The W
Views: 95786673
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
24.4.07 1426
The 7 - Baseball - Mr. Kearns go to Washington, Ponson to Yanks Register and log in to post!
(101 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (12 total)
edoug
Summer sausage
Level: 43

Posts: 174/429
EXP: 542198
For next: 22853

Since: 13.2.04
From: Maine

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 7 hours
#1 Posted on 13.7.06 1600.58
Reposted on: 13.7.13 1601.34
Austin kearns to Wash.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2518314

Aren't the Reds still in the race. Really can't understand the reasons for this one.

Ponson to New York
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2518391

Ponson will fold like a tent in the Bronx.



Promote this thread!
Brian P. Dermody
Liverwurst
Moderator
Level: 68

Posts: 976/1205
EXP: 2721781
For next: 7033

Since: 20.9.02
From: New York, NY

Since last post: 755 days
Last activity: 178 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 13.7.06 1613.42
Reposted on: 13.7.13 1614.28
Ponson had best consider ritual suicide at this point. He's going to go to pieces so fast that Jeff Weaver will look like Andy Pettitte by comparison.

Is this Steinbrenner's way of getting the heat off A-Rod?
Quezzy
Knackwurst
Level: 105

Posts: 2091/3181
EXP: 12022810
For next: 239490

Since: 6.1.02
From: The Moon

Since last post: 4 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
#3 Posted on 13.7.06 1630.54
Reposted on: 13.7.13 1631.14
A lot of people are saying that the Yanks are finally going to miss the playoffs this year, but the Red Sox needed that streak where they were awesome to move ahead of the Yanks, who have one good starter and half their offense injured, by just three games. I think it's a lot of wishful thinking, it won't take a lot for the Yankees to get back in first. So I don't think it's a bad move to get Ponson, they didn't have to give up anyone and they're the Yankees, they have limitless amount of money. Sure Ponson may suck, but last year they did the same thing picking up crappy pitchers throwing them out there and seeing what sticks. It worked last year so why not try it again.

drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 115

Posts: 2901/3934
EXP: 16339310
For next: 472105

Since: 22.4.02
From: Connecticut

Since last post: 27 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 13.7.06 1804.10
Reposted on: 13.7.13 1805.08
Any word on the ATF raiding Krivsky's office? I mean, ye gods, you don't give up Kearns and Lopez for league-average pitchers. I think they seriously think that's the kind of move they need to make to make the playoffs. Cincinnati, I'm sorry about your front office.
It's False
Scrapple
Level: 137

Posts: 1573/5976
EXP: 30384544
For next: 488389

Since: 20.6.02
From: I am the Tag Team Champions!

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 5 days
#5 Posted on 13.7.06 1806.29
Reposted on: 13.7.13 1807.24
I know the Yankees have it bad with Pavano on the shelf and Johnson past his prime, but do they really think Ponson is the answer? I would have taken my chances on bringing up one of the prospects, especially in light of Jonathan Palpelbon's success in Boston.

And am I the only one who thinks (or maybe hopes) that somehow Toronto will steal the division?
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 151

Posts: 5219/7534
EXP: 42842724
For next: 453852

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 297 days
Last activity: 297 days
#6 Posted on 13.7.06 2039.50
Reposted on: 13.7.13 2040.07
    Originally posted by It's False
    And am I the only one who thinks (or maybe hopes) that somehow Toronto will steal the division?









If the division and/or Wild Card was in the 88-90 win range, I could see Toronto getting in. Looking at the numbers at the break though, it looks like it will take at least 95-96 wins to get the AL East and the Wild Card might actually be 96-97 wins. To get to 95, Toronto has to go 18 over after the break, while Boston would have to go 8 over during that time period and the Yankees 14 over to reach 95.
As for Ponson with the Yankees: This has a better chance of turning into Kevin Brown at the end or the Esteban Loiza Yankee fiasco rather than the Small/Chacon lightning in a bottle they caught last summer.

(edited by redsoxnation on 13.7.06 2320)
dunkndollaz
Banger
Level: 95

Posts: 1909/2524
EXP: 8500691
For next: 167947

Since: 3.1.02
From: Northern NJ

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#7 Posted on 13.7.06 2104.40
Reposted on: 13.7.13 2104.40
I think it is safe to say that the Yankees grabbed Ponson just so the Red Sox (who also put in a waiver claim) couldn't get him - not that I can see why anyone would want him......The yanks & sax are both "playing without a net" this season. It's the Division Title or no playoffs since the Wild Card is going to go to Detroit or Chicago.
BigSteve
Pepperoni
Level: 64

Posts: 1079/1091
EXP: 2150645
For next: 63464

Since: 23.7.04
From: Baltimore, MD

Since last post: 2659 days
Last activity: 2387 days
#8 Posted on 14.7.06 0149.11
Reposted on: 14.7.13 0149.54
The Ponson move is laughable. Not only is he terrible, but he's out of shape and uncommitted to working hard. It's ridiculous that a supposed playoff caliber team picked him up for their rotation. I tend to think the Yankees won't make the playoffs, and I wouldn't be at all shocked to see the Blue Jays finish second.

