The W
Views: 106693373
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
28.8.08 1921
The 7 - Football - NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 12
This thread has 25 referrals leading to it
Register and log in to post!
(453 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (12 total)
JayJayDean
Scrapple
Level: 127

Posts: 2434/4747
EXP: 23095275
For next: 631356

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 34 days
Last activity: 2 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#1 Posted on 1.12.05 0902.19
Reposted on: 1.12.12 0902.45
NFL PLAYOFF SEEDINGS AFTER WEEK 12

AFC
1. Indianapolis (11-0) AFC South leaders
2. Denver (9-2) AFC West leaders
3. Cincinnati (8-3) AFC North leaders
4. New England (6-5) AFC East leaders
5. Jacksonville (8-3) Wild card
6. Pittsburgh (7-4) Wild card

7. San Diego (7-4)
8. Kansas City (7-4)
9. Buffalo (4-7)
10. Cleveland (4-7)
11. Miami (4-7)
12. Oakland (4-7)
13. Tennessee (3-8)
14. Baltimore (3-8)
15. N.Y. Jets (2-9)
16. Houston (1-10)

NFC
1. Seattle (9-2) NFC West leaders
2. Chicago (8-3) NFC North leaders
3. Carolina (8-3) NFC South leaders
4. Dallas (7-4) NFC East leaders
5. N.Y. Giants (7-4) Wild card
6. Tampa Bay (7-4) Wild card

7. Atlanta (7-4)
8. Minnesota (6-5)
9. Washington (5-6)
10. Philadelphia (5-6)
11. St. Louis (5-6)
12. Detroit (4-7)
13. Arizona (3-8)
14. New Orleans (3-8)
15. Green Bay (2-9)
16. San Francisco (2-9)

Wild Card Matchups:
AFC: Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, Jacksonville at New England
NFC: Tampa Bay at Carolina, N.Y. Giants at Dallas

First-round byes:
AFC: Indianapolis, Denver
NFC: Seattle, Chicago
Promote this thread!
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 136

Posts: 1514/5587
EXP: 29556269
For next: 540723

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 23 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
#2 Posted on 1.12.05 2110.04
Reposted on: 1.12.12 2110.17
Playoff Scenarios! (excluding ties)

Seattle can clinch the NFC West Division with a win OR a St. Louis loss.

Indianapolis can do a number of things.

Playoff Spot: Win OR PIT loss coupled with either a SD loss or a KC loss.

Divison: Win AND JAX loss

First Round Bye: Win AND JAX loss AND CIN loss

Houston and San Francisco are eliminated.

NYJ is eliminated with a loss and a NE win.

TEN and BAL are eliminated with a loss and a win by PIT, SD, or KC.

GB is eliminated with a loss, or if three of DAL, NYG, TB, and ATL win. (I think their tiebreakers are slightly better than SF, which is why one is alive and one is not.)

SAINTS and ARZ are eliminated with a loss, and three of DAL, NYG, TB, and ATL winning.
Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 108

Posts: 3162/3273
EXP: 13194199
For next: 326344

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 508 days
Last activity: 309 days
#3 Posted on 2.12.05 0412.29
Reposted on: 2.12.12 0412.44
You took so long putting these up this week that I almost went ahead and did it again.



And then I remembered that I am lazy.



I'll say this right here and right now: If the AFC Championship features another Colts/Broncos playoff game, I'm calling the upset. Peyton got to exercise some demons this year, so turnabout is fair play and Denver gets to slip past the Colts.
Packman V2
Bratwurst
Level: 72

Posts: 523/1371
EXP: 3282959
For next: 40819

Since: 16.3.04
From: Albuquerque, NM

Since last post: 29 days
Last activity: 42 min.
AIM:  
Y!:
#4 Posted on 2.12.05 0750.45
Reposted on: 2.12.12 0751.16
Is anyone having a better year without any noise than the Jaguars?? I'm a big football fan, but didn't even realize that they were 8-3. That's impressive.
dunkndollaz
Banger
Back to Back Survivor
Level: 97

Posts: 1730/2588
EXP: 9295896
For next: 21462

Since: 3.1.02
From: Northern NJ

Since last post: 7 days
Last activity: 1 day
#5 Posted on 2.12.05 0912.13
Reposted on: 2.12.12 0912.21
    Originally posted by Jaguar
    I'll say this right here and right now: If the AFC Championship features another Colts/Broncos playoff game, I'm calling the upset. Peyton got to exercise some demons this year, so turnabout is fair play and Denver gets to slip past the Colts.


Preach to me Jaguar !!! This Broncos team is a lot different than the one that Peyton has killed in the past - we seem to actually have a pass defense (that was noticeably absent in the final Giants drive) and we have the running game that can eat the clock and limit the time the Colts O is on the field.

    Originally posted by Packman V2
    Is anyone having a better year without any noise than the Jaguars?? I'm a big football fan, but didn't even realize that they were 8-3. That's impressive.


