The Goon
Banger Moderator Level: 103
Posts: 1392/2519 EXP: 11386560 For next: 84885
Since: 2.1.02 From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Since last post: 853 days Last activity: 831 days
| #21 Posted on 7.1.06 1923.42 Reposted on: 7.1.13 1923.52 | I'm only in my second year of following the NFL, and I haven't really picked a team to cheer for yet. I also don't know much about strategy, so I'll skip all the prelims and just say:
Indianapolis over Seattle.
I know it's the easy pick, but I don't expect too many surprises. | Texas Kelly
Lap cheong Level: 83
Posts: 810/1528 EXP: 5379113 For next: 53131
Since: 3.1.02 From: FOREST HILLS CONTROLS THE UNIVERSE
Since last post: 2358 days Last activity: 1520 days
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #22 Posted on 7.1.06 1958.46 Reposted on: 7.1.13 1959.02 | About the Bucs game, all I have to say is this:
When we beat the Redskins under questionable circumstances, the Redskins had the courtesy of having the play that decided the game reviewed, even when it was ambiguous at best to see how it would turn out. When the Redskins beat us today, we did not get that same courtesy... and what's worse, the review would have been crystal-clear as to the call being wrong.
*trudges out of thread, interest decreased by 95%*
(edited by Texas Kelly on 7.1.06 2059) | Jaguar
Knackwurst Level: 116
Posts: 3209/3284 EXP: 16927221 For next: 396924
Since: 23.1.02 From: In a Blue State finally
Since last post: 1894 days Last activity: 1894 days
| #23 Posted on 7.1.06 2001.19 Reposted on: 7.1.13 2003.46 | Wait, which play was this? | Texas Kelly
Lap cheong Level: 83
Posts: 811/1528 EXP: 5379113 For next: 53131
Since: 3.1.02 From: FOREST HILLS CONTROLS THE UNIVERSE
Since last post: 2358 days Last activity: 1520 days
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #24 Posted on 7.1.06 2009.07 Reposted on: 7.1.13 2009.12 | Originally posted by Jaguar Wait, which play was this?
Arrington's return of his interception of Simms. You know, the play where he clearly FUMBLED THE BALL back to the Bucs before being brought down, and the idiot refs ruled him down by contact, not only depriving us of the ball but of a chance to challenge, leading to Portis being in the end zone one play later. That was the difference in the game, ultimately, because with the right call there, the game would have been tied 10-10 in the fourth when we went for it on fourth down, and we would have kicked it instead.
We lost to Chicago the EXACT SAME WAY, only without the dubious circumstances.
(edited by Texas Kelly on 7.1.06 2112) | sweetroll
Cotechino Level: 23
Posts: 56/82 EXP: 66547 For next: 1177
Since: 23.3.02 From: Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
Since last post: 3766 days Last activity: 2651 days
| #25 Posted on 7.1.06 2314.08 Reposted on: 7.1.13 2316.13 | Well, I guess I'm a little late to the party, but at least I'll give some full disclosure: I picked Tampa to win today.
Having said that:
NFC Wild Card Sunday: Giants over Panthers... Which Carolina team shows up? I think the one that lost to Miami, Baton Orlantonio and Dallas. AFC Wild Card Sunday: Steelers over Bengals... Cincy's offense won't be on the field enough to make a difference.
NFC Divisional: Redskins over Seahawks... Seattle beat just two playoff teams: the Colts' second string, and the Giants via Feely's f-ups. NFC Divisional: Bears over Giants... Poor Eli won't know what hit him. AFC Divisional: Colts over Steelers... Indy's D > Cincy's D. AFC Divisional: Patriots over Broncos... Jake Plummer finally realizes he's Jake Plummer.
NFC: Bears over Redskins... Payback for the 9-7 week 1 thriller. AFC: Patriots over Colts... As a Gator, I can't help but expect Manning to come up short when it counts.
XL: Bears 46, Patriots 10... 1986 redux. | Whitebacon
Banger Level: 104
Posts: 2020/2567 EXP: 11706158 For next: 156007
Since: 12.1.02 From: Fresno, CA
Since last post: 110 days Last activity: 10 days
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #26 Posted on 8.1.06 0141.22 Reposted on: 8.1.13 0141.58 | It was nice of the refs to flag and kick out Sean Taylor after Michael Pittman slapped/punched him. | Gugs
Bierwurst Level: 90
Posts: 1474/1857 EXP: 7123423 For next: 65213
Since: 9.7.02 From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)
Since last post: 3952 days Last activity: 3081 days
| | Y!: | |
|
| #27 Posted on 8.1.06 0230.30 Reposted on: 8.1.13 0231.01 | Originally posted by Whitebacon It was nice of the refs to flag and kick out Sean Taylor after Michael Pittman slapped/punched him.