The reds deal was a steal for Washington. There's a good chance that the three guys they got were the three best players in the trade. I have no idea what the Reds could have been thinking with this move.
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 83

Posts: 1574/1857
EXP: 5252129
For next: 180115

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 336 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 14.7.06 0950.35
Reposted on: 14.7.13 0950.38
    Originally posted by BigSteve
    I have no idea what the Reds could have been thinking with this move.


They were thinking that their bullpen desperately needed help, and that their offense was good enough to lose a part or two in order to get it. Or maybe they thought they still had Wily Mo Pena to plug into the outfield.
jfkfc
Liverwurst
Level: 68

Posts: 703/1173
EXP: 2681954
For next: 46860

Since: 9.2.02

Since last post: 220 days
Last activity: 2 days
#10 Posted on 14.7.06 1127.51
Reposted on: 14.7.13 1128.05
    Originally posted by It's False
    I know the Yankees have it bad with Pavano on the shelf and Johnson past his prime, but do they really think Ponson is the answer? I would have taken my chances on bringing up one of the prospects, especially in light of Jonathan Palpelbon's success in Boston.
What exactly does Sidney Ponson have to be the answer for? Is anyone, Yankees management included, lifting this guy up as the #1 starter? Seriously, they brought him in to be the fifth starter, someone who is, right now anyway, not expected to get a single start in the postseason (if they make it). Does Ponson have the ability to be a better option than running Shawn Chacon or Kris Wilson out for another start, or taking Ron Villone out of the pen and putting him into the rotation? At this point, I think he could be. I don't see them making a play for a front-line pitcher. If the Phillies throw in the towel, perhaps they make a play for Abreau. Bringing in a grade-A outfielder may create issues if both Sheffield and Matsui come back healthy (who cares), but as long as they don't have to give up Hughes, or someone else of high value, I could see it.

Too bad that the Yanks couldn't have sent Chacon to Cincinatti for Kearns....that might have been nice.
skorpio17
Morcilla
Level: 51

Posts: 576/618
EXP: 1008031
For next: 5914

Since: 11.7.02
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 2227 days
Last activity: 2227 days
#11 Posted on 14.7.06 1158.10
Reposted on: 14.7.13 1158.13
The Reds made a pretty bad deal for themselves. They overpaid for some decent middle-relievers. Clayton, Harris, and Wagner are the throwins. It is not a deal for them to win this year. Their only hope is that in the long run, Bray is another H. Street. Only in the long run R. Wagner could be better than Bray or Majewski. I’d also rather have Rauch, if I'm forced to take a MR from the Nats. They should’ve been able to get the same deal without adding in Kearns. Just think of all the players they rejected in the last 2 years they could’ve traded Kearns for. He still has a lot of value.

I liked the idea of trading F. Lopez because I think he is overvalued. But the deal should’ve been much better. If you wanted 2 solid middle-relievers you could’ve went to the Cubs with Eyre, Howry, N. Perez for F. Lopez + R. Wagner. Or if you wanted to get rid F. Lopez, Kearns, + R. Wagner send them to Pit. for J. Wilson, R. Hernandez, Vogelsong, + (S. Torres or Marte).

The Nats are now better prepared to trade Soriano, Guillen, or even flip Kearns for prospects.
MisterHenderson
Boerewors
Level: 38

Posts: 14/359
EXP: 367112
For next: 3338

Since: 3.5.06
From: New York

Since last post: 1648 days
Last activity: 1567 days
#12 Posted on 16.7.06 1607.46
Reposted on: 16.7.13 1607.52
If you're Shawn Chicon, how depressed are you that the Yankees think an alcoholic (don't make you a bad person)is better than you.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: July 19 - Gwynn's first hit
Next thread: Prior goes on DL...again
Previous thread: New tv deals
(101 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: This one belongs to the Reds - A classy story about the Reds - any help from Cincy? - More...
The 7 - Baseball - Mr. Kearns go to Washington, Ponson to YanksRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.178 seconds.