The W
Views: 95632714
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.4.07 0218
The 7 - Baseball - Bronson Arroyo traded for Wily Mo Pena Register and log in to post!
(133 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (5 total)
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 83

Posts: 1515/1857
EXP: 5248772
For next: 183472

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 330 days
Last activity: 1 day
AIM:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 21.3.06 0858.23
Reposted on: 21.3.13 0859.01
And then there were 9...

Nine guys left from the 2004 title team: Schilling, Wakefield, Timlin, Foulke, Varitek, Ramirez, Ortiz, Nixon and Youkilis.

On paper it's a great deal for the Sox, since Wily Mo is basically coming in as a major upgrade from Gabe Kapler (unless Nixon gets traded before Opening Day). It just sucks that we had to get rid of a guy like Arroyo (who I like) to do it.
Promote this thread!
edoug
Summer sausage
Level: 43

Posts: 152/429
EXP: 541797
For next: 23254

Since: 13.2.04
From: Maine

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 4 hours
#2 Posted on 21.3.06 1207.44
Reposted on: 21.3.13 1207.55
Bronson signed for below market value deal. He really wanted to stay but business is business. Hope they like grunge music in Cincy.
Mr. Boffo
Scrapple
Level: 114

Posts: 1521/3844
EXP: 15823690
For next: 485927

Since: 24.3.02
From: Oshkosh, WI

Since last post: 264 days
Last activity: 225 days
#3 Posted on 21.3.06 1814.27
Reposted on: 21.3.13 1816.04
Given that he signed for below market value, he should have made sure there was a no-trade clause in his contract. It would have been only fair.
redsoxnation
Scrapple
Level: 151

Posts: 5086/7534
EXP: 42815238
For next: 481338

Since: 24.7.02

Since last post: 292 days
Last activity: 292 days
#4 Posted on 21.3.06 2022.51
Reposted on: 21.3.13 2026.56
    Originally posted by Mr. Boffo
    Given that he signed for below market value, he should have made sure there was a no-trade clause in his contract. It would have been only fair.







The Red Sox won't give no trade clauses. Closest they come (outside of guys becoming 10-5) is putting clauses in contracts that if they give someone else a no-trade clause, a no trade clause would kick in on that players contract. Varitek is an example of that.
Good trade for Boston. Would rather have dumped Clement, but they picked Arroyo (or, for those who follow the wit and wisdom of that noted 21st century philosopher Tim McCarver: Brandon Arojo) up off of waivers from Pittsburgh, used him in the back of the rotation for 2 years, and flipped him for a right handed power hitter who is there likely right-fielder of the future. Doubtful Arroyo would do more than the 14 wins/4.50'ish ERA he had last season, so the Red Sox bought low and sold high. The way Arroyo struggles against left-handers, he is really going into a bad ballpark. He has shown he can pitch a strong game and is a tough pitcher, but he also can put together a string of 2.2IP/7R/6ER/8H/2BB/2HBP games together.
Crimedog
Boerewors
Level: 41

Posts: 338/374
EXP: 479995
For next: 154

Since: 28.3.02
From: Ohio

Since last post: 2522 days
Last activity: 2513 days
#5 Posted on 22.3.06 0026.12
Reposted on: 22.3.13 0029.01
If the Reds had traded Sean Casey for Brandon Arroyo I would have been thrilled. But I'm damn near homicidal over the fact that they gave up Wily Mo. He's going to be a stud for a long, long time.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: PLUNK BIGGIO
Next thread: Soriano refuses to play left
Previous thread: The World Baseball Classic
(133 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Theo returns - At Least It Won't Just Be The Fans Who Are Mentally Irregular This Season - Theo - GONE! - More...
The 7 - Baseball - Bronson Arroyo traded for Wily Mo PenaRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.148 seconds.