The W
Views: 129709103
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
16.12.10 0324
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - the C4 lives Register and log in to post!
Pages: 1 2 Next(2771 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (23 total)
fmspike121
Loukanika
Banned
Level: 8

Posts: 7/8
EXP: 1514
For next: 673

Since: 8.9.05
From: Dudley, England

Since last post: 4367 days
Last activity: 4342 days
#1 Posted on 31.12.05 1425.21
Reposted on: 31.12.12 1425.46
yes Paul Burchill has finally hit the DEVESTATING C4, if no-one has seen it check on Velocity on WWE.com, watched it about 200 times, still in shock of it. What you think of it?

(edited by fmspike121 on 19.3.06 0027)

(edited by fmspike121 on 19.3.06 0028)

(edited by fmspike121 on 19.3.06 0040)
Promote this thread!
Tenken347
Knackwurst
Level: 105

Posts: 861/3024
EXP: 12226278
For next: 36022

Since: 27.2.03
From: Parts Unknown

Since last post: 1 day
Last activity: 19 hours
#2 Posted on 31.12.05 1450.36
Reposted on: 31.12.12 1451.30
Eh, I think it looks a little fake. Not "Canadian Destroyer" fake, but fake.
fmspike121
Loukanika
Banned
Level: 8

Posts: 8/8
EXP: 1514
For next: 673

Since: 8.9.05
From: Dudley, England

Since last post: 4367 days
Last activity: 4342 days
#3 Posted on 31.12.05 1455.14
Reposted on: 31.12.12 1456.34
its a good move people have just got to give him a chance.
Tribal Prophet
Andouille
Level: 91

Posts: 1245/2072
EXP: 7194819
For next: 274122

Since: 9.1.02
From: Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Since last post: 642 days
Last activity: 181 days
#4 Posted on 31.12.05 1539.09
Reposted on: 31.12.12 1539.12
Sorry, but I just don't think it's that good of a move. I mean, the guy flips over. You actually take more damage by landing on your face/chest than the opponent who lands on his back.

It's close to that same viewing impact that RVD's moves have. Where non-hardcore-RVD-fans ask "Why does he bother flipping? Doesn't that just waste energy?" It looks good and is flashy, but I don't think that it has enough realism to win over fans like other finishers do (People's Elbow/Worm not withstanding, as those are supposed to be joke moves).

And then there's the fact that you could only ever do this move to about 10% of the roster than he works with (either because they're too big, or else because they just won't be flipped around like that due to "main event match" training).


Tribal Prophet
ekedolphin
Scrapple
Level: 139

Posts: 2917/5609
EXP: 32039084
For next: 428443

Since: 12.1.02
From: Indianapolis, IN; now residing in Suffolk, VA

Since last post: 5 days
Last activity: 7 hours
#5 Posted on 31.12.05 1608.11
Reposted on: 31.12.12 1610.11
(deleted by CRZ on 31.12.05 2011)
AWArulz
Scrapple
Level: 116

Posts: 1487/3722
EXP: 17294170
For next: 29975

Since: 28.1.02
From: Louisville, KY

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#6 Posted on 31.12.05 1610.10
Reposted on: 31.12.12 1610.49
It's certainly as "realistic" as some other implausible moves. (Trish's headstand Huracanrana comes to mind). I think it would look better if Paul could somehow come out on top of the guy he's flipping. In the GIF (which is all I watched), you could see all the help, but it was in slow mo. Lemme see Benoit take it and see what a sell really looks like on that move.
CRZ
Big Brother
Administrator
Level: 225

Posts: 7194/17203
EXP: 172583644
For next: 948610

Since: 9.12.01
From: ミネアポリス

Since last post: 11 hours
Last activity: 10 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 31.12.05 2014.12
Reposted on: 31.12.12 2015.55
    Originally posted by fmspike121
    its a good move people have just got to give him a chance.
Where have I read this before? Oh, right, EVERY POST YOU'VE EVER MADE. See ya
Mayhem
Scrapple
Level: 115

Posts: 2304/3693
EXP: 16413072
For next: 398343

Since: 25.4.03
From: Nashville, TN

Since last post: 144 days
Last activity: 29 days
#8 Posted on 31.12.05 2255.37
Reposted on: 31.12.12 2256.16

