.45
Reposted on: 25.6.09 0934.39
Normally, I try to stay out of site bashing -- if I find a contributor ridiculous, inane or obnoxious, I just avoid him or her. But I have yet to figure out exactly what qualifies Mallory Mahling to produce her "alternative perspective" Raw report each week for the Torch -- apparently, "alternative" is a euphemism for "rarely informed." Her breezy take on the night's events is guaranteed to produce at least one howler every week, which is why I still glance at it now and then.

This week's highlight, reproduced without further comment:



    (5) He's coming, teased an ad for a "mysterious" masked wrestler. Who? Well, as unpredictable as the last couple of weeks have been, it could be almost anybody, including Bret Hart.



Promote this thread!
TheBucsFan
TheChiefsFan
Level: 113

Posts: 1033/3428
EXP: 15486043
For next: 332566

Since: 2.1.02

Since last post: 1348 days
Last activity: 1348 days
#2 Posted on 25.6.02 0934.33
Reposted on: 25.6.09 0940.46
Call it a hunch, but I don't think she was serious. It was just a jab at the WWE writing team.
Torchslasher
Knackwurst
Level: 111

Posts: 134/3334
EXP: 14834526
For next: 33880

Since: 17.1.02
From: New F'n Jersey

Since last post: 40 days
Last activity: 40 days
#3 Posted on 25.6.02 1252.22
Reposted on: 25.6.09 1259.01
No, she probably is that oblivious.

I enjoy the Torch site and subscribe to the newsletter, but I make sure to skip her inane Raw reports. I am surprised that Keller puts up with her (then again, he gives space to that blowhard BJ Bethel, so I guess I am not TOO surprised).
Zeruel
Thirty Millionth Hit
Moderator
Level: 136

Posts: 461/5283
EXP: 29627161
For next: 469831

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Silver Spring in the Land of Mary.

Since last post: 338 days
Last activity: 280 days
#4 Posted on 25.6.02 1332.07
Reposted on: 25.6.09 1348.10

    Originally posted by Torchslasher
    No, she probably is that oblivious.

    I enjoy the Torch site and subscribe to the newsletter, but I make sure to skip her inane Raw reports. I am surprised that Keller puts up with her (then again, he gives space to that blowhard BJ Bethel, so I guess I am not TOO surprised).



haven't parents learned yet that they can not name their kids BJ w/o leaving them open to jokes?

I've snickered at every BJ I've been introduced to.

um...that might have been the oddest statement that I have ever said/typed
Derek Burgan
Longanisa
Level: 15

Posts: 19/34
EXP: 15269
For next: 1115

Since: 23.1.02
From: New Hampshire

Since last post: 5688 days
Last activity: 5663 days
#5 Posted on 25.6.02 2042.07
Reposted on: 25.6.09 2055.15
I think Mallory's take on RAW are pretty decent, if only becuase they are at least a little different than the other 100 recaps you can read on the net. Who needs another CRZ when no one can come close to being as good as CRZ is at recapping (in his style) in the first place? Judging by her sarcastic remarks from other columns, I think it's safe to assume that the line about Bret Hart was made in jest.

What I have issue with is Bruce Mitchell, the guy who constantly tears the WWE for not doing anything long term, recapping a show in which he comments on things as-they-occur. I think it is part of a larger issue of cynacism that I'll be touching upon in my Smackdown recap this week. Don't get me wrong, the stream of concisousness thing is a good idea, but not for him.
A-MOL
Frankfurter
Level: 59

Posts: 2/777
EXP: 1646407
For next: 26731

Since: 26.6.02
From: York, England

Since last post: 5150 days
Last activity: 5092 days
#6 Posted on 26.6.02 0557.10
Reposted on: 26.6.09 0558.52
She must not have got the memo that all Torch staff had to declare that Monday night was the 'Worst Raw Yet'. Describing it as 'entertaining' is really going against the party line.
Co-Co-Nut
Loukanika
Level: 8

Posts: 3/8
EXP: 1722
For next: 465

Since: 11.6.02
From: Isle of Fiji

Since last post: 5646 days
Last activity: 5616 days
#7 Posted on 28.6.02 1324.47
Reposted on: 28.6.09 1329.02
I don't mind her reports at all, if only because they are generally more positive than most you'll find on the Net, and it's a nice change of pace, especially for someone like me who is more of a fan than a smart.
Scott Summets
Sujuk
Level: 66

Posts: 26/1008
EXP: 2432522
For next: 29342

Since: 27.6.02

Since last post: 5182 days
Last activity: 5150 days
#8 Posted on 2.7.02 1052.50
Reposted on: 2.7.09 1059.02
If you want a great quote from the article this week, "Plus they keep headlining the Tough Enough kids at the expense of the veteran wrestlers in the back. " So.... having a fresh face in Chris Nowinski beat a washed up Bradshaw is bad? She makes it seem like Maven and Chris squashed Angle and Rock.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: slayed (not slashed)
Next thread: www.billgoldberg.com
Previous thread: Hyatte vs. Keith
(472 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Site Bashing - A gem from Mallory Mahling Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2018 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.226 seconds.