The W
Views: 120097272
Main | FAQ | Search: Y! / G | Color chart | Log in for more!
23.1.10 0455
The 7 - Hockey - Say it Aint' So, Joe Register and log in to post!
(162 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
User
Post (15 total)
odessasteps
Scrapple
Level: 132

Posts: 2190/5065
EXP: 26731992
For next: 400012

Since: 2.1.02
From: MD, USA

Since last post: 950 days
Last activity: 917 days
#1 Posted on 30.11.05 2211.05
Reposted on: 30.11.12 2211.38
BOSTON --The struggling Boston Bruins traded captain Joe Thornton to the San Jose Sharks on Wednesday night in exchange for three players.

The Bruins get forwards Marco Sturm and Wayne Primeau and defenseman Brad Stuart for Thornton, who signed a three-year, $20 million contract with Boston in August and was once thought to be the future of the franchise.

The 6-foot-4, 225-pound Thornton had been the key to the Bruins' offense. He scored more than 20 goals in each of his last five NHL seasons, including two with 30 or more. In 2003-04, he led the team in scoring with 23 goals and 50 assists.

This season, the 26-year-old Thornton has nine goals and 24 assists for Boston, which has lost nine of its last 10 games and is in last place in the Northeast Division.
Promote this thread!
orangeman
Salami
Level: 33

Posts: 171/224
EXP: 225847
For next: 3335

Since: 21.8.04
From: ...that would be telling

Since last post: 3870 days
Last activity: 3816 days
#2 Posted on 30.11.05 2227.03
Reposted on: 30.11.12 2227.43
Hmmm, perhaps this stalls the Mike Sullivan death watch for a bit. Now there will be Bruins talk on WEEI for at least an hour or two tomorrow before the callers go back to Manny Ramirez and the Patriots injury problems.

I wonder what the combined salaries of the 3 new guys are because one of Boston's problems was/is the salary cap, despite managment's pre-season proclamtions that things had worked just like they wanted and they were in great position money-wise.
Chumpstain
Bockwurst
Level: 51

Posts: 116/568
EXP: 1002196
For next: 11749

Since: 21.1.02
From: Canada

Since last post: 23 days
Last activity: 5 hours
#3 Posted on 1.12.05 0214.53
Reposted on: 1.12.12 0215.10
    Originally posted by orangeman
    I wonder what the combined salaries of the 3 new guys are because one of Boston's problems was/is the salary cap, despite managment's pre-season proclamtions that things had worked just like they wanted and they were in great position money-wise.


The Bruins will save 1.66 million dollars against the cap with this trade.
Mr. Heat Miser
Blutwurst
Level: 37

Posts: 251/259
EXP: 308403
For next: 29853

Since: 27.1.02

Since last post: 3367 days
Last activity: 1470 days
#4 Posted on 1.12.05 0740.06
Reposted on: 1.12.12 0740.06
So I see why San Jose would make the deal, but what do the B's get out of it? They save a bit of cap room, but there were other ways to do that...

Is Boston throwing in the towel on the season already?
odessasteps
Scrapple
Level: 132

Posts: 2192/5065
EXP: 26731992
For next: 400012

Since: 2.1.02
From: MD, USA

Since last post: 950 days
Last activity: 917 days
#5 Posted on 1.12.05 0800.17
Reposted on: 1.12.12 0800.34

Wasn't Thorton going to be a free agent? And Likely not to re-sign with the B's?

orangeman
Salami
Level: 33

Posts: 172/224
EXP: 225847
For next: 3335

Since: 21.8.04
From: ...that would be telling

Since last post: 3870 days
Last activity: 3816 days
#6 Posted on 1.12.05 0818.45
Reposted on: 1.12.12 0819.24
    Originally posted by odessasteps
    Thornton, who signed a three-year, $20 million contract with Boston in August


^^^ from your first post in the thread ^^^
pieman
As young as
he feels
Level: 116

Posts: 2101/3713
EXP: 16811993
For next: 512152

Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 17 days
Last activity: 3 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#7 Posted on 1.12.05 0904.11
Reposted on: 1.12.12 0904.19
    Originally posted by Mr. Heat Miser
    Is Boston throwing in the towel on the season already?


This appears to be throwing the towel in for several years and for what purpose? How can saving a little cap room be worth giving away your best player??? And believe me, they gave him away because these three scrubeenies they got back is a crap sandwich. I must go read the Boston Globe now so my head will really explode.
JayJayDean
Scrapple
Level: 128

Posts: 2435/4750
EXP: 24278178
For next: 103588

Since: 2.1.02
From: Seattle, WA

Since last post: 363 days
Last activity: 6 hours
AIM:  
Y!:
#8 Posted on 1.12.05 0907.45
Reposted on: 1.12.12 0907.51
This reminds me of why I'm glad I turned from a Bruins fan to an Avs fan. (Thank you Ray Bourque-trade!) How does giving a guy a three-year, near-max deal then trading him after only 20 GAMES make ANY sense?
El Nastio
Boudin blanc
Level: 96

Posts: 930/2437
EXP: 8912222
For next: 76597

Since: 14.1.02
From: Ottawa Ontario, by way of Walkerton

Since last post: 4 days
Last activity: 6 hours
ICQ:  
#9 Posted on 1.12.05 1125.32
Reposted on: 1.12.12 1125.53
THE BRUINS: They needed a shakeup of some sort after a lousy start to the season. Personally, I think you can lay the fault on the defense and poor goaltending and not Thorton. And I don't think ANYBODY counted on the Northeast being the northBEAST with all of the killer teams in there *who wants to play Ottawa, Habs, Leafs, and Sabres eight times this season?). I'll tell ya though, NO ONE on that roster is safe, and they know that now. Sturm, Primeau, and Stuart aren't anyone to sneeze at. They don't have the skill of Thorton alone, that much is true....but they are still good players. I think this trade makes Bostona better TEAM, and gives them some more pieces to build with. That's not pieces to build AROUND, but WITH. None of those guys can you say "hey, he's a cornerstone!". But they are guys who can contribute on a regular basis. The 1.66 million being saved? Well, they can make a run for someone now.