Apparently Taylor spat at Pittman. I didn't see it (and neither did the guys calling the game, as they were all over the refs until the spitting explanation came out), but if that's the case then Pittman didn't do anything wrong. | Whitebacon
Banger Level: 104
Posts: 2021/2567 EXP: 11706158 For next: 156007
Since: 12.1.02 From: Fresno, CA
Since last post: 110 days Last activity: 10 days
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #28 Posted on 8.1.06 0303.20 Reposted on: 8.1.13 0306.53 | Explains a lot. I missed the explanation of the explanation while I was getting ready for work. | BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni Level: 72
Posts: 784/1104 EXP: 3228551 For next: 95227
Since: 2.1.03 From: MA
Since last post: 1381 days Last activity: 1380 days
| | Y!: | |
|
| #29 Posted on 8.1.06 1500.29 Reposted on: 8.1.13 1502.19 | After that Giant's game today, I hope Pieman is doing OK. | CRZ
Big Brother Administrator Level: 239
Posts: 7210/17694 EXP: 212286696 For next: 1874103
Since: 9.12.01 From: ミネアポリス
Since last post: 17 days Last activity: 8 days
| ICQ: | |
| Y!: | |
|
| #30 Posted on 8.1.06 1522.15 Reposted on: 8.1.13 1523.26 | Originally posted by BOSsportsfan34 After that Giant's game today, I hope Pieman is doing OK.
He's used to cheering for a crappy team. The REAL question is, will he finally change his signature and/or avatar?
(DISCLAIMER: I too am used to cheering for a crappy team) | BOSsportsfan34
Pepperoni Level: 72
Posts: 785/1104 EXP: 3228551 For next: 95227
Since: 2.1.03 From: MA
Since last post: 1381 days Last activity: 1380 days
| | Y!: | |
|
| #31 Posted on 8.1.06 1616.59 Reposted on: 8.1.13 1618.05 | I think he'll put up his KC Royals sig/avatar once baseball season comes around. | redsoxnation
Scrapple Level: 165
Posts: 5003/7534 EXP: 58154887 For next: 780918
Since: 24.7.02
Since last post: 3914 days Last activity: 3914 days
| #32 Posted on 8.1.06 2117.05 Reposted on: 8.1.13 2122.22 | In playoff history at the Meadowlands, it is now Opponents 64 Manning Brothers 0. A quick look at the last 2 playoff games the Bengals participated in: In 1-91 they lose to the Raiders, but destroy Bo Jackson's hip in the process. 1-06 they lose to the Steelers, but have Carson Palmer's knee virtually destroyed. Just when you think you can take the Bungle out of the Bengals, they blow a 17-7 home playoff lead and get buried with a double pass. | It's False
Scrapple Level: 151
Posts: 1453/6155 EXP: 43034145 For next: 262431
Since: 20.6.02 From: I am the Tag Team Champions!
Since last post: 2190 days Last activity: 572 days
| #33 Posted on 9.1.06 0038.12 Reposted on: 9.1.13 0046.15 | Pittsburg played some physical football today and the Bengals were dropping like flies, so much so that I almost thought the Steelers were playing to hurt people more than win. They looked like juggernauts, though, and I'm seriously considering betting against Indy next week.
As for the Giants, there goes my NFC Super Bowl pick. Props to Carolina, because they shut down Tiki Barber big time. | whatever
Bierwurst Level: 91
Posts: 826/1874 EXP: 7287925 For next: 181016
Since: 12.2.02 From: Cleveland, Ohio
Since last post: 1447 days Last activity: 1407 days
| #34 Posted on 9.1.06 0817.41 Reposted on: 9.1.13 0824.09 | Wow, after watching the Cincy-Pitt game, I really felt for the Bengals fans 'cause the Bengals really looked like the Browns out there. That flea-flicker especially killed me. God, I hate the Steelers.