While we're on the subject of this week's Velocity, what's up with the gold masks that Kendrick & London both wore to the ring?
chill
Landjager
Level: 64

Posts: 627/930
EXP: 2139539
For next: 74570

Since: 18.5.02

Since last post: 3837 days
Last activity: 3837 days
#9 Posted on 1.1.06 0021.16
Reposted on: 1.1.13 0021.29
    Originally posted by Mayhem

    While we're on the subject of this week's Velocity, what's up with the gold masks that Kendrick & London both wore to the ring?


Whatever it is, I LIKE THEM! They seem to be borrowed from Stanley Kubrick's "Eyes Wide Shut." Either way, I like the outfits and entrances. I haven't been watching WWE for almost half a year, but checked this out to see Kendrick and London in action.

And by no means is that an impressive C4. It's probably the worst C4 I've seen Burchill do so far.
meaty_buys
Haggis
Level: 18

Posts: 50/52
EXP: 25302
For next: 4596

Since: 29.6.05

Since last post: 4330 days
Last activity: 4306 days
#10 Posted on 1.1.06 0046.23
Reposted on: 1.1.13 0047.06
It's not bad, better than the usual routine set of moves we're conditioned to from WWE. But unless this guy can be allowed to put some personality behind his character, he'll just be another Petey Williams.
Matt Tracker
Scrapple
Level: 133

Posts: 1386/5230
EXP: 27627523
For next: 225217

Since: 8.5.03
From: North Carolina

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 12 hours
#11 Posted on 1.1.06 1013.00
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1013.55
It's an eye-catching move that is immediately limited in the amount of people he can do that to. I don't see anyone over 220 pounds doing their part in the maneuver, and that's pretty much everyone not on Velocity. He needs a stronger finisher that can be applied to anyone.

But if I was playing a WWE videogame customized character, yeah, that'd be a finisher.

(edited by Matt Tracker on 1.1.06 0813)
Jonny_English
Mettwurst
Level: 29

Posts: 147/157
EXP: 139389
For next: 8497

Since: 18.3.04
From: Derby, UK

Since last post: 4002 days
Last activity: 3825 days
#12 Posted on 1.1.06 1148.05
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1149.18
As one of the few Brits that doesn't get an instant hard-on at the mention of this guys name, I 'll say that move is the drizzling shits. Further, I would say that most true wrestling fans will share this opinion. Suspension of disbelief anyone?
JST
Toulouse
Level: 72

Posts: 815/1238
EXP: 3319714
For next: 4064

Since: 20.1.02
From: Quebec City, CAN

Since last post: 242 days
Last activity: 10 days
#13 Posted on 1.1.06 1332.31
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1332.34
Isn't that Benoit taking the move in the gif?
chill
Landjager
Level: 64

Posts: 628/930
EXP: 2139539
For next: 74570

Since: 18.5.02

Since last post: 3837 days
Last activity: 3837 days
#14 Posted on 1.1.06 1405.01
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1405.21
It's Paul London. Hopefully, when we see Benoit v. Burchill, it's a match that means something and not just a Smackdown filler match.
shinstrife
Boudin rouge
Level: 49

Posts: 433/512
EXP: 863102
For next: 20787

Since: 5.10.02

Since last post: 653 days
Last activity: 19 hours
AIM:  
#15 Posted on 1.1.06 1444.47
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1445.53
    Originally posted by chill
    It's Paul London. Hopefully, when we see Benoit v. Burchill, it's a match that means something and not just a Smackdown filler match.


Actually, it's John Xavier taking the C4 in the gif.
kingleo
Linguica
Level: 21

Posts: 19/75
EXP: 44849
For next: 5095

Since: 26.11.04
From: Logan, UT

Since last post: 791 days
Last activity: 757 days
#16 Posted on 1.1.06 1724.00
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1724.03
The C4 might look OK if the opponent just sold it falling back as Burchill starts falling, but even then it would probably make a better escape move than a finisher. As it is now, I don't even see how it theoretically works. If we were conditioned to it being sold that way instead of the flippy sell, Burchill could even use it against bigger non-athletic guys.

