The W
Views: 99049893
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
19.9.07 1913
The 7 - Music - Most Grammys Given Out Before Show Even Starts
This thread has 1 referral leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(287 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (2 total)
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 213

Posts: 7309/16220
EXP: 141122638
For next: 2244269

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 3 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 8.2.06 1938.26
Reposted on: 8.2.13 1940.53
Let me spoil it for you: Kraftwerk didn't win their Grammy; Chemical Brothers ruined the dance party by taking ERVRYTHING.

For everything else, click on http://www.grammy.com/GRAMMY_Awards/Annual_Show/48_nominees.aspx
Promote this thread!
drjayphd
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 115

Posts: 2762/3942
EXP: 16663829
For next: 147586

Since: 22.4.02
From: Long Island

Since last post: 6 days
Last activity: 4 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#2 Posted on 8.2.06 2302.34
Reposted on: 8.2.13 2306.00
By "ervrything", you mean "two awards". "Galvanize" wasn't too bad, but let's review the competition. Didn't hear the Deep Dish or Kylie nominees, "Wonderful Night" wasn't all that great, especially if you REALLY like Fatboy Slim's one song, New Order's in "good but not great" territory (as I'm not sure they could match their peaks on Get Ready, never mind the classics), and I don't think I heard LCD Soundsystem's entry, but they're not really Grammy material. Good, but not award-winning good.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: iTunes Top Downloads -- February 12, 2006
Next thread: Rolling Stones' Performance Censored
Previous thread: iTunes Top Downloads -- February 05, 2006
(287 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Grammy Nominations Announced - YOUR GRAMMY WINNERS 2004 - Grammy nominations - More...
The 7 - Music - Most Grammys Given Out Before Show Even StartsRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2014 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.27 seconds.