Since last post: 3264 days Last activity: 3198 days
#22 Posted on 24.11.05 1250.44 Reposted on: 24.11.12 1251.43
I was thinking that they've just shifted the title change back a week so as not to conflict with the Raw Vs. SmackDown feud. If Orton had one the belt this week it would've no doubt been via heel chicanery, which would've overshadowed the angle they're pushing for this Sunday. By pushing the switch back a week they make sure that the focus is where it should be both for Survivor Series and for the title change itself.
#23 Posted on 24.11.05 1550.38 Reposted on: 24.11.12 1551.51
I figured Orton would win because of Team Raw interfering in the match, causing Batista to lose his title to a teammate only a couple days before Survivor Series as part of a plan to try to get the Smackdown team to self-destruct (also protecting the team/brand in case they lose the match).
Since last post: 3085 days Last activity: 431 days
#24 Posted on 25.11.05 1604.20 Reposted on: 25.11.12 1607.23
Hey, WWE is back in 'little old England', so we can see traditional London taxi cabs and vintage red telephone boxes (very very rare now) around 200 odd miles away in Sheffield !
Someone give WWE a map for Christmas.
We always find it quite funny when they talk about England in such a fashion, though I think if we Brits said Americans walk around in cowboy hats, chewed gum and talk loud and obnoxiously, there would be an outcry, even though they do.