(edited by kingleo on 1.1.06 1725)
jwrestle
Lap cheong
Level: 80

Posts: 863/1616
EXP: 4760107
For next: 22882

Since: 4.4.03
From: Nitro WV

Since last post: 466 days
Last activity: 229 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#17 Posted on 1.1.06 1749.50
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1750.01
Ok, that's is one of those eye catching moves. So it's a flatlinner with flip. I'm not sure if it should be such a big deal. I think looks ok as does the Canadian Destroyer. Yeah, a bit fakeish yet good.
Karlos the Jackal
Lap cheong
Level: 84

Posts: 633/1760
EXP: 5636254
For next: 25722

Since: 2.1.02
From: The City of Subdued Excitement

Since last post: 717 days
Last activity: 8 hours
#18 Posted on 1.1.06 1918.43
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1918.54
I think maybe Paul could reach over and grab the back of the guy's trunks with his left hand. That would at least give a pretend reason for the victim to flip over.

On the other hand, so what? There are so many moves that are so patently fake -- starting with the Irish whip ("I can't stop running!") -- that it sometimes seems pointless to draw a line and say, "now, this is too fake!"

The Canadian Destroyer and the C4 look cool and I've never seen anything like them, which is enough for me, since I accept so much stuff that is CLEARLY cooperative as it is.

(My personal least favorite is the delayed vertical suplex. "Oh no, I'm being held upside down! I better hold my legs straight up, as rigid as I possibly can!" I just don't get it.)

--K
Kane Is Ugly
Kishke
Level: 45

Posts: 294/422
EXP: 629217
For next: 30952

Since: 14.7.03
From: Uglyville

Since last post: 3574 days
Last activity: 3560 days
#19 Posted on 1.1.06 1923.20
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1924.01
    Originally posted by Karlos the Jackal
    I think maybe Paul could reach over and grab the back of the guy's trunks with his left hand. That would at least give a pretend reason for the victim to flip over.

    On the other hand, so what? There are so many moves that are so patently fake -- starting with the Irish whip ("I can't stop running!") -- that it sometimes seems pointless to draw a line and say, "now, this is too fake!"

    The Canadian Destroyer and the C4 look cool and I've never seen anything like them, which is enough for me, since I accept so much stuff that is CLEARLY cooperative as it is.

    (My personal least favorite is the delayed vertical suplex. "Oh no, I'm being held upside down! I better hold my legs straight up, as rigid as I possibly can!" I just don't get it.)

    --K



Well, the idea of the standing vertical suplex is that you are upside down for a long period of time of the blood rushes to your head. When you hit the mat, you'd be all out of it I guess, so a pin attempt might be easier than after a regular suplex. Its really more of a power move for the guy doing it really. It just shows that the guy suplexing you is strong and can hold you up for a while.

(edited by Kane Is Ugly on 1.1.06 1924)
Karlos the Jackal
Lap cheong
Level: 84

Posts: 634/1760
EXP: 5636254
For next: 25722

Since: 2.1.02
From: The City of Subdued Excitement

Since last post: 717 days
Last activity: 8 hours
#20 Posted on 1.1.06 1927.06
Reposted on: 1.1.13 1927.43
    Originally posted by Kane Is Ugly
    Well, the idea of the standing vertical suplex is that you are upside down for a long period of time of the blood rushes to your head. When you hit the mat, you'd be all out of it I guess, so a pin attempt might be easier than after a regular suplex. Its really more of a power move for the guy doing it really. It just shows that the guy suplexing you is strong and can hold you up for a while.
Yeah -- but I meant, what makes the victim decide to hold himself straight up and not bend his legs? It's a position that's both unnatural and disadvantageous.

--K



(edited by Karlos the Jackal on 1.1.06 1728)
Pages: 1 2 NextThread ahead: Charlie Haas Return
Next thread: RAW #658 1/2/06
Previous thread: WWE signs giant from "The Longest Yard"
(2771 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Velocity Workrate Report 9/24/05 - Velocity 7/16/05 - Paul London Appreciation - More...
The 7 - Pro Wrestling - the C4 livesRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.397 seconds.