The W
Views: 104666633
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
25.5.08 2305
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Red Cross does not have access to all US prisoners
This thread has 2 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(274 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (11 total)
Jonny_English
Mettwurst
Level: 28

Posts: 143/157
EXP: 125738
For next: 5602

Since: 18.3.04
From: Derby, UK

Since last post: 3067 days
Last activity: 2890 days
#1 Posted on 9.12.05 0242.56
Reposted on: 9.12.12 0243.02
Apparently, John Bellinger has confirmed that although the Red Cross has access to all prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay, it does not have access to other prisoners held in similar circumstances.

I have to say that this troubles me deeply. One (speculative) conclusion could be that we (I use we as, although I'm British, you can bet that Blair has knowledge of this at the very least), are using torture on prisoners held overseas. If so, is it a victory for terrorists if we are transported from a rational, civilised people who offer dignity and rehabilitation to offenders, into those who would torture and abuse in 21st century gulags?

Here is the link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4512192.stm
Promote this thread!
DrDirt
Banger
Level: 97

Posts: 1523/2715
EXP: 9219865
For next: 97493

Since: 8.10.03
From: flyover country

Since last post: 30 days
Last activity: 13 hours
#2 Posted on 9.12.05 0636.02
Reposted on: 9.12.12 0636.20
Aside from your concerns, which I mostly agree with, the aspect about torture that confuses me the most is that much of the intel gathered is suspect.

The other aspect that is troubling is that this whole issue provides so much fodder for our enemies

(edited by DrDirt on 9.12.05 0636)
Tribal Prophet
Andouille
Level: 88

Posts: 1217/2068
EXP: 6572294
For next: 78396

Since: 9.1.02
From: Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Since last post: 21 days
Last activity: 3 days
#3 Posted on 9.12.05 1143.04
Reposted on: 9.12.12 1143.39
I thought the common consensus was not that "we have gone from civilized to brutal", but that we have simply been caught doing what we've been doing under the table for a hundred years.

I mean, I'm not the only one that doesn't believe that torture being used by government in war times (or even non-war times) is new, am I?


Tribal Prophet
Jonny_English
Mettwurst
Level: 28

Posts: 144/157
EXP: 125738
For next: 5602

Since: 18.3.04
From: Derby, UK

Since last post: 3067 days
Last activity: 2890 days
#4 Posted on 9.12.05 1254.43
Reposted on: 9.12.12 1256.18
    Originally posted by DrDirt
    Aside from your concerns, which I mostly agree with, the aspect about torture that confuses me the most is that much of the intel gathered is suspect.

    The other aspect that is troubling is that this whole issue provides so much fodder for our enemies

    (edited by DrDirt on 9.12.05 0636)


Indeed. Beat me long enough and I'll tell you a horse is a chicken. There are such suspicions over the veracity of information gathered using torture, that the UK House of Lords has recently declared evidence gathered this way inadmissible in court.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4509530.stm
ShotGunShep
Frankfurter
Level: 59

Posts: 747/836
EXP: 1617371
For next: 55767

Since: 20.2.03

Since last post: 2752 days
Last activity: 2638 days
#5 Posted on 9.12.05 1256.45
Reposted on: 9.12.12 1257.24
I don't have a problem not letting in anti-american crusaders into our prisons.

The ICRC calls "mental anguish" torture. Nuff said.
spf
Scrapple
Level: 133

Posts: 3396/5408
EXP: 27813633
For next: 39107

Since: 2.1.02
From: The Las Vegas of Canada

Since last post: 30 days
Last activity: 5 hours
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 9.12.05 1619.00
Reposted on: 9.12.12 1619.36
You know, if we're really this unconcerned with international reaction or any of that, why don't we just shoot the whole lot of them? Would free up the resources at Guantanamo, and if you're of the opinion that the world can go screw itself, this shouldn't be any different. After all, they are all terrorists according to the Bush administration, so they're guilty without trial or anything like that.

I just wish we would pick one way or the other. If we truly want to wage war, and are going to be bad-ass and tell the world to piss off, then let's do it. Start bringing the wrath of God down upon anyone in our way. Want to scare some possible terrorists, put a bullet in every head at Gitmo and then dump them in the middle of Baghdad. Right now we're just bad-ass enough to be John Wayne until we see someone who kind of scares us *cough*Iran*cough* and then we suddenly go to the negotiating table and let Europe talk for years on end.