THE SHARKS: BRILLIANT trade by Doug Wilson. They needed a shakeup as well. Some scoring and size were the two big needs. He certianly aquired that. The Sharks have TONNES of deph on their team, they were merely lacking that goto guy, the impact player who can change the face of the game. The Sharks now have two of the best young centres in the game with Thorton and Patrick Marlou (sp?). They'll be set in that position for YEARS.


ADAVTANGE: Sharks, no question.



(edited by El Nastio on 1.12.05 1227)
haz
Landjager
Level: 63

Posts: 626/904
EXP: 2015701
For next: 81462

Since: 2.1.02
From: Whitby, Ontario, Canada

Since last post: 894 days
Last activity: 504 days
#10 Posted on 1.12.05 1232.49
Reposted on: 1.12.12 1232.58
    Originally posted by Chumpstain
      Originally posted by orangeman
      I wonder what the combined salaries of the 3 new guys are because one of Boston's problems was/is the salary cap, despite managment's pre-season proclamtions that things had worked just like they wanted and they were in great position money-wise.


    The Bruins will save 1.66 million dollars against the cap with this trade.


True enough that is a small savings, but for the next two years the savings balloons to 13 million.

This will free up room for them to go after something bigger next summer....

Still don't like the deal, but one must wait and see, I guess.
pieman
As young as
he feels
Level: 116

Posts: 2103/3713
EXP: 16811993
For next: 512152

Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 17 days
Last activity: 3 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#11 Posted on 1.12.05 1340.19
Reposted on: 1.12.12 1340.32
I have since read the Globe and the feeling is "well, something needed to happen." Thornton seemed surprised and a little disappointed and that he was being blamed for the lousy start. Some of the writers are saying maybe if Bergeron, Raycroft and some of the others had stepped up a little, then Joe wouldn't have been traded. The article also stated that in coming seasons, Thornton's contract would have assumed about 20% of their payroll. There was also some belief that Samsonov would be the one traded since he's an unrestricted free agent after the season. Maybe he's next?
britishiles
Head cheese
Level: 39

Posts: 83/332
EXP: 392170
For next: 12605

Since: 22.7.05
From: Tulsa, OK

Since last post: 849 days
Last activity: 819 days
#12 Posted on 1.12.05 1546.36
Reposted on: 1.12.12 1546.58
Hey...if the B's can trade Bourque they can trade anyone.

I guess we should also keep in mind that Gretzky was traded twice (or was it three times).
orangeman
Salami
Level: 33

Posts: 173/224
EXP: 225847
For next: 3335

Since: 21.8.04
From: ...that would be telling

Since last post: 3870 days
Last activity: 3816 days
#13 Posted on 1.12.05 2356.31
Reposted on: 1.12.12 2357.40
Something else about Thornton's contract that I didn't know until tonight, he had a no-trade clause for years 2 and 3. From listening to Harry Sinden and Mike O'Connell today and knowing that about the contract, I get the impression the team thought Thornton had done all he could do here and they didn't see him improving past the level he'd reached, so they moved him and will look to spend the money elsewhere rather than have it locked up. I don't necessarily have a problem with that line of thinking, but I think concern over the money caused them to come up way short in shopping the deal to get as close to equal value as they could talent-wise.
Freeway
Scrapple
Level: 113

Posts: 3120/3504
EXP: 15380161
For next: 438448

Since: 3.1.02
From: Calgary

Since last post: 1128 days
Last activity: 815 days
#14 Posted on 2.12.05 0023.25
Reposted on: 2.12.12 0023.35

    I get the impression the team thought Thornton had done all he could do here and they didn't see him improving past the level he'd reached, so they moved him and will look to spend the money elsewhere rather than have it locked up. I don't necessarily have a problem with that line of thinking, but I think concern over the money caused them to come up way short in shopping the deal to get as close to equal value as they could talent-wise.


The Flames (circa 1991) had a huge bloated payroll and had to dismantle, so they did so in a series of trades just as lopsided as the Thornton deal (if not moreso). Those deals, especially the absolutely one-sided Doug Gilmour trade, were just as rushed as the Thornton deal and sunk a profitable and successful team.

Let's hope the Bruins don't fall into the same trap.
pieman
As young as
he feels
Level: 116

Posts: 2105/3713
EXP: 16811993
For next: 512152

Since: 11.12.01
From: China, Maine

Since last post: 17 days
Last activity: 3 days
AIM:  
ICQ:  
Y!:
#15 Posted on 2.12.05 0938.47
Reposted on: 2.12.12 0938.49
A nice 3-0 win against the league's top team last night and Sturm scores on his first shift. That's a good way to be welcomed by your teammates. We'll see how long the honeymoon lasts, though.
ALL ORIGINAL POSTS IN THIS THREAD ARE NOW AVAILABLE
Thread ahead: Mario Hospitalized With Irregular Heartbeat
Next thread: How are there still ties in Hockey?
Previous thread: My trip to RBC
(162 newer) Next thread | Previous thread
Related threads: Bruins sign Thornton! - Modano to the Bruins? - Gonchar dealt to Bruins - More...
The 7 - Hockey - Say it Aint' So, JoeRegister and log in to post!

The W™ message board - 7 year recycle

ZimBoard
©2001-2015 Brothers Zim
This old hunk of junk rendered your page in 0.252 seconds.