The Jags while being quietly impressive are going to run into some trouble with Leftwich out with his ankle. Garrard is an unknown quality back up but they are going to have to become more of a running team than they have been this year and everyone knows how well Fred Taylor holds up to a heavy workload. Their game with Cleveland this weekend is going to be a lot tighter than it should be.
geemoney
Scrapple
Level: 114

Posts: 1755/3819
EXP: 16001749
For next: 307868

Since: 26.1.03
From: Naples, FL

Since last post: 3 hours
Last activity: 1 min.
AIM:  
#6 Posted on 2.12.05 0929.42
Reposted on: 2.12.12 0929.57
    Originally posted by Packman V2
    Is anyone having a better year without any noise than the Jaguars?? I'm a big football fan, but didn't even realize that they were 8-3. That's impressive.

They have a tendency to play down to their opponents level and have a really easy schedule. That's why they're not making noise.
EddieBurkett
Boudin blanc
Level: 94

Posts: 1305/2376
EXP: 8177707
For next: 178981

Since: 3.1.02
From: GA in person, NJ in heart

Since last post: 2 days
Last activity: 3 hours
#7 Posted on 2.12.05 1042.42
Reposted on: 2.12.12 1042.54
    Originally posted by dunkndollaz
    Garrard is an unknown quality back up


Hasn't Garrard filled in for Leftwich due to injuries before, like last season? Everything I've heard about him indicates that the Jags should do just fine with him, although I can see how the simulataneous loss of Leftwich and Taylor could be a problem. Then again, the Jags don't have that tough a schedule to close out with. Other than Indianapolis, I think Cleveland might the toughest team they play, followed by Tennesee. I could probably quarterback them to victory against San Francisco and Houston. So even with Garrard, I wouldn't be surprised for them to go 3-2 to finish 11-5, and that assumes a bad week. 12-4 is just as probable for them.

However, as pointed out, the Jags do tend to play down to their opposition. However, they've also had a rather mild schedule. They've beaten Seattle, Cincinnati (who I still consider paper tigers), and Pittsburgh (when Roethlisberger was out, right?), while losing to Denver, Indianapolis, and blowing that game against St. Louis. All this probably means they'll lose in the first round of the playoffs.
JustinShapiro
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 134

Posts: 1228/5398
EXP: 28062831
For next: 524217

Since: 12.12.01
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#8 Posted on 2.12.05 1503.11
Reposted on: 2.12.12 1503.24

    They've beaten Pittsburgh (when Roethlisberger was out, right?)


Yes. In a game that was literally single-handedly lost by his replacement. :(
Gugs
Bierwurst
Level: 84

Posts: 1454/1857
EXP: 5543503
For next: 118473

Since: 9.7.02
From: Sleep (That's where I'm a viking)

Since last post: 827 days
Last activity: 188 days
AIM:  
Y!:
#9 Posted on 2.12.05 1644.20
Reposted on: 2.12.12 1644.33
    Originally posted by thecubsfan
    NYJ is eliminated with a loss and a NE win.


Don't the Pats play the Jets Sunday, thus meaning that a NYJ loss guarantees a NE win?
thecubsfan
Scrapple
Moderator
Level: 136

Posts: 1517/5587
EXP: 29556269
For next: 540723

Since: 10.12.01
From: Aurora, IL

Since last post: 23 hours
Last activity: 1 hour
#10 Posted on 3.12.05 1347.00
Reposted on: 3.12.12 1347.42
Well, yes.
Phantom
Frankfurter
Level: 58

Posts: 693/777
EXP: 1517992
For next: 59563

Since: 17.3.02

Since last post: 2685 days
Last activity: 2661 days
#11 Posted on 6.12.05 1422.15
Reposted on: 6.12.12 1424.16
    Originally posted by Packman V2
    Is anyone having a better year without any noise than the Jaguars?? I'm a big football fan, but didn't even realize that they were 8-3. That's impressive.
Seattle's still having trouble getting credit for what they're doing. Yeah, they've had some lucky breaks, especially against Eli and the Giants. But they've got the leading rusher and best offensive line in the NFL, a rookie of the year candidate in Lofa Tatupu, and a defense which is second only to the Bears in the red zone. They're 10-2, leading the NFC, and went on a winning streak even when their two best receivers were on the disabled list.

And yet there are still pundits saying they won't prove themselves to be a good team until they win the NFC championship.

Jaguar
Knackwurst
Level: 108

Posts: 3166/3273
EXP: 13194199
For next: 326344

Since: 23.1.02
From: Phoenix, AZ

Since last post: 508 days
Last activity: 309 days
#12 Posted on 6.12.05 2050.25
Reposted on: 6.12.12 2050.46
It doesn't help when your team is only 3-2 against teams with a winning record. Nor when your schedual involves two games against the Cardinals, two games against the 49ers, a game against Tennesse and a game against Houston. With the exception of the Cardinals (ha!) those are the worst teams in the league. The only team to have as easy a schedual is the Colts, but it's hard to knock a team that's sitting at 12-0.


Added: Oh and a game against Green Bay! There are some high school football teams that could be in the playoff race with that schedual.

(edited by Jaguar on 6.12.05 2052)
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Bud Carson passes away at 75
Next thread: Westbrook done for season
Previous thread: 2005-2006 Bowl Season
(453 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 11 - NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 8 - NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 5 - More...
The 7 - Football - NFL Playoff Seedings After Week 12Register and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.186 seconds.