Divisional Picks: Indy 31 Pittsburgh 24 Denver 17 New England 14 Seattle 21 Washington 17 Chicago 24 Carolina 20 | El Nastio
Banger Level: 104
Posts: 963/2576 EXP: 11766587 For next: 95578
Since: 14.1.02 From: Ottawa Ontario, by way of Walkerton
Since last post: 33 days Last activity: 18 days
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #35 Posted on 9.1.06 1219.22 Reposted on: 9.1.13 1220.12 | dunkndollaz: 4/4 Reverend J Shaft: 4/4 Torchslasher: 4/4 Jaguar: 4/4
redsoxnation: 3/4 BigSteve: 3/4 BOSsportsfan: 3/4 Big Bad: 3/4 Texas Kelly: 3/4 whatever: 3/4
spf: 2/4 Wpob: 2/4 Gugs: 2/4 Mayhem: 2/4 Redcumo: 2/4 Santa Sangre: 2/4
El Nastio: 1/4 (eep!).
Well turns out most people got burnt on the NYG/Panthers game. Myself, I doubted the Patriots. And I think I was the only one to pick against them. I still have my doubts about them.
I also wonder how the Bengal's would've done if Palmer didn't get hurt. | Jaguar
Knackwurst Level: 116
Posts: 3210/3284 EXP: 16927221 For next: 396924
Since: 23.1.02 From: In a Blue State finally
Since last post: 1894 days Last activity: 1894 days
| #36 Posted on 9.1.06 2239.35 Reposted on: 9.1.13 2240.51 | I'm only 3/4. I picked the Jaguars because I didn't realize that they would have forgotten how to play football so quickly. Plus, Brady has to lose someday - right? Anyway, fixing my AFC picks.
Denver over New England - Both the Broncos and the Patriots have been much better than I thought they'd be. Can Champ, Lynch, and the Browns keep the Pats out of the endzone? I think they can, and I think Denver's offense will continue to play well enough to win this one.
Indianapolis over Pittsburgh - The Steelers didn't look all that strong against Kitna and the supposed "No D" Bengals until late in the game. Peyton and the Colts should have this one figured out. Plus nobody wants to disappoint the Broncos and make them miss their revenge game, right? | Wpob
Bierwurst Level: 92
Posts: 569/1930 EXP: 7482769 For next: 274198
Since: 21.11.02 From: Williston Park, NY
Since last post: 1444 days Last activity: 1210 days
| #37 Posted on 10.1.06 0727.08 Reposted on: 10.1.13 0727.32 | If we are fixing picks, then I am going with:
Carolina over Chicago Seattle over Washington New England over Denver Indianapolis over Pittsburgh
Carolina over Seattle New England over Indianapolis
New England over Carolina (again). | Texas Kelly
Lap cheong Level: 83
Posts: 815/1528 EXP: 5379113 For next: 53131
Since: 3.1.02 From: FOREST HILLS CONTROLS THE UNIVERSE
Since last post: 2358 days Last activity: 1520 days
| ICQ: | |
| |
| #38 Posted on 10.1.06 0752.29 Reposted on: 10.1.13 0752.34 | Fixed picks:
Seattle crushes Washington to pieces New England over Denver Carolina over Chicago Indianapolis over Pittsburgh
Seattle over Carolina New England over Indianapolis
New England over Seattle | jfkfc
Liverwurst Level: 74
Posts: 651/1179 EXP: 3637377 For next: 16184
Since: 9.2.02
Since last post: 2877 days Last activity: 2686 days
| #39 Posted on 10.1.06 0848.06 Reposted on: 10.1.13 0848.14 | Newly submitted picks (I had TB and NY as in-my-head-and-missed-the-start-of-the-picks-post picks):
Seattle over Washington New England over Denver Indianapolis over Pittsburgh Chicago over Carolina
New England over Indianapolis Chicago over Seattle
Chicago over New England (please, no shuffle)
Hooray for even-numbered years with only one week between the Conference Championships and the Superbowl! | sweetroll
Cotechino Level: 23
Posts: 58/82 EXP: 66547 For next: 1177
Since: 23.3.02 From: Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
Since last post: 3766 days Last activity: 2651 days
| #40 Posted on 10.1.06 0857.03 Reposted on: 10.1.13 0857.33 | Originally posted by jfkfc Hooray for even-numbered years with only one week between the Conference Championships and the Superbowl!
Not this year, though. We've got the two week waiting period. (BTW, f'ing hilarious screenname, jfkfc. Nice Ed Broth reference.)
My revised picks:
Seattle over Washington Chicago over Carolina
New England over Denver Indianapolis over Pittsburgh
Chicago over Seattle New England over Indianapolis
XL: Chicago over New England |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |