Texas Kelly
Lap cheong Level: 83
Posts: 952/1528 EXP: 5382172 For next: 50072
Since: 3.1.02 From: FOREST HILLS CONTROLS THE UNIVERSE
Since last post: 2368 days Last activity: 1529 days
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #1 Posted on 22.12.06 1815.25 Reposted on: 22.12.13 1815.42 | New set-up would keep teams closer to home (sports.espn.go.com)
The NHL has floated the idea of realigning its six current divisions into four, mainly aligned with time zones, according to a story on TSN of Canada's Web site.
According to the report, six club executives met with NHL commissioner Gary Bettman this week to consider potential plans. They're taking ideas from those talks back to their teams, TSN reported.
In other words, nothing's set in stone yet.
Here's what it would essentially boil down to:- One eight-team and one seven-team division in each conference.
- Top two teams in each divisions would be locked into #1-#4 seeds, with the rest determined by points.
- The Northeast (Canadiens, Senators, Maple Leafs, Sabres, Bruins) would remain intact and be joined by the Penguins and one of the Southeast teams (my guess would be the Capitals since they would be the closest travel-wise).
- The other Eastern division would include the New York-area teams (Rangers, Islanders, Devils), the Flyers, and the other four Southeast teams (Thrashers, Hurricanes, Lightning, Panthers).
- One Western division would include all teams in Pacific or Mountain time zones (Canucks, Flames, Oilers, Ducks, Kings, Sharks, Avalanche & Coyotes).
- The other Western division would include all Western teams in Central or Eastern time zones - this would include the Central (Predators, Red Wings, Blackhawks, Blue Jackets, Blues) plus the Wild and the Stars.
It doesn't sound like such a bad idea to me - the only major rivalry that would really be broken up under this plan would be Flyers/Penguins, and even then, that might get destroyed anyway if the arena situation in Pittsburgh doesn't work itself out somehow. (And if the Kansas City rumors turn into actual action, then you just swap 'em with Columbus and you're none the wiser geographically, if totally sporting a big hole tradition-wise for the short term).
This also gives the NHL the opportunity to schedule fewer inter-conference matchups (there are too many of them now, IMO), and gives you two obvious openings for future expansion should the league ever get its act together financially.
What's everyone else's take on this? Promote this thread! | | kwik
Summer sausage Level: 49
Posts: 84/445 EXP: 833015 For next: 50874
Since: 5.9.02 From: Norwich, NY
Since last post: 2955 days Last activity: 2935 days
| #2 Posted on 22.12.06 2136.24 Reposted on: 22.12.13 2137.41 | Originally posted by Texas Kelly New set-up would keep teams closer to home (sports.espn.go.com)
The NHL has floated the idea of realigning its six current divisions into four, mainly aligned with time zones, according to a story on TSN of Canada's Web site.
According to the report, six club executives met with NHL commissioner Gary Bettman this week to consider potential plans. They're taking ideas from those talks back to their teams, TSN reported.
In other words, nothing's set in stone yet.
Here's what it would essentially boil down to:- One eight-team and one seven-team division in each conference.
- Top two teams in each divisions would be locked into #1-#4 seeds, with the rest determined by points.
- The Northeast (Canadiens, Senators, Maple Leafs, Sabres, Bruins) would remain intact and be joined by the Penguins and one of the Southeast teams (my guess would be the Capitals since they would be the closest travel-wise).
- The other Eastern division would include the New York-area teams (Rangers, Islanders, Devils), the Flyers, and the other four Southeast teams (Thrashers, Hurricanes, Lightning, Panthers).
- One Western division would include all teams in Pacific or Mountain time zones (Canucks, Flames, Oilers, Ducks, Kings, Sharks, Avalanche & Coyotes).
- The other Western division would include all Western teams in Central or Eastern time zones - this would include the Central (Predators, Red Wings, Blackhawks, Blue Jackets, Blues) plus the Wild and the Stars.
It doesn't sound like such a bad idea to me - the only major rivalry that would really be broken up under this plan would be Flyers/Penguins, and even then, that might get destroyed anyway if the arena situation in Pittsburgh doesn't work itself out somehow. (And if the Kansas City rumors turn into actual action, then you just swap 'em with Columbus and you're none the wiser geographically, if totally sporting a big hole tradition-wise for the short term).
This also gives the NHL the opportunity to schedule fewer inter-conference matchups (there are too many of them now, IMO), and gives you two obvious openings for future expansion should the league ever get its act together financially.
What's everyone else's take on this?
Going by the TSN article (http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=189350&hubname=), Atlanta and Columbus would flip conferences. So, if I'm reading it right, here's what the alignment would look like:
East Conference
North Division Toronto Montreal Ottawa Boston Buffalo Pittsburgh Columbus
South Divison NY Rangers NY Islanders New Jersey Washington Tampa Bay Florida Carolina Philadelphia
West Conference
Central Divison Detroit Chicago St. Louis Minnesota Dallas Atlanta Nashville
West Division Vancouver Calgary Edmonton Los Angeles San Jose Anaheim Phoenix Colorado
The schedule would break out to 6 games against divisional opponents, 3 or 4 games against the other division in the conference, and 1 game against the opposing conference
20 teams need to support the proposal for it to take effect.
It looks fine to me, though I don't know why you flip Atlanta and Columbus, taking Atlanta away from the Florida teams.
(edited by kwik on 22.12.06 2243) | JayJayDean
Scrapple Level: 136
Posts: 2865/4750 EXP: 29501192 For next: 595800
Since: 2.1.02 From: Seattle, WA
Since last post: 2984 days Last activity: 2562 days
| | Y!: | |
|
| #3 Posted on 22.12.06 2310.00 Reposted on: 22.12.13 2310.43 | I think they should just have two fifteen-team conferences. They might as well be different if they are going to change it up, and they could manage the travel if they decided to make it a priority. | ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE |
| | | |