We are not going to ever win the PR war as long as we are doign things like this, so why let artificially created impediments on our tactics hamstring us? Obviously I would prefer we actually try not to piss off the entire world on a daily basis, but if we're going to do it, I'd rather actually give them all something to be really pissed about.
skorpio17
Morcilla
Level: 52

Posts: 529/618
EXP: 1053413
For next: 30435

Since: 11.7.02
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 2624 days
Last activity: 2624 days
#7 Posted on 13.12.05 1907.09
Reposted on: 13.12.12 1907.30
Torture is a necessary evil. Just watch an episode of 24.
EddieBurkett
Boudin blanc
Level: 93

Posts: 1312/2354
EXP: 7987317
For next: 65523

Since: 3.1.02
From: GA in person, NJ in heart

Since last post: 13 days
Last activity: 5 min.
#8 Posted on 13.12.05 2225.16
Reposted on: 13.12.12 2227.10
    Originally posted by skorpio17
    Torture is a necessary evil. Just watch an episode of 24.


You're kidding, right? If you are going to cite an episode of a fictional show as evidence for an argument, then I will say you should watch the Jon Stewart interview of John McCain on an episode of the Daily Show about a month ago, which happened shortly after McCain spearheaded the vote on the torture bill. They both specifically said that while 24 makes for good television, it is not representative of how torture is beneficial to our country.

Now, understand that I'm not saying I'm against torture in extreme cases. I just don't think that 24 is really what the argument should be hinged upon.
skorpio17
Morcilla
Level: 52

Posts: 530/618
EXP: 1053413
For next: 30435

Since: 11.7.02
From: New Jersey

Since last post: 2624 days
Last activity: 2624 days
#9 Posted on 15.12.05 1950.58
Reposted on: 15.12.12 1951.08
    Originally posted by EddieBurkett
      Originally posted by skorpio17
      Torture is a necessary evil. Just watch an episode of 24.


    You're kidding, right? If you are going to cite an episode of a fictional show as evidence for an argument, then I will say you should watch the Jon Stewart interview of John McCain on an episode of the Daily Show about a month ago, which happened shortly after McCain spearheaded the vote on the torture bill. They both specifically said that while 24 makes for good television, it is not representative of how torture is beneficial to our country.

    Now, understand that I'm not saying I'm against torture in extreme cases. I just don't think that 24 is really what the argument should be hinged upon.


How do you not torture a Said Ali? He knows where the bomb is! If that doesn't work, you torture his family and kill his sons until he talks.

Though a terrorist refusing to reveal a nuclear(sp.-W) bomb may be an extreme case, I don't believe the McCain bill makes any exceptions for torture even in the extreme cases you seem to support.

Today Bush backtracked to support the feel-good McCain bill anyway. Now the terrorists can't even be "degraded" whatever their lawyers should decide that to mean.
Guru Zim
SQL Dejection
Administrator
Level: 140

Posts: 3607/6075
EXP: 33196410
For next: 90077

Since: 9.12.01
From: Bay City, OR

Since last post: 8 days
Last activity: 11 hours
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#10 Posted on 16.12.05 0034.14
Reposted on: 16.12.12 0035.57
Technically, they can still torture I believe. They just aren't exempted from consequences. In other words, there would be a trial or tribunal.

I'm not saying I know the whole law so I could be wrong.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 107

Posts: 3176/3273
EXP: 13067572
For next: 23781

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 413 days
Last activity: 214 days
#11 Posted on 16.12.05 0712.38
Reposted on: 16.12.12 0714.17
Well according to the Colbert Report, the McCain bill forced our soldiers to adhere to the military field operations manual.

So the Pentagon changed the military field operations manual's definitions of torture.



Hooray?
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Not just HIV, but full blown AIDS!
Next thread: Sami al-Arian acquitted
Previous thread: US executed 1,000 person
(274 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
The 7 - Current Events & Politics - Red Cross does not have access to all US prisonersRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.368 seconds.